Do Androids Dream of Unseen Puppeteers? Probing for a Conspiracy Mindset in Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.03699v1
• Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2025 18:28:28 GMT
• Title: Do Androids Dream of Unseen Puppeteers? Probing for a Conspiracy Mindset in Large Language Models
• Authors: Francesco Corso, Francesco Pierri, Gianmarco De Francisci Morales,
• Abstract summary: We investigate whether Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit conspiratorial tendencies, whether they display sociodemographic biases in this domain, and how easily they can be conditioned into adopting conspiratorial perspectives.
• Score: 6.909716378472136
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In this paper, we investigate whether Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit conspiratorial tendencies, whether they display sociodemographic biases in this domain, and how easily they can be conditioned into adopting conspiratorial perspectives. Conspiracy beliefs play a central role in the spread of misinformation and in shaping distrust toward institutions, making them a critical testbed for evaluating the social fidelity of LLMs. LLMs are increasingly used as proxies for studying human behavior, yet little is known about whether they reproduce higher-order psychological constructs such as a conspiratorial mindset. To bridge this research gap, we administer validated psychometric surveys measuring conspiracy mindset to multiple models under different prompting and conditioning strategies. Our findings reveal that LLMs show partial agreement with elements of conspiracy belief, and conditioning with socio-demographic attributes produces uneven effects, exposing latent demographic biases. Moreover, targeted prompts can easily shift model responses toward conspiratorial directions, underscoring both the susceptibility of LLMs to manipulation and the potential risks of their deployment in sensitive contexts. These results highlight the importance of critically evaluating the psychological dimensions embedded in LLMs, both to advance computational social science and to inform possible mitigation strategies against harmful uses.

Related papers

• ConspirED: A Dataset for Cognitive Traits of Conspiracy Theories and Large Language Model Safety [87.90209836101353]
  ConspirED is the first dataset of conspiratorial content annotated for general cognitive traits.<n>We develop computational models that identify conspiratorial traits and determine dominant traits in text excerpts.<n>We evaluate large language/reasoning model (LLM/LRM) robustness to conspiratorial inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-28T06:39:25Z)
• Beyond Prompt-Induced Lies: Investigating LLM Deception on Benign Prompts [79.1081247754018]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are widely deployed in reasoning, planning, and decision-making tasks.<n>We propose a framework based on Contact Searching Questions(CSQ) to quantify the likelihood of deception.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-08T14:46:35Z)
• Passing the Turing Test in Political Discourse: Fine-Tuning LLMs to Mimic Polarized Social Media Comments [0.0]
  This study explores the extent to which fine-tuned large language models (LLMs) can replicate and amplify polarizing discourse.<n>Using a curated dataset of politically charged discussions extracted from Reddit, we fine-tune an open-source LLM to produce context-aware and ideologically aligned responses.<n>The results indicate that, when trained on partisan data, LLMs are capable of producing highly plausible and provocative comments, often indistinguishable from those written by humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-17T15:41:26Z)
• Mind the (Belief) Gap: Group Identity in the World of LLMs [36.39917781782518]
  Social biases and belief-driven behaviors can significantly impact Large Language Models (LLMs) decisions on several tasks.<n>We present a multi-agent framework that simulates belief congruence, a classical group psychology theory that plays a crucial role in shaping societal interactions and preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-03T19:50:52Z)
• Are We There Yet? Revealing the Risks of Utilizing Large Language Models in Scholarly Peer Review [66.73247554182376]
  Large language models (LLMs) have led to their integration into peer review.<n>The unchecked adoption of LLMs poses significant risks to the integrity of the peer review system.<n>We show that manipulating 5% of the reviews could potentially cause 12% of the papers to lose their position in the top 30% rankings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-02T16:55:03Z)
• Persuasion with Large Language Models: a Survey [49.86930318312291]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have created new disruptive possibilities for persuasive communication. In areas such as politics, marketing, public health, e-commerce, and charitable giving, such LLM Systems have already achieved human-level or even super-human persuasiveness. Our survey suggests that the current and future potential of LLM-based persuasion poses profound ethical and societal risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-11T10:05:52Z)
• ConspEmoLLM: Conspiracy Theory Detection Using an Emotion-Based Large Language Model [24.650234558124442]
  We propose ConspEmoLLM, the first open-source LLM that integrates affective information and is able to perform diverse tasks relating to conspiracy theories. ConspEmoLLM is fine-tuned based on an emotion-oriented LLM using our novel ConDID dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-11T14:35:45Z)
• How Susceptible are Large Language Models to Ideological Manipulation? [14.598848573524549]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) possess the potential to exert substantial influence on public perceptions and interactions with information. This raises concerns about the societal impact that could arise if the ideologies within these models can be easily manipulated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-18T22:36:19Z)
• Avalon's Game of Thoughts: Battle Against Deception through Recursive Contemplation [80.126717170151]
  This study utilizes the intricate Avalon game as a testbed to explore LLMs' potential in deceptive environments. We introduce a novel framework, Recursive Contemplation (ReCon), to enhance LLMs' ability to identify and counteract deceptive information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T16:27:36Z)
• Emotionally Numb or Empathetic? Evaluating How LLMs Feel Using EmotionBench [83.41621219298489]
  We evaluate Large Language Models' (LLMs) anthropomorphic capabilities using the emotion appraisal theory from psychology. We collect a dataset containing over 400 situations that have proven effective in eliciting the eight emotions central to our study. We conduct a human evaluation involving more than 1,200 subjects worldwide.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-07T15:18:30Z)
• Deception Abilities Emerged in Large Language Models [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) are currently at the forefront of intertwining artificial intelligence (AI) systems with human communication and everyday life. This study reveals that such strategies emerged in state-of-the-art LLMs, such as GPT-4, but were non-existent in earlier LLMs. We conduct a series of experiments showing that state-of-the-art LLMs are able to understand and induce false beliefs in other agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-31T09:27:01Z)
• Influence of External Information on Large Language Models Mirrors Social Cognitive Patterns [51.622612759892775]
  Social cognitive theory explains how people learn and acquire knowledge through observing others. Recent years have witnessed the rapid development of large language models (LLMs) LLMs, as AI agents, can observe external information, which shapes their cognition and behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-08T16:10:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.