On the Societal Impact of Machine Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.23693v1
• Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 17:59:48 GMT
• Title: On the Societal Impact of Machine Learning
• Authors: Joachim Baumann,
• Abstract summary: This thesis investigates the societal impact of machine learning (ML)<n>ML increasingly informs consequential decisions and recommendations, significantly affecting many aspects of our lives.<n>As these data-driven systems are often developed without explicit fairness considerations, they carry the risk of discriminatory effects.
• Score: 8.200229795326445
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This PhD thesis investigates the societal impact of machine learning (ML). ML increasingly informs consequential decisions and recommendations, significantly affecting many aspects of our lives. As these data-driven systems are often developed without explicit fairness considerations, they carry the risk of discriminatory effects. The contributions in this thesis enable more appropriate measurement of fairness in ML systems, systematic decomposition of ML systems to anticipate bias dynamics, and effective interventions that reduce algorithmic discrimination while maintaining system utility. I conclude by discussing ongoing challenges and future research directions as ML systems, including generative artificial intelligence, become increasingly integrated into society. This work offers a foundation for ensuring that ML's societal impact aligns with broader social values.

Related papers

• Addressing Bias in LLMs: Strategies and Application to Fair AI-based Recruitment [49.81946749379338]
  This work seeks to analyze the capacity of Transformers-based systems to learn demographic biases present in the data.<n>We propose a privacy-enhancing framework to reduce gender information from the learning pipeline as a way to mitigate biased behaviors in the final tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-13T15:29:43Z)
• Persuasion with Large Language Models: a Survey [49.86930318312291]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have created new disruptive possibilities for persuasive communication. In areas such as politics, marketing, public health, e-commerce, and charitable giving, such LLM Systems have already achieved human-level or even super-human persuasiveness. Our survey suggests that the current and future potential of LLM-based persuasion poses profound ethical and societal risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-11T10:05:52Z)
• Cognitive Biases in Large Language Models for News Recommendation [68.90354828533535]
  This paper explores the potential impact of cognitive biases on large language models (LLMs) based news recommender systems. We discuss strategies to mitigate these biases through data augmentation, prompt engineering and learning algorithms aspects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T18:42:07Z)
• Social Debiasing for Fair Multi-modal LLMs [59.61512883471714]
  Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have dramatically advanced the research field and delivered powerful vision-language understanding capabilities.<n>These models often inherit deep-rooted social biases from their training data, leading to uncomfortable responses with respect to attributes such as race and gender.<n>This paper addresses the issue of social biases in MLLMs by introducing a comprehensive counterfactual dataset with multiple social concepts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-13T02:08:32Z)
• The Impact of Machine Learning on Society: An Analysis of Current Trends and Future Implications [0.0]
  This research aimed to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the current and future impact of Machine learning on society. The research included a thorough literature review, case studies, and surveys to gather data on the economic impact of ML, ethical and privacy implications, and public perceptions of the technology. The findings of this research revealed that the majority of respondents have a moderate level of familiarity with the concept of ML, believe that it has the potential to benefit society, and think that society should prioritize the development and use of ML.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T01:10:09Z)
• Concrete Safety for ML Problems: System Safety for ML Development and Assessment [0.758305251912708]
  Concerns of trustworthiness, unintended social harms, and unacceptable social and ethical violations undermine the promise of ML advancements. Systems safety engineering is an established discipline with a proven track record of identifying and managing risks even in high-complexity sociotechnical systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-06T18:02:07Z)
• Understanding the Complexity and Its Impact on Testing in ML-Enabled Systems [8.630445165405606]
  We study Rasa 3.0, an industrial dialogue system that has been widely adopted by various companies around the world. Our goal is to characterize the complexity of such a largescale ML-enabled system and to understand the impact of the complexity on testing. Our study reveals practical implications for software engineering for ML-enabled systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-10T08:13:24Z)
• Causal Fairness Analysis [68.12191782657437]
  We introduce a framework for understanding, modeling, and possibly solving issues of fairness in decision-making settings. The main insight of our approach will be to link the quantification of the disparities present on the observed data with the underlying, and often unobserved, collection of causal mechanisms. Our effort culminates in the Fairness Map, which is the first systematic attempt to organize and explain the relationship between different criteria found in the literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-23T01:06:34Z)
• Characterizing and Detecting Mismatch in Machine-Learning-Enabled Systems [1.4695979686066065]
  Development and deployment of machine learning systems remains a challenge. In this paper, we report our findings and their implications for improving end-to-end ML-enabled system development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-25T19:40:29Z)
• Overcoming Failures of Imagination in AI Infused System Development and Deployment [71.9309995623067]
  NeurIPS 2020 requested that research paper submissions include impact statements on "potential nefarious uses and the consequences of failure" We argue that frameworks of harms must be context-aware and consider a wider range of potential stakeholders, system affordances, as well as viable proxies for assessing harms in the widest sense.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-26T18:09:52Z)
• Participatory Problem Formulation for Fairer Machine Learning Through Community Based System Dynamics [0.0]
  The problem formulation phase of ML system development can be a key source of bias that has significant downstream impacts on ML system fairness outcomes. Current practice neither accounts for the dynamic complexity of high-stakes domains nor incorporates the perspectives of vulnerable stakeholders. We introduce community based system dynamics (CBSD) as an approach to enable the participation of typically excluded stakeholders in the problem formulation phase of the ML system development process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-15T14:41:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.