Impact and Implications of Generative AI for Enterprise Architects in Agile Environments: A Systematic Literature Review
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.22003v1
- Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 20:09:54 GMT
- Title: Impact and Implications of Generative AI for Enterprise Architects in Agile Environments: A Systematic Literature Review
- Authors: Stefan Julian Kooy, Jean Paul Sebastian Piest, Rob Henk Bemthuis,
- Abstract summary: Generative AI (GenAI) is reshaping enterprise architecture work in agile software organizations, yet evidence on its effects remains scattered.<n>We report a systematic literature review, following established SLR protocols of Kitchenham and PRISMA, of 1,697 records.<n>GenAI most consistently supports (i) design ideation and trade-off exploration; (ii) rapid creation and refinement of artifacts; and (iii) architectural decision support and knowledge retrieval.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Generative AI (GenAI) is reshaping enterprise architecture work in agile software organizations, yet evidence on its effects remains scattered. We report a systematic literature review (SLR), following established SLR protocols of Kitchenham and PRISMA, of 1,697 records, yielding 33 studies across enterprise, solution, domain, business, and IT architect roles. GenAI most consistently supports (i) design ideation and trade-off exploration; (ii) rapid creation and refinement of artifacts (e.g., code, models, documentation); and (iii) architectural decision support and knowledge retrieval. Reported risks include opacity and bias, contextually incorrect outputs leading to rework, privacy and compliance concerns, and social loafing. We also identify emerging skills and competencies, including prompt engineering, model evaluation, and professional oversight, and organizational enablers around readiness and adaptive governance. The review contributes with (1) a mapping of GenAI use cases and risks in agile architecting, (2) implications for capability building and governance, and (3) an initial research agenda on human-AI collaboration in architecture. Overall, the findings inform responsible adoption of GenAI that accelerates digital transformation while safeguarding architectural integrity.
Related papers
- AssurAI: Experience with Constructing Korean Socio-cultural Datasets to Discover Potential Risks of Generative AI [50.802995291689086]
We introduce AssurAI, a new quality-controlled Korean multimodal dataset for evaluating the safety of generative AI.<n>We define a taxonomy of 35 distinct AI risk factors, adapted from established frameworks to cover both universal harms and relevance to the Korean socio-cultural context.<n>AssurAI is a large-scale Korean multimodal dataset comprising 11,480 instances across text, image, video, and audio.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-20T13:59:42Z) - Never Compromise to Vulnerabilities: A Comprehensive Survey on AI Governance [211.5823259429128]
We propose a comprehensive framework integrating technical and societal dimensions, structured around three interconnected pillars: Intrinsic Security, Derivative Security, and Social Ethics.<n>We identify three core challenges: (1) the generalization gap, where defenses fail against evolving threats; (2) inadequate evaluation protocols that overlook real-world risks; and (3) fragmented regulations leading to inconsistent oversight.<n>Our framework offers actionable guidance for researchers, engineers, and policymakers to develop AI systems that are not only robust and secure but also ethically aligned and publicly trustworthy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-12T09:42:56Z) - The Architecture of Trust: A Framework for AI-Augmented Real Estate Valuation in the Era of Structured Data [0.0]
The Uniform Appraisal dataset (UAD) 3.6's mandatory 2026 implementation transforms residential property valuation from narrative reporting to machine-readable formats.<n>This paper provides the first comprehensive analysis of this regulatory shift alongside concurrent AI advances in computer vision, natural language processing, and autonomous systems.<n>We develop a three-layer framework for AI-augmented valuation addressing technical implementation and institutional trust requirements.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-04T05:24:25Z) - AI-powered Contextual 3D Environment Generation: A Systematic Review [49.1574468325115]
This study performs a systematic review of existing generative AI techniques for 3D scene generation.<n>By examining state-of-the-art approaches, it presents key challenges such as scene authenticity and the influence of textual inputs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-05T15:56:28Z) - Creativity in LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems: A Survey [56.25583236738877]
Large language model (LLM)-driven multi-agent systems (MAS) are transforming how humans and AIs collaboratively generate ideas and artifacts.<n>This is the first survey dedicated to creativity in MAS.<n>We focus on text and image generation tasks, and present: (1) a taxonomy of agent proactivity and persona design; (2) an overview of generation techniques, including divergent exploration, iterative refinement, and collaborative synthesis, as well as relevant datasets and evaluation metrics; and (3) a discussion of key challenges, such as inconsistent evaluation standards, insufficient bias mitigation, coordination conflicts, and the lack of unified benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-27T12:36:14Z) - Enterprise Architecture as a Dynamic Capability for Scalable and Sustainable Generative AI adoption: Bridging Innovation and Governance in Large Organisations [55.2480439325792]
Generative Artificial Intelligence is a powerful new technology with the potential to boost innovation and reshape governance in many industries.<n>However, organisations face major challenges in scaling GenAI, including technology complexity, governance gaps and resource misalignments.<n>This study explores how Enterprise Architecture Management can meet the complex requirements of GenAI adoption within large enterprises.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-09T07:41:33Z) - ATRAF-driven IMRaD Methodology: Tradeoff and Risk Analysis of Software Architectures Across Abstraction Levels [0.0]
evaluating architectural artifacts is essential to assess tradeoffs and risks affecting quality attributes such as performance, modifiability, and security.<n>Our prior work introduced the Architecture Tradeoff and Risk Analysis Framework (ATRAF)<n>This paper presents the ATRAF-driven IMRaD methodology, a concise method to align ATRAF's phases with IMRaD sections.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-06T15:22:28Z) - Generative AI for Software Architecture. Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions [6.883775050854466]
We aim to systematically synthesize the use, rationale, contexts, usability, and future challenges of GenAI in software architecture.<n>Our review identified significant adoption of GenAI for architectural decision support and architectural reconstruction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-17T15:49:30Z) - Evaluation of Architectural Synthesis Using Generative AI [49.1574468325115]
This paper presents a comparative evaluation of two systems: GPT-4o and Claude 3.5, in the task of architectural 3D synthesis.<n>We conduct a case study on two buildings from Palladio's Four Books of Architecture (1965): Villa Rotonda and Palazzo Porto.<n>We assess the systems' abilities in (1) interpreting 2D and 3D representations of buildings from drawings, (2) encoding the buildings into a CAD software script, and (3) self-improving based on outputs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-04T18:39:28Z) - Generative AI in the Construction Industry: A State-of-the-art Analysis [0.4241054493737716]
There is a gap in the literature on the current state, opportunities, and challenges of generative AI in the construction industry.
This study aims to review and categorize the existing and emerging generative AI opportunities and challenges in the construction industry.
It proposes a framework for construction firms to build customized generative AI solutions using their own data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-15T13:39:55Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.