A CPU-Centric Perspective on Agentic AI

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.00739v1
• Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2025 23:46:44 GMT
• Title: A CPU-Centric Perspective on Agentic AI
• Authors: Ritik Raj, Hong Wang, Tushar Krishna,
• Abstract summary: Agentic AI frameworks add a decision-making orchestrator embedded with external tools, including web search, Python interpreter, contextual database, and others.<n>This paper aims to characterize and understand the system bottlenecks introduced by agentic AI workloads from a CPU-centric perspective.
• Score: 8.417523196411574
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Agentic AI frameworks add a decision-making orchestrator embedded with external tools, including web search, Python interpreter, contextual database, and others, on top of monolithic LLMs, turning them from passive text oracles into autonomous problem-solvers that can plan, call tools, remember past steps, and adapt on the fly. This paper aims to characterize and understand the system bottlenecks introduced by agentic AI workloads from a largely overlooked CPU-centric perspective. We first systematically characterize Agentic AI on the basis of orchestrator/decision making component, inference path dynamics and repetitiveness of the agentic flow which directly influences the system-level performance. Thereafter, based on the characterization, we choose five representative agentic AI workloads- Haystack RAG, Toolformer, ChemCrow, Langchain and SWE-Agent to profile latency, throughput and energy metrics and demystify the significant impact of CPUs on these metrics relative to GPUs. We observe that - 1. Tool processing on CPUs can take up to 90.6% of the total latency; 2. Agentic throughput gets bottlenecked either by CPU factors - coherence, synchronization and over-subscription of cores or GPU factors - main memory capacity and bandwidth; \circled{3} CPU dynamic energy consumes up to 44% of the total dynamic energy at large batch sizes. Based on the profiling insights, we present two key optimizations- 1. CPU and GPU-Aware Micro-batching (CGAM) and 2. Mixed Agentic Workload Scheduling (MAWS) for homogeneous and heterogeneous agentic workloads respectively to demonstrate the potential to improve the performance, efficiency, and scalability of agentic AI. We achieve up to 2.1x and 1.41x P50 latency speedup compared to the multi-processing benchmark for homogeneous and heterogeneous agentic workloads respectively.

Related papers

• AgentArk: Distilling Multi-Agent Intelligence into a Single LLM Agent [57.10083973844841]
  AgentArk is a novel framework to distill multi-agent dynamics into the weights of a single model.<n>We investigate three hierarchical distillation strategies across various models, tasks, scaling, and scenarios.<n>By shifting the burden of computation from inference to training, the distilled models preserve the efficiency of one agent while exhibiting strong reasoning and self-correction performance of multiple agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T19:18:28Z)
• Towards Efficient Agents: A Co-Design of Inference Architecture and System [66.59916327634639]
  This paper presents AgentInfer, a unified framework for end-to-end agent acceleration.<n>We decompose the problem into four synergistic components: AgentCollab, AgentSched, AgentSAM, and AgentCompress.<n>Experiments on the BrowseComp-zh and DeepDiver benchmarks demonstrate that through the synergistic collaboration of these methods, AgentInfer reduces ineffective token consumption by over 50%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-20T12:06:13Z)
• Agent0: Unleashing Self-Evolving Agents from Zero Data via Tool-Integrated Reasoning [84.70211451226835]
  Large Language Model (LLM) Agents are constrained by a dependency on human-curated data.<n>We introduce Agent0, a fully autonomous framework that evolves high-performing agents without external data.<n>Agent0 substantially boosts reasoning capabilities, improving the Qwen3-8B-Base model by 18% on mathematical reasoning and 24% on general reasoning benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-20T05:01:57Z)
• MCP-Orchestrated Multi-Agent System for Automated Disinformation Detection [84.75972919995398]
  This paper presents a multi-agent system that uses relation extraction to detect disinformation in news articles.<n>The proposed Agentic AI system combines four agents: (i) a machine learning agent (logistic regression), (ii) a Wikipedia knowledge check agent, and (iv) a web-scraped data analyzer.<n>Results demonstrate that the multi-agent ensemble achieves 95.3% accuracy with an F1 score of 0.964, significantly outperforming individual agents and traditional approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-13T19:14:48Z)
• Agent.xpu: Efficient Scheduling of Agentic LLM Workloads on Heterogeneous SoC [11.82567747365518]
  This paper introduces Agent.xpu, an efficient serving system for agentic LLM workloads on memory-unified heterogeneous SOCs.<n>With dedicated offline profiling, Agent.xpu first constructs a heterogeneous execution graph, which fuses and chunks model kernels for affinity-guided, elastic accelerator mapping.<n>At runtime, its online scheduler enables fine-grained, kernel-level preemption to guarantee the responsiveness of reactive tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-30T16:50:48Z)
• Characterizing and Optimizing LLM Inference Workloads on CPU-GPU Coupled Architectures [3.2645124275315163]
  Large language model (LLM)-based inference workloads increasingly dominate data center costs and resource utilization.<n>This paper presents an in-depth analysis of inference behavior on loosely-coupled ( PCIe A100/H100) and closely-coupled (GH200) systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-16T04:02:39Z)
• STEVE: A Step Verification Pipeline for Computer-use Agent Training [84.24814828303163]
  STEVE is a step verification pipeline for computer-use agent training.<n> GPT-4o is used to verify the correctness of each step in the trajectories based on the screens before and after the action execution.<n>Our agent outperforms supervised finetuning by leveraging both positive and negative actions within a trajectory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-16T14:53:43Z)
• Characterizing Mobile SoC for Accelerating Heterogeneous LLM Inference [11.755602920122803]
  HeteroInfer is the fastest LLM inference engine in mobile devices which supports GPU-NPU heterogeneous execution.<n> Evaluation shows that HeteroInfer delivers a 1.34x to 6.02x end-to-end speedup over state-of-the-art GPU-NPU engines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-11T02:42:02Z)
• Benchmarking Edge AI Platforms for High-Performance ML Inference [0.0]
  Edge computing's growing prominence, due to its ability to reduce communication latency and enable real-time processing, is promoting the rise of high-performance, heterogeneous System-on-Chip solutions. While current approaches often involve scaling down modern hardware, the performance characteristics of neural network workloads can vary significantly. We compare the latency and throughput of various linear algebra and neural network inference tasks across CPU-only, CPU/GPU, and CPU/NPU integrated solutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-23T08:27:27Z)
• A Dynamic LLM-Powered Agent Network for Task-Oriented Agent Collaboration [55.35849138235116]
  We propose automatically selecting a team of agents from candidates to collaborate in a dynamic communication structure toward different tasks and domains. Specifically, we build a framework named Dynamic LLM-Powered Agent Network ($textDyLAN$) for LLM-powered agent collaboration. We demonstrate that DyLAN outperforms strong baselines in code generation, decision-making, general reasoning, and arithmetic reasoning tasks with moderate computational cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T16:05:48Z)
• Harnessing Deep Learning and HPC Kernels via High-Level Loop and Tensor Abstractions on CPU Architectures [67.47328776279204]
  This work introduces a framework to develop efficient, portable Deep Learning and High Performance Computing kernels. We decompose the kernel development in two steps: 1) Expressing the computational core using Processing Primitives (TPPs) and 2) Expressing the logical loops around TPPs in a high-level, declarative fashion. We demonstrate the efficacy of our approach using standalone kernels and end-to-end workloads that outperform state-of-the-art implementations on diverse CPU platforms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-25T05:04:44Z)
• AIPerf: Automated machine learning as an AI-HPC benchmark [17.57686674304368]
  We propose an end-to-end benchmark suite utilizing automated machine learning (AutoML) We implement the algorithms in a highly parallel and flexible way to ensure the efficiency and optimization potential on diverse systems. With flexible workload and single metric, our benchmark can scale and rank AI- HPC easily.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-17T08:06:43Z)
• Optimizing Deep Learning Recommender Systems' Training On CPU Cluster Architectures [56.69373580921888]
  We focus on Recommender Systems which account for most of the AI cycles in cloud computing centers. By enabling it to run on latest CPU hardware and software tailored for HPC, we are able to achieve more than two-orders of magnitude improvement in performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-10T14:40:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.