Robust Uncertainty Quantification for Self-Evolving Large Language Models via Continual Domain Pretraining

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.22931v2
• Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 15:51:13 GMT
• Title: Robust Uncertainty Quantification for Self-Evolving Large Language Models via Continual Domain Pretraining
• Authors: Xiaofan Zhou, Lu Cheng,
• Abstract summary: Conformal Prediction (CP) has shown promise in offering correctness guarantees for large language models.<n>We introduce an adaptive rejection and non-exchangeable CP framework.<n>Our framework enhances both the effectiveness and reliability of CP under CDP scenarios.
• Score: 7.344577590113121
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Continual Learning (CL) is essential for enabling self-evolving large language models (LLMs) to adapt and remain effective amid rapid knowledge growth. Yet, despite its importance, little attention has been given to establishing statistical reliability guarantees for LLMs under CL, particularly in the setting of continual domain pretraining (CDP). Conformal Prediction (CP) has shown promise in offering correctness guarantees for LLMs, but it faces major challenges in CDP: testing data often stems from unknown or shifting domain distributions, under which CP may no longer provide valid guarantees. Moreover, when high coverage is required, CP can yield excessively large prediction sets for unanswerable queries, reducing informativeness. To address these challenges, we introduce an adaptive rejection and non-exchangeable CP framework. Our method first estimates the distribution of questions across domains in the test set using transformer-based clustering, then reweights or resamples the calibration data accordingly. Building on this, adaptive rejection CP allows the LLM to selectively abstain from answering when its confidence or competence shifts significantly. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our framework enhances both the effectiveness and reliability of CP under CDP scenarios. Our code is available at: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/CPCL-8C12/

Related papers

• LATA: Laplacian-Assisted Transductive Adaptation for Conformal Uncertainty in Medical VLMs [61.06744611795341]
  Medical vision-language models (VLMs) are strong zero-shot recognizers for medical imaging.<n>We propose texttttextbfLATA (Laplacian-Assisted Transductive Adaptation), a textittraining- and label-free refinement.<n>texttttextbfLATA sharpens zero-shot predictions without compromising exchangeability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-19T16:45:38Z)
• Fact-Checking with Large Language Models via Probabilistic Certainty and Consistency [7.806516365113592]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in applications requiring factual accuracy.<n>While fact-checking can mitigate these errors, existing methods typically retrieve external evidence indiscriminately.<n>We introduce Probabilistic Certainty and Consistency (PCC), a framework that estimates factual confidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-05T21:57:41Z)
• Steering Vision-Language Pre-trained Models for Incremental Face Presentation Attack Detection [62.89126207012712]
  Face Presentation Attack Detection (PAD) demands incremental learning to combat spoofing tactics and domains.<n>Privacy regulations forbid retaining past data, necessitating rehearsal-free learning (RF-IL)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-22T04:30:11Z)
• LEC: Linear Expectation Constraints for False-Discovery Control in Selective Prediction and Routing Systems [95.35293543918762]
  Large language models (LLMs) often generate unreliable answers, while uncertainty methods fail to fully distinguish correct from incorrect predictions.<n>We address this issue through the lens of false discovery rate (FDR) control, ensuring that among all accepted predictions, the proportion of errors does not exceed a target risk level.<n>We propose LEC, which reinterprets selective prediction as a constrained decision problem by enforcing a Linear Expectation Constraint.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-01T11:27:09Z)
• COIN: Uncertainty-Guarding Selective Question Answering for Foundation Models with Provable Risk Guarantees [51.5976496056012]
  COIN is an uncertainty-guarding selection framework that calibrates statistically valid thresholds to filter a single generated answer per question.<n>COIN estimates the empirical error rate on a calibration set and applies confidence interval methods to establish a high-probability upper bound on the true error rate.<n>We demonstrate COIN's robustness in risk control, strong test-time power in retaining admissible answers, and predictive efficiency under limited calibration data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-25T07:04:49Z)
• Learning Conformal Abstention Policies for Adaptive Risk Management in Large Language and Vision-Language Models [3.958317527488534]
  Large Language and Vision-Language Models (LLMs/VLMs) are increasingly used in safety-critical applications.<n>Uncertainty quantification helps assess prediction confidence and enables abstention when uncertainty is high.<n>We propose learnable abstention, integrating reinforcement learning (RL) with Conformal Prediction (CP) to optimize abstention thresholds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-08T21:30:41Z)
• Prune 'n Predict: Optimizing LLM Decision-making with Conformal Prediction [7.843594672029363]
  incorrect outputs pose significant risks in high-stakes domains like healthcare and finance.<n>We propose emphconformal revision of questions (CROQ), which revises the question by narrowing down the available choices to those in the prediction set.<n>We also propose CP-OPT, an optimization framework to learn scores that minimize set sizes while maintaining coverage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-31T17:33:12Z)
• Beyond Conformal Predictors: Adaptive Conformal Inference with Confidence Predictors [1.3812010983144802]
  This study shows that the desirable properties of Adaptive Conformal Inference (ACI) do not require the use of Conformal Predictors (CP)<n>We empirically investigate the performance of Non-Conformal Confidence Predictors (NCCP) against CP when used with ACI on non-exchangeable data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-23T21:02:33Z)
• ConU: Conformal Uncertainty in Large Language Models with Correctness Coverage Guarantees [68.33498595506941]
  We introduce a novel uncertainty measure based on self-consistency theory. We then develop a conformal uncertainty criterion by integrating the uncertainty condition aligned with correctness into the CP algorithm. Empirical evaluations indicate that our uncertainty measure outperforms prior state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-29T17:33:07Z)
• When Does Confidence-Based Cascade Deferral Suffice? [69.28314307469381]
  Cascades are a classical strategy to enable inference cost to vary adaptively across samples. A deferral rule determines whether to invoke the next classifier in the sequence, or to terminate prediction. Despite being oblivious to the structure of the cascade, confidence-based deferral often works remarkably well in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-06T04:13:57Z)
• Learning Optimal Conformal Classifiers [32.68483191509137]
  Conformal prediction (CP) is used to predict confidence sets containing the true class with a user-specified probability. This paper explores strategies to differentiate through CP during training with the goal of training model with the conformal wrapper end-to-end. We show that conformal training (ConfTr) outperforms state-of-the-art CP methods for classification by reducing the average confidence set size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-18T11:25:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.