Can AI be Accountable?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.26057v1
• Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 01:16:33 GMT
• Title: Can AI be Accountable?
• Authors: Andrew L. Kun,
• Abstract summary: In general, an agent is accountable to a forum if the forum can request information from the agent about its actions.<n>In too many cases today's AI is not accountable -- we cannot question it, enter into a discussion with it, let alone sanction it.
• Score: 4.798219578937121
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The AI we use is powerful, and its power is increasing rapidly. If this powerful AI is to serve the needs of consumers, voters, and decision makers, then it is imperative that the AI is accountable. In general, an agent is accountable to a forum if the forum can request information from the agent about its actions, if the forum and the agent can discuss this information, and if the forum can sanction the agent. Unfortunately, in too many cases today's AI is not accountable -- we cannot question it, enter into a discussion with it, let alone sanction it. In this chapter we relate the general definition of accountability to AI, we illustrate what it means for AI to be accountable and unaccountable, and we explore approaches that can improve our chances of living in a world where all AI is accountable to those who are affected by it.

Related papers

• Designing AI-Enabled Countermeasures to Cognitive Warfare [0.0]
  Foreign information operations on social media platforms pose significant risks to democratic societies.<n>With the rise of Artificial Intelligence (AI), this threat is likely to intensify, potentially overwhelming human defenders.<n>This paper proposes possible AI-enabled countermeasures against cognitive warfare.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-14T11:36:03Z)
• Actionable AI: Enabling Non Experts to Understand and Configure AI Systems [5.534140394498714]
  Actionable AI allows non-experts to configure black-box agents.<n>In uncertain conditions, non-experts achieve good levels of performance.<n>We propose Actionable AI as a way to open access to AI-based agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-09T23:09:04Z)
• Superintelligence Strategy: Expert Version [64.7113737051525]
  Destabilizing AI developments could raise the odds of great-power conflict.<n>Superintelligence -- AI vastly better than humans at nearly all cognitive tasks -- is now anticipated by AI researchers.<n>We introduce the concept of Mutual Assured AI Malfunction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-07T17:53:24Z)
• Responsible AI Agents [17.712990593093316]
  Companies such as OpenAI, Google, Microsoft, and Salesforce promise their AI Agents will go from generating passive text to executing tasks.<n>The potential power of AI Agents has fueled legal scholars' fears that AI Agents will enable rogue commerce, human manipulation, rampant defamation, and intellectual property harms.<n>This Article addresses the concerns around AI Agents head on.<n>It shows that core aspects of how one piece of software interacts with another creates ways to discipline AI Agents so that rogue, undesired actions are unlikely.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T16:49:06Z)
• Artificial Influence: An Analysis Of AI-Driven Persuasion [0.0]
  We warn that ubiquitous highlypersuasive AI systems could alter our information environment so significantly so as to contribute to a loss of human control of our own future. We conclude that none of these solutions will be airtight, and that individuals and governments will need to take active steps to guard against the most pernicious effects of persuasive AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-15T16:05:11Z)
• On Avoiding Power-Seeking by Artificial Intelligence [93.9264437334683]
  We do not know how to align a very intelligent AI agent's behavior with human interests. I investigate whether we can build smart AI agents which have limited impact on the world, and which do not autonomously seek power.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-23T16:56:21Z)
• Cybertrust: From Explainable to Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) [58.981120701284816]
  Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) will incorporate explicit quantifications and visualizations of user confidence in AI recommendations. It will allow examining and testing of AI system predictions to establish a basis for trust in the systems' decision making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-26T18:53:09Z)
• Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspective [54.80482955088197]
  We focus on six of the most crucial dimensions in achieving trustworthy AI: (i) Safety & Robustness, (ii) Non-discrimination & Fairness, (iii) Explainability, (iv) Privacy, (v) Accountability & Auditability, and (vi) Environmental Well-Being. For each dimension, we review the recent related technologies according to a taxonomy and summarize their applications in real-world systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-12T14:21:46Z)
• The Threat of Offensive AI to Organizations [52.011307264694665]
  This survey explores the threat of offensive AI on organizations. First, we discuss how AI changes the adversary's methods, strategies, goals, and overall attack model. Then, through a literature review, we identify 33 offensive AI capabilities which adversaries can use to enhance their attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-30T01:03:28Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)
• Evidence-based explanation to promote fairness in AI systems [3.190891983147147]
  People make decisions and usually, they need to explain their decision to others or in some matter. In order to explain their decisions with AI support, people need to understand how AI is part of that decision. We have been exploring an evidence-based explanation design approach to 'tell the story of a decision'
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-03T14:22:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.