Estimating cognitive biases with attention-aware inverse planning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.25951v1
• Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 20:50:04 GMT
• Title: Estimating cognitive biases with attention-aware inverse planning
• Authors: Sounak Banerjee, Daphne Cornelisse, Deepak Gopinath, Emily Sumner, Jonathan DeCastro, Guy Rosman, Eugene Vinitsky, Mark K. Ho,
• Abstract summary: People's goal-directed behaviors are influenced by their cognitive biases.<n>In inverse planning, the goal is to estimate a person's attentional biases from their actions.<n>We present an approach to attention-aware inverse planning that combines deep reinforcement learning with computational cognitive modeling.
• Score: 9.400837486470015
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: People's goal-directed behaviors are influenced by their cognitive biases, and autonomous systems that interact with people should be aware of this. For example, people's attention to objects in their environment will be biased in a way that systematically affects how they perform everyday tasks such as driving to work. Here, building on recent work in computational cognitive science, we formally articulate the attention-aware inverse planning problem, in which the goal is to estimate a person's attentional biases from their actions. We demonstrate how attention-aware inverse planning systematically differs from standard inverse reinforcement learning and how cognitive biases can be inferred from behavior. Finally, we present an approach to attention-aware inverse planning that combines deep reinforcement learning with computational cognitive modeling. We use this approach to infer the attentional strategies of RL agents in real-life driving scenarios selected from the Waymo Open Dataset, demonstrating the scalability of estimating cognitive biases with attention-aware inverse planning.

Related papers

• Attention Trajectories as a Diagnostic Axis for Deep Reinforcement Learning [4.662814261930481]
  We introduce a scientific methodology for analyzing the learning process through quantitative analysis of saliency.<n>This approach aggregates saliency information at the object and modality level into hierarchical attention profiles.<n>This methodology uncovers algorithm-specific attention biases, reveals unintended reward-driven strategies, and diagnoses overfitting to redundant sensory channels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-25T18:20:42Z)
• Think Socially via Cognitive Reasoning [94.60442643943696]
  We introduce Cognitive Reasoning, a paradigm modeled on human social cognition.<n>CogFlow is a complete framework that instills this capability in LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T16:27:29Z)
• Self-Adaptive Cognitive Debiasing for Large Language Models in Decision-Making [71.71796367760112]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown potential in supporting decision-making applications.<n>We propose a cognitive debiasing approach, self-adaptive cognitive debiasing (SACD)<n>We evaluate SACD on finance, healthcare, and legal decision-making tasks using both open-weight and closed-weight LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-05T11:23:05Z)
• Auto Detecting Cognitive Events Using Machine Learning on Pupillary Data [0.0]
  Pupil size is a valuable indicator of cognitive workload, reflecting changes in attention and arousal governed by the autonomic nervous system. This study explores the potential of using machine learning to automatically detect cognitive events experienced using individuals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T04:54:46Z)
• Modeling User Preferences via Brain-Computer Interfacing [54.3727087164445]
  We use Brain-Computer Interfacing technology to infer users' preferences, their attentional correlates towards visual content, and their associations with affective experience. We link these to relevant applications, such as information retrieval, personalized steering of generative models, and crowdsourcing population estimates of affective experiences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-15T20:41:46Z)
• Attention is all they need: Cognitive science and the (techno)political economy of attention in humans and machines [0.0]
  This paper critically analyses the "attention economy" within the framework of cognitive science and techno-political economics. We explore how current business models, particularly in digital platform capitalism, harness user engagement by strategically shaping attentional patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T13:53:46Z)
• LEADER: Learning Attention over Driving Behaviors for Planning under Uncertainty [20.408934362272163]
  Uncertainty on human behaviors poses a significant challenge to autonomous driving in crowded urban environments. We propose an algorithm, LEarning Attention over Driving bEhavioRs, that learns to attend to critical human behaviors during planning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-23T05:42:04Z)
• Personalized Detection of Cognitive Biases in Actions of Users from Their Logs: Anchoring and Recency Biases [9.445205340175555]
  We focus on two cognitive biases - anchoring and recency. The recognition of cognitive bias in computer science is largely in the domain of information retrieval. We offer a principled approach along with Machine Learning to detect these two cognitive biases from Web logs of users' actions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-30T08:51:15Z)
• AGENT: A Benchmark for Core Psychological Reasoning [60.35621718321559]
  Intuitive psychology is the ability to reason about hidden mental variables that drive observable actions. Despite recent interest in machine agents that reason about other agents, it is not clear if such agents learn or hold the core psychology principles that drive human reasoning. We present a benchmark consisting of procedurally generated 3D animations, AGENT, structured around four scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-24T14:58:23Z)
• Tracking Emotions: Intrinsic Motivation Grounded on Multi-Level Prediction Error Dynamics [68.8204255655161]
  We discuss how emotions arise when differences between expected and actual rates of progress towards a goal are experienced. We present an intrinsic motivation architecture that generates behaviors towards self-generated and dynamic goals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-29T06:53:13Z)
• Adversarial vs behavioural-based defensive AI with joint, continual and active learning: automated evaluation of robustness to deception, poisoning and concept drift [62.997667081978825]
  Recent advancements in Artificial Intelligence (AI) have brought new capabilities to behavioural analysis (UEBA) for cyber-security. In this paper, we present a solution to effectively mitigate this attack by improving the detection process and efficiently leveraging human expertise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-13T13:54:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.