Learning When to Quit in Sales Conversations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.01181v1
• Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2025 03:14:51 GMT
• Title: Learning When to Quit in Sales Conversations
• Authors: Emaad Manzoor, Eva Ascarza, Oded Netzer,
• Abstract summary: Salespeople frequently face the dynamic screening decision of whether to persist in a conversation or abandon it to pursue the next lead.<n>We formalize the dynamic screening decision as an optimal stopping problem and develop a generative language model-based sequential decision agent.<n>Our approach handles high-dimensional textual states, scales to large language models, and works with both open-source and proprietary language models.
• Score: 0.09558392439655013
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Salespeople frequently face the dynamic screening decision of whether to persist in a conversation or abandon it to pursue the next lead. Yet, little is known about how these decisions are made, whether they are efficient, or how to improve them. We study these decisions in the context of high-volume outbound sales where leads are ample, but time is scarce and failure is common. We formalize the dynamic screening decision as an optimal stopping problem and develop a generative language model-based sequential decision agent - a stopping agent - that learns whether and when to quit conversations by imitating a retrospectively-inferred optimal stopping policy. Our approach handles high-dimensional textual states, scales to large language models, and works with both open-source and proprietary language models. When applied to calls from a large European telecommunications firm, our stopping agent reduces the time spent on failed calls by 54% while preserving nearly all sales; reallocating the time saved increases expected sales by up to 37%. Upon examining the linguistic cues that drive salespeople's quitting decisions, we find that they tend to overweight a few salient expressions of consumer disinterest and mispredict call failure risk, suggesting cognitive bounds on their ability to make real-time conversational decisions. Our findings highlight the potential of artificial intelligence algorithms to correct cognitively-bounded human decisions and improve salesforce efficiency.

Related papers

• PEARL: Self-Evolving Assistant for Time Management with Reinforcement Learning [50.81994347448835]
  We propose PEARL, a reinforcement-learning framework that augments language agent with an external memory module and optimized round-wise reward design.<n>Experiments on CalBench show that PEARL achieves 0.76 error reduction rate, and 55% in average error rate compared to the strongest baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-17T08:19:18Z)
• Evaluating Language Model Reasoning about Confidential Information [95.64687778185703]
  We study whether language models exhibit contextual robustness, or the capability to adhere to context-dependent safety specifications.<n>We develop a benchmark (PasswordEval) that measures whether language models can correctly determine when a user request is authorized.<n>We find that current open- and closed-source models struggle with this seemingly simple task, and that, perhaps surprisingly, reasoning capabilities do not generally improve performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-27T15:39:46Z)
• Detect, Explain, Escalate: Low-Carbon Dialogue Breakdown Management for LLM-Powered Agents [30.13634341221476]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are transforming numerous applications, but their susceptibility to conversational breakdowns remains a critical challenge undermining user trust.<n>This paper introduces a "Detect, Explain, Escalate" framework to manage dialogue breakdowns in LLM-powered agents, emphasizing low-carbon operation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-26T07:51:05Z)
• Silent Abandonment in Text-Based Contact Centers: Identifying, Quantifying, and Mitigating its Operational Impacts [0.5312303275762104]
  We show that 3%-70% of customers across 17 companies abandon silently.<n>In one study, 71.3% of abandoning customers did so silently, reducing agent efficiency by 3.2% and system capacity by 15.3%.<n>We suggest strategies to operationally mitigate the impact of silent abandonment by predicting suspected silent-abandonment behavior or changing service design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-15T15:38:56Z)
• DebUnc: Improving Large Language Model Agent Communication With Uncertainty Metrics [52.242449026151846]
  Multi-agent debates have been introduced to improve the accuracy of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We propose DebUnc, a debate framework that uses uncertainty metrics to assess agent confidence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-08T22:15:01Z)
• Balancing Rigor and Utility: Mitigating Cognitive Biases in Large Language Models for Multiple-Choice Questions [0.46873264197900916]
  We show that certain cognitive biases can enhance decision-making efficiency through rational deviations and shortcuts.<n>By introducing moderation and an abstention option, we reduce error rates, improve decision accuracy, and optimize decision rates.<n>This approach offers a novel way to leverage cognitive biases to improve the practical utility of large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-16T16:25:22Z)
• Deal, or no deal (or who knows)? Forecasting Uncertainty in Conversations using Large Language Models [45.41542983671774]
  How well can language models represent inherent uncertainty in conversations? We propose FortUne Dial, an expansion of the long-standing "conversation forecasting" task. We study two ways in which language models potentially represent outcome uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-05T18:39:47Z)
• Online Decision Mediation [72.80902932543474]
  Consider learning a decision support assistant to serve as an intermediary between (oracle) expert behavior and (imperfect) human behavior. In clinical diagnosis, fully-autonomous machine behavior is often beyond ethical affordances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-28T05:59:43Z)
• Silent Abandonment in Contact Centers: Estimating Customer Patience from Uncertain Data [0.0]
  We focus on the impact of silent abandonment by customers on contact centers. Customers leave the system while waiting for a reply to their inquiry, but give no indication of doing so. We develop methodologies to identify silent-abandonment customers in two types of contact centers: chat and messaging systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-23T21:43:03Z)
• Inverse Online Learning: Understanding Non-Stationary and Reactionary Policies [79.60322329952453]
  We show how to develop interpretable representations of how agents make decisions. By understanding the decision-making processes underlying a set of observed trajectories, we cast the policy inference problem as the inverse to this online learning problem. We introduce a practical algorithm for retrospectively estimating such perceived effects, alongside the process through which agents update them. Through application to the analysis of UNOS organ donation acceptance decisions, we demonstrate that our approach can bring valuable insights into the factors that govern decision processes and how they change over time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-14T17:40:42Z)
• Inverse Active Sensing: Modeling and Understanding Timely Decision-Making [111.07204912245841]
  We develop a framework for the general setting of evidence-based decision-making under endogenous, context-dependent time pressure. We demonstrate how it enables modeling intuitive notions of surprise, suspense, and optimality in decision strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-25T02:30:45Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.