Stitch: Step-by-step LLM Guided Tutoring for Scratch

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.26634v1
• Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 16:03:56 GMT
• Title: Stitch: Step-by-step LLM Guided Tutoring for Scratch
• Authors: Yuan Si, Kyle Qi, Daming Li, Hanyuan Shi, Jialu Zhang,
• Abstract summary: We present Stitch, an interactive tutoring system that replaces "showing the answer" with step-by-step scaffolding.<n>We evaluate Stitch in an empirical study, comparing it against a state-of-the-art automated feedback generation tool for Scratch.
• Score: 1.8206350996077172
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Block-based environments such as Scratch are increasingly popular in programming education. While block syntax reduces surface errors, semantic bugs remain common and challenging for novices to resolve. Existing debugging workflows typically show the correct program directly to learners, a strategy that may fix errors but undermines the development of problem-solving skills. We present Stitch, an interactive tutoring system that replaces "showing the answer" with step-by-step scaffolding. The system's Diff-Analyze module contrasts a student's project with a reference implementation, identifies the most critical differences, and uses a large language model to explain why these changes matter. Learners inspect highlighted blocks through a custom rendering engine, understand the explanations, and selectively apply partial fixes. This iterative process continues until the intended functionality is achieved. We evaluate Stitch in an empirical study, comparing it against a state-of-the-art automated feedback generation tool for Scratch. Our key insight is that simply presenting the correct program is pedagogically ineffective. In contrast, our interactive, step-by-step guided system promotes a more effective learning experience. More broadly, what constitutes effective feedback in block-based programming remains an open question. Our evaluation provides new evidence that step-by-step tutoring significantly enhances learning outcomes, outperforming both direct-answer approaches and current automated feedback generation tools.

Related papers

• Automated Feedback Generation for Undergraduate Mathematics: Development and Evaluation of an AI Teaching Assistant [0.0]
  We present a system that processes free-form natural language input, handles a wide range of edge cases, and comments on the technical correctness of submitted proofs.<n>We show that by the metrics we evaluate, the quality of the feedback generated is comparable to that produced by human experts.<n>A version of our tool is deployed on the Imperial mathematics homework platform Lambda.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-06T23:02:22Z)
• Autograder+: A Multi-Faceted AI Framework for Rich Pedagogical Feedback in Programming Education [0.5529795221640363]
  Autograder+ is designed to shift autograding from a purely summative process to a formative learning experience.<n>It introduces two key capabilities: automated feedback generation using a fine-tuned Large Language Model, and visualization of student code submissions to uncover learning patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-30T11:41:50Z)
• Improving Large Language Models Function Calling and Interpretability via Guided-Structured Templates [56.73907811047611]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong reasoning and tool-use capabilities.<n>LLMs often fail in real-world tool-interactions due to incorrect parameterization, poor tool selection, or misinterpretation of user intent.<n>We introduce a curriculum-inspired framework that leverages structured reasoning templates to guide LLMs through more deliberate step-by-step instructions for generating function callings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-22T17:55:14Z)
• SimStep: Chain-of-Abstractions for Incremental Specification and Debugging of AI-Generated Interactive Simulations [16.00479720281197]
  Chain-of-Abstractions (CoA) is a way to recover programming's core affordances.<n>CoA decomposes the synthesis process into a sequence of cognitively meaningful, task-aligned representations.<n>SimStep is an authoring environment for teachers that scaffolds simulation creation through four intermediate abstractions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-13T14:54:17Z)
• RePurr: Automated Repair of Block-Based Learners' Programs [10.540099048026496]
  We introduce the first APR approach for Scratch based on evolutionary search.<n>Our RePurr prototype includes novel refinements of fault localization to improve the guidance of test suites.<n> Empirical evaluation on a set of real learners' programs confirms the anticipated challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-16T19:22:51Z)
• ReLearn: Unlearning via Learning for Large Language Models [64.2802606302194]
  We propose ReLearn, a data augmentation and fine-tuning pipeline for effective unlearning.<n>This framework introduces Knowledge Forgetting Rate (KFR) and Knowledge Retention Rate (KRR) to measure knowledge-level preservation.<n>Our experiments show that ReLearn successfully achieves targeted forgetting while preserving high-quality output.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T16:31:00Z)
• Simulated Interactive Debugging [7.3742419367796535]
  We present our approach called Simulated Interactive that interactively guides students along the debug process.<n>The guidance aims to empower the students to repair their solutions and have a proper learning experience.<n>We developed an implementation using traditional fault localization techniques and large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-16T17:47:18Z)
• Enhancing LLM Reasoning via Critique Models with Test-Time and Training-Time Supervision [120.40788744292739]
  We propose a two-player paradigm that separates the roles of reasoning and critique models. We first propose AutoMathCritique, an automated and scalable framework for collecting critique data. We demonstrate that the critique models consistently improve the actor's performance on difficult queries at test-time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-25T17:11:54Z)
• Giving Feedback on Interactive Student Programs with Meta-Exploration [74.5597783609281]
  Developing interactive software, such as websites or games, is a particularly engaging way to learn computer science. Standard approaches require instructors to manually grade student-implemented interactive programs. Online platforms that serve millions, like Code.org, are unable to provide any feedback on assignments for implementing interactive programs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-16T10:00:23Z)
• ProtoTransformer: A Meta-Learning Approach to Providing Student Feedback [54.142719510638614]
  In this paper, we frame the problem of providing feedback as few-shot classification. A meta-learner adapts to give feedback to student code on a new programming question from just a few examples by instructors. Our approach was successfully deployed to deliver feedback to 16,000 student exam-solutions in a programming course offered by a tier 1 university.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-23T22:41:28Z)
• Distilling Knowledge via Knowledge Review [69.15050871776552]
  We study the factor of connection path cross levels between teacher and student networks, and reveal its great importance. For the first time in knowledge distillation, cross-stage connection paths are proposed. Our finally designed nested and compact framework requires negligible overhead, and outperforms other methods on a variety of tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-19T04:36:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.