Systems for Scaling Accessibility Efforts in Large Computing Courses

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.25964v1
• Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 21:05:07 GMT
• Title: Systems for Scaling Accessibility Efforts in Large Computing Courses
• Authors: Ritesh Kanchi, Miya Natsuhara, Matt X. Wang,
• Abstract summary: It is critically important to make computing courses accessible for disabled students.<n>This is particularly challenging in large computing courses, which face unique challenges due to the sheer scale of course content and staff.<n>We share our attempts to scale accessibility efforts for a large university-level introductory programming course sequence.
• Score: 0.3823356975862005
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: It is critically important to make computing courses accessible for disabled students. This is particularly challenging in large computing courses, which face unique challenges due to the sheer scale of course content and staff. In this experience report, we share our attempts to scale accessibility efforts for a large university-level introductory programming course sequence, with over 3500 enrolled students and 100 teaching assistants (TAs) per year. First, we introduce our approach to auditing and remediating course materials by systematically identifying and resolving accessibility issues. However, remediating content post-hoc is purely reactive and scales poorly. We then discuss two approaches to systems that enable proactive accessibility work. We developed technical systems to manage remediation complexity at scale: redesigning other course content to be web-first and accessible by default, providing alternate accessible views for existing course content, and writing automated tests to receive instant feedback on a subset of accessibility issues. Separately, we established human systems to empower both course staff and students in accessibility best practices: developing and running various TA-targeted accessibility trainings, establishing course-wide accessibility norms, and integrating accessibility topics into core course curriculum. Preliminary qualitative feedback from both staff and students shows increased engagement in accessibility work and accessible technologies. We close by discussing limitations and lessons learned from our work, with advice for others developing similar auditing, remediation, technical, or human systems.

Related papers

• Safeguarding Privacy: Privacy-Preserving Detection of Mind Wandering and Disengagement Using Federated Learning in Online Education [53.25191965774678]
  We propose a framework exploiting cross-device federated learning to address different manifestations of behavioral and cognitive disengagement during remote learning.<n>We fit video-based cognitive disengagement detection models using facial expressions and gaze features.<n>Our results show great promise for privacy-preserving educational technologies promoting learner engagement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-10T15:40:01Z)
• Accessibility Scout: Personalized Accessibility Scans of Built Environments [10.083187958861812]
  Assessment of accessibility of unfamiliar built environments is critical for people with disabilities.<n>Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) enable novel approaches to this problem.<n>We present Accessibility Scout, an LLM-based accessibility scanning system that identifies accessibility concerns from photos of built environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-31T02:07:31Z)
• Beyond the Classroom: Bridging the Gap Between Academia and Industry with a Hands-on Learning Approach [2.8123958518740544]
  Self-adaptive software systems have emerged as a critical focus in software design and operation.<n>A survey among practitioners identified that the lack of knowledgeable individuals has hindered its adoption in the industry.<n>We present our experience teaching a course on self-adaptive software systems that integrates theoretical knowledge and hands-on learning with industry-relevant technologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-14T21:32:25Z)
• ACCESS: Prompt Engineering for Automated Web Accessibility Violation Corrections [0.0]
  This paper presents a novel approach to correcting accessibility violations on the web by modifying the document object model (DOM) in real time with foundation models. We achieved greater than a 51% reduction in accessibility violation errors after corrections on our novel benchmark: ACCESS.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-28T22:49:33Z)
• Can Foundation Models Watch, Talk and Guide You Step by Step to Make a Cake? [62.59699229202307]
  Despite advances in AI, it remains a significant challenge to develop interactive task guidance systems. We created a new multimodal benchmark dataset, Watch, Talk and Guide (WTaG) based on natural interaction between a human user and a human instructor. We leveraged several foundation models to study to what extent these models can be quickly adapted to perceptually enabled task guidance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-01T15:13:49Z)
• Automated Distractor and Feedback Generation for Math Multiple-choice Questions via In-context Learning [43.83422798569986]
  Multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are ubiquitous in almost all levels of education since they are easy to administer, grade, and reliable form of assessment. To date, the task of crafting high-quality distractors has largely remained a labor-intensive process for teachers and learning content designers. We propose a simple, in-context learning-based solution for automated distractor and corresponding feedback message generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-07T01:03:04Z)
• UKP-SQuARE: An Interactive Tool for Teaching Question Answering [61.93372227117229]
  The exponential growth of question answering (QA) has made it an indispensable topic in any Natural Language Processing (NLP) course. We introduce UKP-SQuARE as a platform for QA education. Students can run, compare, and analyze various QA models from different perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T11:29:04Z)
• Integrating Accessibility in a Mobile App Development Course [0.0]
  The course introduced three accessibility-related topics using various interventions: Accessibility Awareness (a guest lecture by a legal expert), Technical Knowledge (lectures on Android accessibility guidelines and testing practices), and Empathy (an activity that required students to blindfold themselves and interact with their phones using a screen-reader) All students could correctly identify at least one accessibility issue in the user interface of a real-world app given its screenshot, and 90% of them could provide a correct solution to fix it.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-12T12:44:33Z)
• Teachable Reinforcement Learning via Advice Distillation [161.43457947665073]
  We propose a new supervision paradigm for interactive learning based on "teachable" decision-making systems that learn from structured advice provided by an external teacher. We show that agents that learn from advice can acquire new skills with significantly less human supervision than standard reinforcement learning algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-19T03:22:57Z)
• Self-Supervised Representation Learning: Introduction, Advances and Challenges [125.38214493654534]
  Self-supervised representation learning methods aim to provide powerful deep feature learning without the requirement of large annotated datasets. This article introduces this vibrant area including key concepts, the four main families of approach and associated state of the art, and how self-supervised methods are applied to diverse modalities of data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-18T13:51:22Z)
• ProtoTransformer: A Meta-Learning Approach to Providing Student Feedback [54.142719510638614]
  In this paper, we frame the problem of providing feedback as few-shot classification. A meta-learner adapts to give feedback to student code on a new programming question from just a few examples by instructors. Our approach was successfully deployed to deliver feedback to 16,000 student exam-solutions in a programming course offered by a tier 1 university.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-23T22:41:28Z)
• Securing Bring-Your-Own-Device (BYOD) Programming Exams [1.9164932573056916]
  Traditional pen and paper exams are inadequate for modern university programming courses. Many institutions lack the resources or space to be able to run assessments in dedicated computer labs. This has motivated the development of bring-your-own-device (BYOD) exam formats.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-12T15:01:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.