Uncovering the Persuasive Fingerprint of LLMs in Jailbreaking Attacks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.21983v1
• Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 19:20:23 GMT
• Title: Uncovering the Persuasive Fingerprint of LLMs in Jailbreaking Attacks
• Authors: Havva Alizadeh Noughabi, Julien Serbanescu, Fattane Zarrinkalam, Ali Dehghantanha,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models are vulnerable to jailbreak attacks that bypass alignment safeguards and elicit harmful outputs.<n>We show that persuasion-aware prompts significantly bypass safeguards, demonstrating their potential to induce jailbreak behaviors.
• Score: 3.210547774251958
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Despite recent advances, Large Language Models remain vulnerable to jailbreak attacks that bypass alignment safeguards and elicit harmful outputs. While prior research has proposed various attack strategies differing in human readability and transferability, little attention has been paid to the linguistic and psychological mechanisms that may influence a model's susceptibility to such attacks. In this paper, we examine an interdisciplinary line of research that leverages foundational theories of persuasion from the social sciences to craft adversarial prompts capable of circumventing alignment constraints in LLMs. Drawing on well-established persuasive strategies, we hypothesize that LLMs, having been trained on large-scale human-generated text, may respond more compliantly to prompts with persuasive structures. Furthermore, we investigate whether LLMs themselves exhibit distinct persuasive fingerprints that emerge in their jailbreak responses. Empirical evaluations across multiple aligned LLMs reveal that persuasion-aware prompts significantly bypass safeguards, demonstrating their potential to induce jailbreak behaviors. This work underscores the importance of cross-disciplinary insight in addressing the evolving challenges of LLM safety. The code and data are available.

Related papers

• Confusion is the Final Barrier: Rethinking Jailbreak Evaluation and Investigating the Real Misuse Threat of LLMs [16.95831588112687]
  This study investigates the misuse threats of Large Language Models (LLMs) in terms of dangerous knowledge possession, harmful task planning utility, and harmfulness judgment.<n> Experiments reveal a mismatch between jailbreak success rates and harmful knowledge possession in LLMs, and existing LLM-as-a-judge frameworks tend to anchor harmfulness judgments on toxic language patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-22T12:41:26Z)
• Why Not Act on What You Know? Unleashing Safety Potential of LLMs via Self-Aware Guard Enhancement [48.50995874445193]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive capabilities across various tasks but remain vulnerable to meticulously crafted jailbreak attacks.<n>We propose SAGE (Self-Aware Guard Enhancement), a training-free defense strategy designed to align LLMs' strong safety discrimination performance with their relatively weaker safety generation ability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-17T15:54:52Z)
• Token Highlighter: Inspecting and Mitigating Jailbreak Prompts for Large Language Models [61.916827858666906]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being integrated into services such as ChatGPT to provide responses to user queries.<n>This paper proposes a method called Token Highlighter to inspect and mitigate the potential jailbreak threats in the user query.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-24T05:10:02Z)
• Jailbreak Attacks and Defenses Against Large Language Models: A Survey [22.392989536664288]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have performed exceptionally in various text-generative tasks. "jailbreaking" induces the model to generate malicious responses against the usage policy and society. We propose a comprehensive and detailed taxonomy of jailbreak attack and defense methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-05T06:57:30Z)
• Jailbreaking Large Language Models Through Alignment Vulnerabilities in Out-of-Distribution Settings [57.136748215262884]
  We introduce ObscurePrompt for jailbreaking LLMs, inspired by the observed fragile alignments in Out-of-Distribution (OOD) data.<n>We first formulate the decision boundary in the jailbreaking process and then explore how obscure text affects LLM's ethical decision boundary.<n>Our approach substantially improves upon previous methods in terms of attack effectiveness, maintaining efficacy against two prevalent defense mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T16:09:58Z)
• Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreak Attacks via Layer-specific Editing [14.094372002702476]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being adopted in a wide range of real-world applications. Recent studies have shown that LLMs are vulnerable to deliberately crafted adversarial prompts. We propose a novel defense method termed textbfLayer-specific textbfEditing (LED) to enhance the resilience of LLMs against jailbreak attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T13:26:12Z)
• Subtoxic Questions: Dive Into Attitude Change of LLM's Response in Jailbreak Attempts [13.176057229119408]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) of Prompt Jailbreaking are getting more and more attention. We propose a novel approach by focusing on a set of target questions that are inherently more sensitive to jailbreak prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-12T08:08:44Z)
• JailbreakRadar: Comprehensive Assessment of Jailbreak Attacks Against LLMs [26.981225219312627]
  We present a large-scale evaluation of various jailbreak attacks.<n>We collect 17 representative jailbreak attacks, summarize their features, and establish a novel jailbreak attack taxonomy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-08T13:42:50Z)
• How Johnny Can Persuade LLMs to Jailbreak Them: Rethinking Persuasion to Challenge AI Safety by Humanizing LLMs [66.05593434288625]
  This paper introduces a new perspective to jailbreak large language models (LLMs) as human-like communicators. We apply a persuasion taxonomy derived from decades of social science research to generate persuasive adversarial prompts (PAP) to jailbreak LLMs. PAP consistently achieves an attack success rate of over $92%$ on Llama 2-7b Chat, GPT-3.5, and GPT-4 in $10$ trials. On the defense side, we explore various mechanisms against PAP and, found a significant gap in existing defenses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T16:13:24Z)
• Revisiting Jailbreaking for Large Language Models: A Representation Engineering Perspective [43.94115802328438]
  Recent surge in jailbreaking attacks has revealed significant vulnerabilities in Large Language Models (LLMs) when exposed to malicious inputs.<n>We suggest that the self-safeguarding capability of LLMs is linked to specific activity patterns within their representation space.<n>Our findings demonstrate that these patterns can be detected with just a few pairs of contrastive queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T00:50:04Z)
• Cognitive Overload: Jailbreaking Large Language Models with Overloaded Logical Thinking [60.78524314357671]
  We investigate a novel category of jailbreak attacks specifically designed to target the cognitive structure and processes of large language models (LLMs) Our proposed cognitive overload is a black-box attack with no need for knowledge of model architecture or access to model weights. Experiments conducted on AdvBench and MasterKey reveal that various LLMs, including both popular open-source model Llama 2 and the proprietary model ChatGPT, can be compromised through cognitive overload.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T11:52:22Z)
• Jailbreak and Guard Aligned Language Models with Only Few In-Context Demonstrations [38.437893814759086]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable success in various tasks, yet their safety and the risk of generating harmful content remain pressing concerns. We propose the In-Context Attack (ICA) which employs harmful demonstrations to subvert LLMs, and the In-Context Defense (ICD) which bolsters model resilience through examples that demonstrate refusal to produce harmful responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-10T07:50:29Z)
• Red Teaming Language Model Detectors with Language Models [114.36392560711022]
  Large language models (LLMs) present significant safety and ethical risks if exploited by malicious users. Recent works have proposed algorithms to detect LLM-generated text and protect LLMs. We study two types of attack strategies: 1) replacing certain words in an LLM's output with their synonyms given the context; 2) automatically searching for an instructional prompt to alter the writing style of the generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T10:08:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.