ORCHID: Orchestrated Retrieval-Augmented Classification with Human-in-the-Loop Intelligent Decision-Making for High-Risk Property

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.04956v1
• Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2025 03:48:05 GMT
• Title: ORCHID: Orchestrated Retrieval-Augmented Classification with Human-in-the-Loop Intelligent Decision-Making for High-Risk Property
• Abstract summary: ORCHID is a modular agentic system for HRP classification.<n>It pairs retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) with human oversight to produce policy-based outputs that can be audited.<n>The demonstration shows single item submission, grounded citations, SME feedback capture, and exportable audit artifacts.
• Score: 6.643427585499247
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: High-Risk Property (HRP) classification is critical at U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) sites, where inventories include sensitive and often dual-use equipment. Compliance must track evolving rules designated by various export control policies to make transparent and auditable decisions. Traditional expert-only workflows are time-consuming, backlog-prone, and struggle to keep pace with shifting regulatory boundaries. We demo ORCHID, a modular agentic system for HRP classification that pairs retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) with human oversight to produce policy-based outputs that can be audited. Small cooperating agents, retrieval, description refiner, classifier, validator, and feedback logger, coordinate via agent-to-agent messaging and invoke tools through the Model Context Protocol (MCP) for model-agnostic on-premise operation. The interface follows an Item to Evidence to Decision loop with step-by-step reasoning, on-policy citations, and append-only audit bundles (run-cards, prompts, evidence). In preliminary tests on real HRP cases, ORCHID improves accuracy and traceability over a non-agentic baseline while deferring uncertain items to Subject Matter Experts (SMEs). The demonstration shows single item submission, grounded citations, SME feedback capture, and exportable audit artifacts, illustrating a practical path to trustworthy LLM assistance in sensitive DOE compliance workflows.

Related papers

• Evidence-in-the-Loop: Trace-Driven Optimization for Customer-Service LLM Agents [6.9430026014199635]
  BM25 recall, issue-title-vector recall, issue-description-vector recall, weighted RRF fusion, and cross-encoder reranking construct grounded evidence for controlled LLM decisions.<n>Policy-guided orchestration then combines this RAG evidence with scenario-specific rule evidence, conversation memory, and forgetting state inside a fixed LangGraph DAGcitelanggraph2024.<n>The paper contributes three reusable deployment patterns: textbfhybrid RAG evidence construction, textbfevidence-grounded issue/action decision, and textbftrace-driven RAG and
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-20T15:07:58Z)
• TAPO: Tool-Aware Policy Optimization via Credit Transfer for Multimodal Search Agents [54.08846865906602]
  We characterize credit misassignment as a systematic failure mode of GRPO in tool-augmented multimodal search agents.<n>We propose Tool-Aware Policy Optimization (TAPO), which exploits the parameter-determinism property of information-acquisition tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-04T07:15:43Z)
• What to Test Next: Interpretable Coverage Gap Discovery in Driving VLMs [52.50210189669399]
  Driving vision-language models (VLMs) must accurately understand scenes across diverse conditions defined by Operational Design Domains (ODDs)<n>We propose SliceScorer, a deterministic scoring rule for missing-slice recommendation.<n>We show that SliceNav surfaces high-risk coverage gaps more effectively than prior slice-discovery methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-01T03:18:01Z)
• Time to REFLECT: Can We Trust LLM Judges for Evidence-based Research Agents? [61.49434544687523]
  We introduce REFLECT, a meta-evaluation benchmark targeting fine-grained failure detection in agentic environments.<n> REFLECT defines a detailed taxonomy of process- and outcome-level failure modes, instantiated by performing controlled and localized interventions.<n>Our experiments show that even the best-performing models achieve overall accuracies below 55% across reasoning, tool-use, and report-quality failures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-18T23:55:08Z)
• Interactive Critique-Revision Training for Reliable Structured LLM Generation [18.00222080273147]
  We propose DPA-GRPO, a paired-action training method for a two-player generator--verifier game with structured verifier interventions.<n>We analyze the unregularized game and show that positive probability on strictly lower-reward intervention or revision actions creates a profitable unilateral deviation.<n>Experiments on TaxCalc TY24 show that DPA-GRPO improves structured decision accuracy over zero-shot generation and generator-only RL baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-08T17:00:38Z)
• Making AI-Assisted Grant Evaluation Auditable without Exposing the Model [0.0]
  We propose a TEE-based architecture that helps reconcile requirements through remote attestation.<n>The architecture allows an external verifier to check which model, rubric, prompt template, and input representation were used.<n>We position the design relative to confidential AI inference, attestable AI audits, zero-knowledge machine learning, algorithmic accountability, and AI-assisted peer review.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-28T04:10:04Z)
• AJ-Bench: Benchmarking Agent-as-a-Judge for Environment-Aware Evaluation [71.49152943451328]
  We introduce a benchmark AJ-Bench to evaluate Agent-as-a-Judge across three domains-search, data systems, and graphical user interfaces-comprising 155 tasks and 516 annotated trajectories.<n>Experiments demonstrate consistent performance gains over LLM-as-a-Judge baselines, while also revealing substantial open challenges in agent-based verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-20T13:23:38Z)
• IMMACULATE: A Practical LLM Auditing Framework via Verifiable Computation [49.796717294455796]
  We present IMMACULATE, a practical auditing framework that detects economically motivated deviations.<n>IMMACULATE selectively audits a small fraction of requests using verifiable computation, achieving strong detection guarantees while amortizing cryptographic overhead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-26T07:21:02Z)
• From Transcripts to AI Agents: Knowledge Extraction, RAG Integration, and Robust Evaluation of Conversational AI Assistants [0.0]
  Building reliable conversational AI assistants for customer-facing industries remains challenging due to noisy conversational data, fragmented knowledge, and the requirement for accurate human hand-off.<n>This paper presents an end-to-end framework for constructing and evaluating a conversational AI assistant directly from historical call transcripts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-26T07:44:47Z)
• Preventing the Collapse of Peer Review Requires Verification-First AI [49.995126139461085]
  We propose truth-coupling, i.e. how tightly venue scores track latent scientific truth.<n>We formalize two forces that drive a phase transition toward proxy-sovereign evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-23T17:17:32Z)
• Gaming the Judge: Unfaithful Chain-of-Thought Can Undermine Agent Evaluation [76.5533899503582]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as judges to evaluate agent performance.<n>We show this paradigm implicitly assumes that the agent's chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning faithfully reflects both its internal reasoning and the underlying environment state.<n>We demonstrate that manipulated reasoning alone can inflate false positive rates of state-of-the-art VLM judges by up to 90% across 800 trajectories spanning diverse web tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-21T06:07:43Z)
• Are LLMs Vulnerable to Preference-Undermining Attacks (PUA)? A Factorial Analysis Methodology for Diagnosing the Trade-off between Preference Alignment and Real-World Validity [45.92643973404507]
  We investigate whether aligned models are vulnerable to Preference-Undermining Attacks (PUA), a class of manipulative prompting strategies.<n>Surprisingly, more advanced models are sometimes more susceptible to manipulative prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-10T15:16:23Z)
• Interact-RAG: Reason and Interact with the Corpus, Beyond Black-Box Retrieval [49.85856484781787]
  We introduce Interact-RAG, a new paradigm that elevates the LLM agent into an active manipulator of the retrieval process.<n>We develop a reasoning-enhanced workflow, which enables both zero-shot execution and the synthesis of interaction trajectories.<n>Experiments across six benchmarks demonstrate that Interact-RAG significantly outperforms other advanced methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-31T15:48:43Z)
• "Show Me You Comply... Without Showing Me Anything": Zero-Knowledge Software Auditing for AI-Enabled Systems [2.2981698355892686]
  This paper introduces ZKMLOps, a novel MLOps verification framework.<n>It operationalizes Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs)-cryptographic protocols allowing a prover to convince a verifier that a statement is true.<n>We evaluate the framework's practicality through a study of regulatory compliance in financial risk auditing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-30T15:03:32Z)
• Analyzing and Internalizing Complex Policy Documents for LLM Agents [53.14898416858099]
  Large Language Model (LLM)-based agentic systems rely on in-context policy documents encoding diverse business rules.<n>This motivates developing internalization methods that embed policy documents into model priors while preserving performance.<n>We introduce CC-Gen, an agentic benchmark generator with Controllable Complexity across four levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T16:30:07Z)
• Automatic Building Code Review: A Case Study [6.530899637501737]
  Building officials face labor-intensive, error-prone, and costly manual reviews of design documents as projects increase in size and complexity.<n>This study introduces a novel agent-driven framework that integrates BIM-based data extraction with automated verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-03T00:30:14Z)
• CORTEX: Collaborative LLM Agents for High-Stakes Alert Triage [10.088447487211893]
  Security Operations Centers (SOCs) are overwhelmed by tens of thousands of daily alerts.<n>This overload creates alert fatigue, leading to overlooked threats and analyst burnout.<n>We propose CORTEX, a multi-agent LLM architecture for high-stakes alert triage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-30T22:09:31Z)
• Hallucination-Resistant, Domain-Specific Research Assistant with Self-Evaluation and Vector-Grounded Retrieval [0.0]
  RA-FSM is a GPT-based research assistant that wraps generation in a finite-state control loop: Relevance -> Confidence -> Knowledge.<n>The controller filters out-of-scope queries, scores answerability, decomposes questions, and triggers retrieval only when needed.<n>We implement the system for photonics and evaluate it on six task categories: analytical reasoning, numerical analysis, methodological critique, comparative synthesis, factual extraction, and application design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-25T21:35:46Z)
• CompassVerifier: A Unified and Robust Verifier for LLMs Evaluation and Outcome Reward [50.97588334916863]
  We develop CompassVerifier, an accurate and robust lightweight verifier model for evaluation and outcome reward.<n>It demonstrates multi-domain competency spanning math, knowledge, and diverse reasoning tasks, with the capability to process various answer types.<n>We introduce VerifierBench benchmark comprising model outputs collected from multiple data sources, augmented through manual analysis of metaerror patterns to enhance CompassVerifier.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-05T17:55:24Z)
• MA-RAG: Multi-Agent Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Collaborative Chain-of-Thought Reasoning [36.3918410061572]
  MA-RAG addresses the inherent ambiguities and reasoning challenges in complex information-seeking tasks.<n>Unlike conventional RAG methods that rely on end-to-end fine-tuning or isolated component enhancements, MA-RAG orchestrates a collaborative set of specialized AI agents.<n>Our results highlight the effectiveness of collaborative, modular reasoning in retrieval-augmented systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T15:05:18Z)
• CoTGuard: Using Chain-of-Thought Triggering for Copyright Protection in Multi-Agent LLM Systems [55.57181090183713]
  We introduce CoTGuard, a novel framework for copyright protection that leverages trigger-based detection within Chain-of-Thought reasoning.<n>Specifically, we can activate specific CoT segments and monitor intermediate reasoning steps for unauthorized content reproduction by embedding specific trigger queries into agent prompts.<n>This approach enables fine-grained, interpretable detection of copyright violations in collaborative agent scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T01:42:37Z)
• Retrieval is Not Enough: Enhancing RAG Reasoning through Test-Time Critique and Optimization [58.390885294401066]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has become a widely adopted paradigm for enabling knowledge-grounded large language models (LLMs)<n>RAG pipelines often fail to ensure that model reasoning remains consistent with the evidence retrieved, leading to factual inconsistencies or unsupported conclusions.<n>We propose AlignRAG, a novel iterative framework grounded in Critique-Driven Alignment (CDA)<n>We introduce AlignRAG-auto, an autonomous variant that dynamically terminates refinement, removing the need to pre-specify the number of critique iterations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T04:56:47Z)
• Are You Getting What You Pay For? Auditing Model Substitution in LLM APIs [71.7892165868749]
  Commercial Large Language Model (LLM) APIs create a fundamental trust problem.<n>Users pay for specific models but have no guarantee that providers deliver them faithfully.<n>We formalize this model substitution problem and evaluate detection methods under realistic adversarial conditions.<n>We propose and evaluate the use of Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) as one practical and robust solution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T03:57:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.