An Epistemic Perspective on Agent Awareness
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.05977v1
- Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2025 11:50:25 GMT
- Title: An Epistemic Perspective on Agent Awareness
- Authors: Pavel Naumov, Alexandra Pavlova,
- Abstract summary: The paper proposes to treat agent awareness as a form of knowledge, breaking the tradition in the existing literature on awareness.<n>The work introduces two modalities capturing these forms and formally specifies their meaning using a version of 2D-semantics.
- Score: 61.364879462585186
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: The paper proposes to treat agent awareness as a form of knowledge, breaking the tradition in the existing literature on awareness. It distinguishes the de re and de dicto forms of such knowledge. The work introduces two modalities capturing these forms and formally specifies their meaning using a version of 2D-semantics. The main technical result is a sound and complete logical system describing the interplay between the two proposed modalities and the standard "knowledge of the fact" modality.
Related papers
- The Belief-Desire-Intention Ontology for modelling mental reality and agency [0.15115553092933548]
The Belief-Desire-Intention (BDI) model is a cornerstone for representing rational agency in artificial intelligence and cognitive sciences.<n>This paper presents a formal BDI Ontology that captures the cognitive architecture of agents through beliefs, desires, intentions, and their dynamic interrelations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-21T11:30:17Z) - A Theory-driven Interpretation and Elaboration of Verification and Validation [49.97673761305336]
This paper presents a formal theory of verification and validation (V&V) within systems engineering.<n>We develop precise definitions of verification and validation, articulating their roles in confirming and contextualizing knowledge about systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-11T17:58:07Z) - Aligning Characteristic Descriptors with Images for Human-Expert-like Explainability [0.0]
In mission-critical domains such as law enforcement and medical diagnosis, the ability to explain and interpret the outputs of deep learning models is crucial.
We propose a novel approach that utilizes characteristic descriptors to explain model decisions by identifying their presence in images.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-06T15:47:18Z) - On the Role of Entity and Event Level Conceptualization in Generalizable Reasoning: A Survey of Tasks, Methods, Applications, and Future Directions [62.06913340614293]
This paper proposes a categorization of different types of conceptualizations into four levels based on the types of instances being conceptualized.<n>We present the first comprehensive survey of over 150 papers, surveying various definitions, resources, methods, and downstream applications related to conceptualization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-16T10:32:41Z) - A Semantic Approach to Decidability in Epistemic Planning (Extended
Version) [72.77805489645604]
We use a novel semantic approach to achieve decidability.
Specifically, we augment the logic of knowledge S5$_n$ and with an interaction axiom called (knowledge) commutativity.
We prove that our framework admits a finitary non-fixpoint characterization of common knowledge, which is of independent interest.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-28T11:26:26Z) - Position Matters! Empirical Study of Order Effect in Knowledge-grounded
Dialogue [54.98184262897166]
We investigate how the order of the knowledge set can influence autoregressive dialogue systems' responses.
We propose a simple and novel technique to alleviate the order effect by modifying the position embeddings of knowledge input.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-12T10:13:00Z) - CO-NNECT: A Framework for Revealing Commonsense Knowledge Paths as
Explicitations of Implicit Knowledge in Texts [12.94206336329289]
We leverage commonsense knowledge in form of knowledge paths to establish connections between sentences.
These connections can be direct (singlehop paths) or require intermediate concepts (multihop paths)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-07T10:43:43Z) - Reasons, Values, Stakeholders: A Philosophical Framework for Explainable
Artificial Intelligence [0.0]
This paper offers a multi-faceted framework that brings more conceptual precision to the present debate.
It identifies the types of explanations that are most pertinent to artificial intelligence predictions.
It also recognizes the relevance and importance of social and ethical values for the evaluation of these explanations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-01T04:50:31Z) - Comprehension and Knowledge [15.076964620370266]
The ability of an agent to comprehend a sentence is tightly connected to the agent's prior experiences and background knowledge.
The paper proposes a complete bimodal logical system that describes an interplay between comprehension and knowledge modalities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-11T18:42:08Z) - Neuro-symbolic Architectures for Context Understanding [59.899606495602406]
We propose the use of hybrid AI methodology as a framework for combining the strengths of data-driven and knowledge-driven approaches.
Specifically, we inherit the concept of neuro-symbolism as a way of using knowledge-bases to guide the learning progress of deep neural networks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-03-09T15:04:07Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.