How to Auto-optimize Prompts for Domain Tasks? Adaptive Prompting and Reasoning through Evolutionary Domain Knowledge Adaptation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.21148v1
• Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 04:38:53 GMT
• Title: How to Auto-optimize Prompts for Domain Tasks? Adaptive Prompting and Reasoning through Evolutionary Domain Knowledge Adaptation
• Authors: Yang Zhao, Pu Wang, Hao Frank Yang,
• Abstract summary: EGO-Prompt is an automated framework to design better prompts, efficient reasoning processes and enhanced causal-informed process.<n>It integrates a novel causal-guided textual gradient process in two steps.<n>It achieves 7.32%-12.61% higher F1 than cutting-edge methods, and allows small models to reach the performence of larger models at under 20% of the original cost.
• Score: 14.124422051296813
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Designing optimal prompts and reasoning processes for large language models (LLMs) on domain-specific tasks is both necessary and challenging in real-world applications. Determining how to integrate domain knowledge, enhance reasoning efficiency, and even provide domain experts with refined knowledge integration hints are particularly crucial yet unresolved tasks. In this research, we propose Evolutionary Graph Optimization for Prompting (EGO-Prompt), an automated framework to designing better prompts, efficient reasoning processes and providing enhanced causal-informed process. EGO-Prompt begins with a general prompt and fault-tolerant initial Semantic Causal Graph (SCG) descriptions, constructed by human experts, which is then automatically refined and optimized to guide LLM reasoning. Recognizing that expert-defined SCGs may be partial or imperfect and that their optimal integration varies across LLMs, EGO-Prompt integrates a novel causal-guided textual gradient process in two steps: first, generating nearly deterministic reasoning guidance from the SCG for each instance, and second, adapting the LLM to effectively utilize the guidance alongside the original input. The iterative optimization algorithm further refines both the SCG and the reasoning mechanism using textual gradients with ground-truth. We tested the framework on real-world public health, transportation and human behavior tasks. EGO-Prompt achieves 7.32%-12.61% higher F1 than cutting-edge methods, and allows small models to reach the performence of larger models at under 20% of the original cost. It also outputs a refined, domain-specific SCG that improves interpretability.

Related papers

• Beyond the Prompt: Assessing Domain Knowledge Strategies for High-Dimensional LLM Optimization in Software Engineering [4.168157981135697]
  We compare human versus artificial intelligence strategies for generating domain knowledge.<n>We systematically evaluate four distinct architectures to determine if structured knowledge integration enables LLMs to generate effective warm starts for high-dimensional optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T20:07:15Z)
• TL-GRPO: Turn-Level RL for Reasoning-Guided Iterative Optimization [97.18886232580131]
  Large language models have demonstrated strong reasoning capabilities in complex tasks through tool integration.<n>We propose Turn-Level GRPO, a lightweight RL algorithm that performs turn-level group sampling for fine-grained optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-23T06:21:33Z)
• Learning from Prompt itself: the Hierarchical Attribution Prompt Optimization [13.8868879878572]
  A structured optimization approach requires automated or semi-automated procedures to develop improved prompts.<n>Current prompt optimization methods often induce prompt drift, where new prompts fix prior failures but impair performance on previously successful tasks.<n>This study proposes the Hierarchical Prompt Optimization framework, which introduces three innovations: (1) a dynamic attribution mechanism targeting error patterns in training data and prompting history, (2) semantic-unit optimization for editing functional prompt segments, and (3) multimodal-friendly progression supporting both end-to-end LLM and LLM-MLLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-06T03:34:17Z)
• Auto-Prompting with Retrieval Guidance for Frame Detection in Logistics [0.0]
  Prompt engineering plays a critical role in adapting large language models (LLMs) to complex reasoning and labeling tasks without the need for extensive fine-tuning.<n>We propose a novel prompt optimization pipeline for frame detection in logistics texts, combining retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), few-shot prompting, chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning, and automatic CoT synthesis (Auto-CoT) to generate highly effective task-specific prompts.<n>Our framework is evaluated on a real-world logistics text annotation task, where reasoning accuracy and labeling efficiency are critical.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-22T10:29:51Z)
• Grammar-Guided Evolutionary Search for Discrete Prompt Optimisation [63.97051732013936]
  We propose an evolutionary search approach to automated discrete prompt optimisation consisting of two phases.<n>In the first phase, grammar-guided genetic programming is invoked to synthesise prompt-creating programmes.<n>In the second phase, local search is applied to explore the neighbourhoods of best-performing programmes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-14T14:34:15Z)
• Tournament of Prompts: Evolving LLM Instructions Through Structured Debates and Elo Ratings [0.9437165725355702]
  We introduce DEEVO, a novel framework that guides prompt evolution through a debate-driven evaluation with an Elo-based selection.<n>Using Elo ratings as a fitness proxy, DEEVO simultaneously drives improvement and preserves valuable diversity in the prompt population.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T19:33:41Z)
• A Survey of Frontiers in LLM Reasoning: Inference Scaling, Learning to Reason, and Agentic Systems [93.8285345915925]
  Reasoning is a fundamental cognitive process that enables logical inference, problem-solving, and decision-making.<n>With the rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs), reasoning has emerged as a key capability that distinguishes advanced AI systems.<n>We categorize existing methods along two dimensions: (1) Regimes, which define the stage at which reasoning is achieved; and (2) Architectures, which determine the components involved in the reasoning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-12T01:27:49Z)
• From Understanding to Excelling: Template-Free Algorithm Design through Structural-Functional Co-Evolution [39.42526347710991]
  Large language models (LLMs) have greatly accelerated the automation of algorithm generation and optimization.<n>We introduce an end-to-end algorithm generation and optimization framework based on LLMs.<n>Our approach utilizes the deep semantic understanding of LLMs to convert natural language requirements or human-authored papers into code solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-13T08:26:18Z)
• A Survey on Post-training of Large Language Models [185.51013463503946]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have fundamentally transformed natural language processing, making them indispensable across domains ranging from conversational systems to scientific exploration.<n>These challenges necessitate advanced post-training language models (PoLMs) to address shortcomings, such as restricted reasoning capacities, ethical uncertainties, and suboptimal domain-specific performance.<n>This paper presents the first comprehensive survey of PoLMs, systematically tracing their evolution across five core paradigms: Fine-tuning, which enhances task-specific accuracy; Alignment, which ensures ethical coherence and alignment with human preferences; Reasoning, which advances multi-step inference despite challenges in reward design; Integration and Adaptation, which
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-08T05:41:42Z)
• Towards more Contextual Agents: An extractor-Generator Optimization Framework [0.0]
  Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents have demonstrated remarkable success in solving complex tasks across a wide range of general-purpose applications.<n>However, their performance often degrades in context-specific scenarios, such as specialized industries or research domains.<n>To address this challenge, our work introduces a systematic approach to enhance the contextual adaptability of LLM-based agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T15:07:06Z)
• OG-RAG: Ontology-Grounded Retrieval-Augmented Generation For Large Language Models [5.967549123296788]
  This paper presents OG-RAG, an Ontology-Grounded Retrieval Generation method to enhance-generated responses by anchoring processes in domain-specific context.<n> OG-RAG applies to domains where fact-based reasoning is essential, particularly in tasks that require or decision-making steps to follow rules and procedures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-12T01:21:03Z)
• LLM as a Complementary Optimizer to Gradient Descent: A Case Study in Prompt Tuning [69.95292905263393]
  We show that gradient-based and high-level LLMs can effectively collaborate a combined optimization framework.<n>In this paper, we show that these complementary to each other and can effectively collaborate a combined optimization framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T06:24:14Z)
• Localized Zeroth-Order Prompt Optimization [54.964765668688806]
  We propose a novel algorithm, namely localized zeroth-order prompt optimization (ZOPO) ZOPO incorporates a Neural Tangent Kernel-based derived Gaussian process into standard zeroth-order optimization for an efficient search of well-performing local optima in prompt optimization. Remarkably, ZOPO outperforms existing baselines in terms of both the optimization performance and the query efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T14:18:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.