Bayesian model selection and misspecification testing in imaging inverse problems only from noisy and partial measurements

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.27663v1
• Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 17:32:11 GMT
• Title: Bayesian model selection and misspecification testing in imaging inverse problems only from noisy and partial measurements
• Authors: Tom Sprunck, Marcelo Pereyra, Tobias Liaudat,
• Abstract summary: We propose a general methodology for unsupervised model selection and misspecification detection in Bayesian imaging sciences.<n>We achieve excellent selection and detection accuracy with a low computational cost.
• Score: 1.4337588659482519
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Modern imaging techniques heavily rely on Bayesian statistical models to address difficult image reconstruction and restoration tasks. This paper addresses the objective evaluation of such models in settings where ground truth is unavailable, with a focus on model selection and misspecification diagnosis. Existing unsupervised model evaluation methods are often unsuitable for computational imaging due to their high computational cost and incompatibility with modern image priors defined implicitly via machine learning models. We herein propose a general methodology for unsupervised model selection and misspecification detection in Bayesian imaging sciences, based on a novel combination of Bayesian cross-validation and data fission, a randomized measurement splitting technique. The approach is compatible with any Bayesian imaging sampler, including diffusion and plug-and-play samplers. We demonstrate the methodology through experiments involving various scoring rules and types of model misspecification, where we achieve excellent selection and detection accuracy with a low computational cost.

Related papers

• Sample-efficient evidence estimation of score based priors for model selection [9.813689581505548]
  We propose an estimator of the model evidence of a diffusion prior by integrating over the time-marginals of posterior sampling methods.<n>Our method leverages the large amount of intermediate samples naturally obtained during the reverse diffusion sampling process.<n>It is able to both select the correct diffusion model prior and diagnose prior misfit under different highly ill-conditioned, non-linear inverse problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-24T05:06:46Z)
• On Equivariant Model Selection through the Lens of Uncertainty [49.137341292207]
  Equivariant models leverage prior knowledge on symmetries to improve predictive performance, but misspecified architectural constraints can harm it instead.<n>We compare frequentist (via Conformal Prediction), Bayesian (via the marginal likelihood), and calibration-based measures to naive error-based evaluation.<n>We find that uncertainty metrics generally align with predictive performance, but Bayesian model evidence does so inconsistently.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-23T13:35:06Z)
• Unsupervised Imaging Inverse Problems with Diffusion Distribution Matching [35.01013208265617]
  This work addresses image restoration tasks through the lens of inverse problems using unpaired datasets.<n>The proposed method operates under minimal assumptions and relies only on small, unpaired datasets.<n>It is particularly well-suited for real-world scenarios, where the forward model is often unknown or misspecified.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-17T15:06:43Z)
• Trustworthy image-to-image translation: evaluating uncertainty calibration in unpaired training scenarios [0.0]
  Mammographic screening is an effective method for detecting breast cancer, facilitating early diagnosis.<n>Deep neural networks have been shown effective in some studies, but their tendency to overfit leaves considerable risk for poor generalisation and misdiagnosis.<n>Data augmentation schemes based on unpaired neural style transfer models have been proposed that improve generalisability.<n>We evaluate their performance when trained on image patches parsed from three open access mammography datasets and one non-medical image dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-29T11:09:50Z)
• Epistemic Uncertainty for Generated Image Detection [107.62647907393377]
  We introduce a novel framework for AI-generated image detection through epistemic uncertainty, aiming to address critical security concerns in the era of generative models.<n>Our key insight stems from the observation that distributional discrepancies between training and testing data manifest distinctively in the epistemic uncertainty space of machine learning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-08T11:32:25Z)
• Reinforcing Pre-trained Models Using Counterfactual Images [54.26310919385808]
  This paper proposes a novel framework to reinforce classification models using language-guided generated counterfactual images. We identify model weaknesses by testing the model using the counterfactual image dataset. We employ the counterfactual images as an augmented dataset to fine-tune and reinforce the classification model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T08:07:14Z)
• Deep Learning-Based Defect Classification and Detection in SEM Images [1.9206693386750882]
  In particular, we train RetinaNet models using different ResNet, VGGNet architectures as backbone. We propose a preference-based ensemble strategy to combine the output predictions from different models in order to achieve better performance on classification and detection of defects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-20T16:34:11Z)
• Fake It Till You Make It: Near-Distribution Novelty Detection by Score-Based Generative Models [54.182955830194445]
  existing models either fail or face a dramatic drop under the so-called near-distribution" setting. We propose to exploit a score-based generative model to produce synthetic near-distribution anomalous data. Our method improves the near-distribution novelty detection by 6% and passes the state-of-the-art by 1% to 5% across nine novelty detection benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-28T02:02:53Z)
• MDN-VO: Estimating Visual Odometry with Confidence [34.8860186009308]
  Visual Odometry (VO) is used in many applications including robotics and autonomous systems. We propose a deep learning-based VO model to estimate 6-DoF poses, as well as a confidence model for these estimates. Our experiments show that the proposed model exceeds state-of-the-art performance in addition to detecting failure cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-23T19:26:04Z)
• Deblurring via Stochastic Refinement [85.42730934561101]
  We present an alternative framework for blind deblurring based on conditional diffusion models. Our method is competitive in terms of distortion metrics such as PSNR.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-05T04:36:09Z)
• Training on Test Data with Bayesian Adaptation for Covariate Shift [96.3250517412545]
  Deep neural networks often make inaccurate predictions with unreliable uncertainty estimates. We derive a Bayesian model that provides for a well-defined relationship between unlabeled inputs under distributional shift and model parameters. We show that our method improves both accuracy and uncertainty estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-27T01:09:08Z)
• A Hierarchical Transformation-Discriminating Generative Model for Few Shot Anomaly Detection [93.38607559281601]
  We devise a hierarchical generative model that captures the multi-scale patch distribution of each training image. The anomaly score is obtained by aggregating the patch-based votes of the correct transformation across scales and image regions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-29T17:49:48Z)
• Uncertainty-aware Generalized Adaptive CycleGAN [44.34422859532988]
  Unpaired image-to-image translation refers to learning inter-image-domain mapping in an unsupervised manner. Existing methods often learn deterministic mappings without explicitly modelling the robustness to outliers or predictive uncertainty. We propose a novel probabilistic method called Uncertainty-aware Generalized Adaptive Cycle Consistency (UGAC)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-23T15:22:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.