How to Evaluate Speech Translation with Source-Aware Neural MT Metrics

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.03295v2
• Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 01:52:41 GMT
• Title: How to Evaluate Speech Translation with Source-Aware Neural MT Metrics
• Authors: Mauro Cettolo, Marco Gaido, Matteo Negri, Sara Papi, Luisa Bentivogli,
• Abstract summary: In machine translation, neural metrics incorporating the source text achieve stronger correlation with human judgments.<n>In this work, we conduct the first systematic study of source-aware metrics for speech-to-text translation.<n>We introduce a novel two-step cross-lingual re-segmentation algorithm to address the alignment mismatch between synthetic sources and reference translations.
• Score: 32.41110835446445
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Automatic evaluation of speech-to-text translation (ST) systems is typically performed by comparing translation hypotheses with one or more reference translations. While effective to some extent, this approach inherits the limitation of reference-based evaluation that ignores valuable information from the source input. In machine translation (MT), recent progress has shown that neural metrics incorporating the source text achieve stronger correlation with human judgments. Extending this idea to ST, however, is not trivial because the source is audio rather than text, and reliable transcripts or alignments between source and references are often unavailable. In this work, we conduct the first systematic study of source-aware metrics for ST, with a particular focus on real-world operating conditions where source transcripts are not available. We explore two complementary strategies for generating textual proxies of the input audio, automatic speech recognition (ASR) transcripts, and back-translations of the reference translation, and introduce a novel two-step cross-lingual re-segmentation algorithm to address the alignment mismatch between synthetic sources and reference translations. Our experiments, carried out on two ST benchmarks covering 79 language pairs and six ST systems with diverse architectures and performance levels, show that ASR transcripts constitute a more reliable synthetic source than back-translations when word error rate is below 20%, while back-translations always represent a computationally cheaper but still effective alternative. Furthermore, our cross-lingual re-segmentation algorithm enables robust use of source-aware MT metrics in ST evaluation, paving the way toward more accurate and principled evaluation methodologies for speech translation.

Related papers

• Evaluating Extremely Low-Resource Machine Translation: A Comparative Study of ChrF++ and BLEU Metrics [69.2321983942375]
  This work presents a comparative analysis of BLEU, an n-gram-based metric, and ChrF++, a character-based metric, for MT evaluation in ELRL settings.<n>We examine how each metric responds to translation artifacts, including hallucinations, repetition, source-text copying, and diacritic (textitmatra) variations across three ELRLs: Magahi, Bhojpuri, and Chhattisgarhi.<n>While recent work often relies solely on ChrF++, our findings show that BLEU, despite its lower absolute scores, provides complementary lexical-precision insights that improve interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-19T14:56:42Z)
• Beyond Literal Mapping: Benchmarking and Improving Non-Literal Translation Evaluation [57.11989521509119]
  We propose a novel agentic translation evaluation framework, centered by a reflective Core Agent that invokes specialized sub-agents.<n> Experimental results indicate the efficacy of RATE, achieving an improvement of at least 3.2 meta score compared with current metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-12T09:03:42Z)
• Audio-Based Crowd-Sourced Evaluation of Machine Translation Quality [3.7842130830138943]
  Machine Translation (MT) has achieved remarkable performance, with growing interest in speech translation and multimodal approaches.<n>This study compares text-only and audio-based evaluations of 10 MT systems from the WMT General MT Shared Task.<n>Crowd-sourced assessments based on audio yield rankings largely consistent with text only evaluations but, in some cases, identify significant differences between translation systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-17T14:27:17Z)
• Understanding In-Context Machine Translation for Low-Resource Languages: A Case Study on Manchu [53.437954702561065]
  In-context machine translation (MT) with large language models (LLMs) is a promising approach for low-resource MT.<n>This study systematically investigates how each type of resource, e.g., dictionary, grammar book, and retrieved parallel examples, affect the translation performance.<n>Our results indicate that high-quality dictionaries and good parallel examples are very helpful, while grammars hardly help.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T14:53:49Z)
• Chain-of-Translation Prompting (CoTR): A Novel Prompting Technique for Low Resource Languages [0.4499833362998489]
  Chain of Translation Prompting (CoTR) is a novel strategy designed to enhance the performance of language models in low-resource languages.<n>CoTR restructures prompts to first translate the input context from a low-resource language into a higher-resource language, such as English.<n>We demonstrate the effectiveness of this method through a case study on the low-resource Indic language Marathi.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-06T17:15:17Z)
• BiVert: Bidirectional Vocabulary Evaluation using Relations for Machine Translation [4.651581292181871]
  We propose a bidirectional semantic-based evaluation method designed to assess the sense distance of the translation from the source text. This approach employs the comprehensive multilingual encyclopedic dictionary BabelNet. Factual analysis shows a strong correlation between the average evaluation scores generated by our method and the human assessments across various machine translation systems for English-German language pair.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-06T08:02:21Z)
• Prosody in Cascade and Direct Speech-to-Text Translation: a case study on Korean Wh-Phrases [79.07111754406841]
  This work proposes using contrastive evaluation to measure the ability of direct S2TT systems to disambiguate utterances where prosody plays a crucial role. Our results clearly demonstrate the value of direct translation systems over cascade translation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-01T14:46:35Z)
• DiariST: Streaming Speech Translation with Speaker Diarization [53.595990270899414]
  We propose DiariST, the first streaming ST and SD solution. It is built upon a neural transducer-based streaming ST system and integrates token-level serialized output training and t-vector. Our system achieves a strong ST and SD capability compared to offline systems based on Whisper, while performing streaming inference for overlapping speech.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-14T19:33:27Z)
• Back Translation for Speech-to-text Translation Without Transcripts [11.13240570688547]
  We develop a back translation algorithm for ST (BT4ST) to synthesize pseudo ST data from monolingual target data. To ease the challenges posed by short-to-long generation and one-to-many mapping, we introduce self-supervised discrete units. With our synthetic ST data, we achieve an average boost of 2.3 BLEU on MuST-C En-De, En-Fr, and En-Es datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-15T15:12:40Z)
• Source and Target Bidirectional Knowledge Distillation for End-to-end Speech Translation [88.78138830698173]
  We focus on sequence-level knowledge distillation (SeqKD) from external text-based NMT models. We train a bilingual E2E-ST model to predict paraphrased transcriptions as an auxiliary task with a single decoder.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-13T19:00:51Z)
• On the Limitations of Cross-lingual Encoders as Exposed by Reference-Free Machine Translation Evaluation [55.02832094101173]
  Evaluation of cross-lingual encoders is usually performed either via zero-shot cross-lingual transfer in supervised downstream tasks or via unsupervised cross-lingual similarity. This paper concerns ourselves with reference-free machine translation (MT) evaluation where we directly compare source texts to (sometimes low-quality) system translations. We systematically investigate a range of metrics based on state-of-the-art cross-lingual semantic representations obtained with pretrained M-BERT and LASER. We find that they perform poorly as semantic encoders for reference-free MT evaluation and identify their two key limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-03T22:10:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.