HADSF: Aspect Aware Semantic Control for Explainable Recommendation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.26994v2
• Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2025 19:51:14 GMT
• Title: HADSF: Aspect Aware Semantic Control for Explainable Recommendation
• Authors: Zheng Nie, Peijie Sun,
• Abstract summary: Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) promise more effective information extraction for recommender systems.<n>We propose a two-stage approach that induces a compact, corpus-level aspect vocabulary via adaptive selection and then performs vocabulary-guided, explicitly constrained extraction of structured aspect-opinion triples.<n> Experiments on approximately 3 million reviews spanning 1.5B-70B parameters show that, when integrated into standard rating predictors, HADSF yields consistent reductions in prediction error.
• Score: 4.75127493865044
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) promise more effective information extraction for review-based recommender systems, yet current methods still (i) mine free-form reviews without scope control, producing redundant and noisy representations, (ii) lack principled metrics that link LLM hallucination to downstream effectiveness, and (iii) leave the cost-quality trade-off across model scales largely unexplored. We address these gaps with the Hyper-Adaptive Dual-Stage Semantic Framework (HADSF), a two-stage approach that first induces a compact, corpus-level aspect vocabulary via adaptive selection and then performs vocabulary-guided, explicitly constrained extraction of structured aspect-opinion triples. To assess the fidelity of the resulting representations, we introduce Aspect Drift Rate (ADR) and Opinion Fidelity Rate (OFR) and empirically uncover a nonmonotonic relationship between hallucination severity and rating prediction error. Experiments on approximately 3 million reviews across LLMs spanning 1.5B-70B parameters show that, when integrated into standard rating predictors, HADSF yields consistent reductions in prediction error and enables smaller models to achieve competitive performance in representative deployment scenarios. We release code, data pipelines, and metric implementations to support reproducible research on hallucination-aware, LLM-enhanced explainable recommendation. Code is available at https://github.com/niez233/HADSF

Related papers

• Steering and Rectifying Latent Representation Manifolds in Frozen Multi-modal LLMs for Video Anomaly Detection [52.5174167737992]
  Video anomaly detection (VAD) aims to identify abnormal events in videos.<n>We propose SteerVAD, which advances MLLM-based VAD by shifting from passively reading to actively steering and rectifying internal representations.<n>Our method achieves state-of-the-art performance among tuning-free approaches requiring only 1% of training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T13:48:50Z)
• ConsistentRFT: Reducing Visual Hallucinations in Flow-based Reinforcement Fine-Tuning [85.20505958752928]
  Reinforcement Fine-Tuning (RFT) on flow-based models is crucial for preference alignment.<n>RFT often introduce visual hallucinations like over-optimized details and semantic misalignment.<n>This work preliminarily explores why visual hallucinations arise and how to reduce them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T11:49:46Z)
• LLM-Assisted Pseudo-Relevance Feedback [5.10348690267577]
  Pseudo-relevance feedback methods, such as RM3, estimate an expanded query model from the top-ranked documents.<n>We propose a hybrid alternative that preserves the robustness and interpretability of classical PRF while leveraging semantic judgement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-16T12:31:43Z)
• Ground What You See: Hallucination-Resistant MLLMs via Caption Feedback, Diversity-Aware Sampling, and Conflict Regularization [38.469173375694076]
  This paper systematically analyzes the root causes of hallucinations in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs)<n>It identifies three critical factors: (1) an over-reliance on chained visual reasoning, where inaccurate initial descriptions anchor subsequent inferences to incorrect premises; (2) insufficient exploration diversity during policy optimization, leading the model to generate overly confident but erroneous outputs; and (3) destructive conflicts between training samples, where NTK similarity causes false associations and unstable parameter updates.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed method significantly reduces hallucination rates and effectively enhances the inference accuracy of MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-09T07:59:18Z)
• Fidelity-Aware Recommendation Explanations via Stochastic Path Integration [14.312396553281316]
  Explanation fidelity, which measures how accurately an explanation reflects a model's true reasoning, remains critically underexplored in recommender systems.<n>We introduce SPINRec, a model-agnostic approach that adapts path-integration techniques to the sparse and implicit nature of recommendation data.<n>SPINRec consistently outperforms all baselines, establishing a new benchmark for faithful explainability in recommendation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-22T12:59:04Z)
• DeLeaker: Dynamic Inference-Time Reweighting For Semantic Leakage Mitigation in Text-to-Image Models [55.30555646945055]
  Text-to-Image (T2I) models are vulnerable to semantic leakage.<n>We introduce DeLeaker, a lightweight approach that mitigates leakage by directly intervening on the model's attention maps.<n>SLIM is the first dataset dedicated to semantic leakage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-16T17:39:21Z)
• A Novel Generative Model with Causality Constraint for Mitigating Biases in Recommender Systems [20.672668625179526]
  Latent confounding bias can obscure the true causal relationship between user feedback and item exposure.<n>We propose a novel generative framework called Latent Causality Constraints for Debiasing representation learning in Recommender Systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T14:09:39Z)
• Supervised Optimism Correction: Be Confident When LLMs Are Sure [91.7459076316849]
  We establish a novel theoretical connection between supervised fine-tuning and offline reinforcement learning.<n>We show that the widely used beam search method suffers from unacceptable over-optimism.<n>We propose Supervised Optimism Correction, which introduces a simple yet effective auxiliary loss for token-level $Q$-value estimations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T07:50:03Z)
• Closed-Loop Unsupervised Representation Disentanglement with $β$-VAE Distillation and Diffusion Probabilistic Feedback [26.935057415769876]
  Representation disentanglement may help AI fundamentally understand the real world and thus benefit both discrimination and generation tasks.<n>We propose a textbfCL-Disentanglement approach dubbed textbfCL-Dis.<n>Experiments demonstrate the superiority of CL-Dis on applications like real image manipulation and visual analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-04T05:03:22Z)
• RDR: the Recap, Deliberate, and Respond Method for Enhanced Language Understanding [6.738409533239947]
  The Recap, Deliberate, and Respond (RDR) paradigm addresses this issue by incorporating three distinct objectives within the neural network pipeline. By cascading these three models, we mitigate the potential for gaming the benchmark and establish a robust method for capturing the underlying semantic patterns. Our results demonstrate improved performance compared to competitive baselines, with an enhancement of up to 2% on standard metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-15T16:41:48Z)
• HyPoradise: An Open Baseline for Generative Speech Recognition with Large Language Models [81.56455625624041]
  We introduce the first open-source benchmark to utilize external large language models (LLMs) for ASR error correction. The proposed benchmark contains a novel dataset, HyPoradise (HP), encompassing more than 334,000 pairs of N-best hypotheses. LLMs with reasonable prompt and its generative capability can even correct those tokens that are missing in N-best list.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-27T14:44:10Z)
• Elastic Weight Removal for Faithful and Abstractive Dialogue Generation [61.40951756070646]
  A dialogue system should generate responses that are faithful to the knowledge contained in relevant documents. Many models generate hallucinated responses instead that contradict it or contain unverifiable information. We show that our method can be extended to simultaneously discourage hallucinations and extractive responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-30T17:40:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.