Language Ranker: A Lightweight Ranking framework for LLM Decoding

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.21883v1
• Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 17:56:46 GMT
• Title: Language Ranker: A Lightweight Ranking framework for LLM Decoding
• Authors: Chenheng Zhang, Tianqi Du, Jizhe Zhang, Mingqing Xiao, Yifei Wang, Yisen Wang, Zhouchen Lin,
• Abstract summary: This paper conceptualizes the decoding process as analogous to the ranking stage in recommendation pipelines.<n>Motivated by this insight, we propose Language Ranker, a novel framework that introduces a lightweight module to rerank candidate responses.<n> Experiments show that Language Ranker achieves performance comparable to large-scale reward models, while requiring only 0.5M additional parameters.
• Score: 70.01564145836129
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Conventional research on large language models (LLMs) has primarily focused on refining output distributions, while paying less attention to the decoding process that transforms these distributions into final responses. Recent advances, such as scaling the computation of inference time with reward models, have underscored the importance of decoding, but these methods often suffer from high computational costs and limited applicability. In this paper, we revisit LLM generation through the lens of recommender systems, conceptualizing the decoding process as analogous to the ranking stage in recommendation pipelines. From this perspective, we observe that both traditional decoding methods and reward models exhibit clear limitations such as redundancy. Motivated by this insight, we propose Language Ranker, a novel framework that introduces a lightweight module to rerank candidate responses using features extracted by the base model. Experiments across a wide range of tasks show that Language Ranker achieves performance comparable to large-scale reward models, while requiring only <0.5M additional parameters, significantly reducing the computational overhead during both training and inference stages. This highlights the efficiency and effectiveness of our method, showcasing its potential to fully unlock the capabilities of LLMs.

Related papers

• Principled RL for Diffusion LLMs Emerges from a Sequence-Level Perspective [85.06838178922791]
  Reinforcement Learning (RL) has proven highly effective for autoregressive language models.<n>But adapting these methods to diffusion large language models (dLLMs) presents fundamental challenges.<n>We propose a principled RL framework that treats entire sequence generation as a single action and uses the ELBO as a tractable sequence-level likelihood proxy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-03T13:05:32Z)
• ImCoref-CeS: An Improved Lightweight Pipeline for Coreference Resolution with LLM-based Checker-Splitter Refinement [45.01372641622595]
  We present ImCoref-CeS, a novel framework that integrates an enhanced supervised model with Large Language Models (LLMs)-based reasoning.<n>First, we present an improved CR method (textbfImCoref) to push the performance boundaries of the supervised neural method.<n>We employ an LLM acting as a multi-role Checker-Splitter agent to validate candidate mentions and coreference results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-11T14:48:08Z)
• Quantization Meets dLLMs: A Systematic Study of Post-training Quantization for Diffusion LLMs [78.09559830840595]
  We present the first systematic study on quantizing diffusion-based language models.<n>We identify the presence of activation outliers, characterized by abnormally large activation values.<n>We implement state-of-the-art PTQ methods and conduct a comprehensive evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-20T17:59:51Z)
• Leveraging Importance Sampling to Detach Alignment Modules from Large Language Models [48.15777554876988]
  Traditional alignment methods often require retraining large pretrained models.<n>We propose a novel textitResidual Alignment Model (textitRAM) that formalizes the alignment process as a type of importance sampling.<n>We develop a resampling algorithm with iterative token-level decoding to address the common first-token latency issue in comparable methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T08:53:02Z)
• Reward-Guided Speculative Decoding for Efficient LLM Reasoning [80.55186052123196]
  We introduce Reward-Guided Speculative Decoding (RSD), a novel framework aimed at improving the efficiency of inference in large language models (LLMs)<n>RSD incorporates a controlled bias to prioritize high-reward outputs, in contrast to existing speculative decoding methods that enforce strict unbiasedness.<n>RSD delivers significant efficiency gains against decoding with the target model only, while achieving significant better accuracy than parallel decoding method on average.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-31T17:19:57Z)
• Closer Look at Efficient Inference Methods: A Survey of Speculative Decoding [1.3479499607624648]
  Speculative decoding addresses bottleneck by introducing a two-stage framework: drafting and verification.<n>A smaller, efficient model generates a preliminary draft, which is then refined by a larger, more sophisticated model.<n>This paper provides a comprehensive survey of speculative decoding methods, categorizing them into draft-centric and model-centric approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-20T09:46:30Z)
• Attribute Controlled Fine-tuning for Large Language Models: A Case Study on Detoxification [76.14641982122696]
  We propose a constraint learning schema for fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs) with attribute control. We show that our approach leads to an LLM that produces fewer inappropriate responses while achieving competitive performance on benchmarks and a toxicity detection task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T23:38:58Z)
• CoMMIT: Coordinated Multimodal Instruction Tuning [90.1532838391285]
  Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) generally involve cooperative learning between a backbone LLM and a feature encoder of non-text input modalities.<n>In this paper, we analyze the MLLM instruction tuning from both theoretical and empirical perspectives.<n>We propose a Multimodal Balance Coefficient that enables quantitative measurement of the balance of learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-29T23:18:55Z)
• Tender: Accelerating Large Language Models via Tensor Decomposition and Runtime Requantization [0.6445087473595953]
  Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate outstanding performance in various tasks in machine learning. deploying LLM inference poses challenges due to the high compute and memory requirements. We present Tender, an algorithm-hardware co-design solution that enables efficient deployment of LLM inference at low precision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-16T09:51:55Z)
• SLMRec: Distilling Large Language Models into Small for Sequential Recommendation [38.51895517016953]
  Sequential Recommendation task involves predicting the next item a user is likely to interact with, given their past interactions.<n>Recent research demonstrates the great impact of LLMs on sequential recommendation systems.<n>Due to the huge size of LLMs, it is inefficient and impractical to apply a LLM-based model in real-world platforms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T07:12:06Z)
• Chimera: A Lossless Decoding Method for Accelerating Large Language Models Inference by Fusing all Tokens [15.566726645722657]
  We propose a novel framework specifically designed for speculative sampling. Within this framework, we introduce a lightweight draft model that effectively utilizes previously generated tokens to predict subsequent words. We demonstrate impressive results, achieving an average latency speedup ratio of 2.7x compared to the vanilla auto-regressive decoding approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-24T08:10:39Z)
• Amortizing intractable inference in large language models [56.92471123778389]
  We use amortized Bayesian inference to sample from intractable posterior distributions. We empirically demonstrate that this distribution-matching paradigm of LLM fine-tuning can serve as an effective alternative to maximum-likelihood training. As an important application, we interpret chain-of-thought reasoning as a latent variable modeling problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-06T16:36:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.