Sparse Linear Regression is Easy on Random Supports

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.06211v1
• Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2025 03:48:21 GMT
• Title: Sparse Linear Regression is Easy on Random Supports
• Authors: Gautam Chandrasekaran, Raghu Meka, Konstantinos Stavropoulos,
• Abstract summary: We are given as input a design matrix $X in mathbbRN times d$ and measurements or labels $y in mathbbRN$.<n>We find that if the support of $w*$ is chosen at random, we can get prediction error $epsilon$ with roughly $N = O(klog d/epsilon)$ samples.
• Score: 20.128442161507582
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Sparse linear regression is one of the most basic questions in machine learning and statistics. Here, we are given as input a design matrix $X \in \mathbb{R}^{N \times d}$ and measurements or labels ${y} \in \mathbb{R}^N$ where ${y} = {X} {w}^* + {\xi}$, and ${\xi}$ is the noise in the measurements. Importantly, we have the additional constraint that the unknown signal vector ${w}^*$ is sparse: it has $k$ non-zero entries where $k$ is much smaller than the ambient dimension. Our goal is to output a prediction vector $\widehat{{w}}$ that has small prediction error: $\frac{1}{N}\cdot \|{X} {w}^* - {X} \widehat{{w}}\|^2_2$. Information-theoretically, we know what is best possible in terms of measurements: under most natural noise distributions, we can get prediction error at most $\epsilon$ with roughly $N = O(k \log d/\epsilon)$ samples. Computationally, this currently needs $d^{\Omega(k)}$ run-time. Alternately, with $N = O(d)$, we can get polynomial-time. Thus, there is an exponential gap (in the dependence on $d$) between the two and we do not know if it is possible to get $d^{o(k)}$ run-time and $o(d)$ samples. We give the first generic positive result for worst-case design matrices ${X}$: For any ${X}$, we show that if the support of ${w}^*$ is chosen at random, we can get prediction error $\epsilon$ with $N = \text{poly}(k, \log d, 1/\epsilon)$ samples and run-time $\text{poly}(d,N)$. This run-time holds for any design matrix ${X}$ with condition number up to $2^{\text{poly}(d)}$. Previously, such results were known for worst-case ${w}^*$, but only for random design matrices from well-behaved families, matrices that have a very low condition number ($\text{poly}(\log d)$; e.g., as studied in compressed sensing), or those with special structural properties.

Related papers

• Information-Computation Tradeoffs for Noiseless Linear Regression with Oblivious Contamination [65.37519531362157]
  We show that any efficient Statistical Query algorithm for this task requires VSTAT complexity at least $tildeOmega(d1/2/alpha2)$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-12T15:42:44Z)
• Lasso and Partially-Rotated Designs [2.28438857884398]
  We introduce a new $textitsemirandom$ family of designs for which the RE constant with respect to the secret is bounded away from zero.<n>Our results imply that Lasso achieves prediction error $O(k log d / lambda_min n)$ with high probability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-16T10:25:08Z)
• The Communication Complexity of Approximating Matrix Rank [50.6867896228563]
  We show that this problem has randomized communication complexity $Omega(frac1kcdot n2log|mathbbF|)$. As an application, we obtain an $Omega(frac1kcdot n2log|mathbbF|)$ space lower bound for any streaming algorithm with $k$ passes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-26T06:21:42Z)
• Optimal Sketching for Residual Error Estimation for Matrix and Vector Norms [50.15964512954274]
  We study the problem of residual error estimation for matrix and vector norms using a linear sketch. We demonstrate that this gives a substantial advantage empirically, for roughly the same sketch size and accuracy as in previous work. We also show an $Omega(k2/pn1-2/p)$ lower bound for the sparse recovery problem, which is tight up to a $mathrmpoly(log n)$ factor.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-16T02:33:07Z)
• Sample-Efficient Linear Regression with Self-Selection Bias [7.605563562103568]
  We consider the problem of linear regression with self-selection bias in the unknown-index setting. We provide a novel and near optimally sample-efficient (in terms of $k$) algorithm to recover $mathbfw_1,ldots,mathbfw_kin. Our algorithm succeeds under significantly relaxed noise assumptions, and therefore also succeeds in the related setting of max-linear regression.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-22T02:20:24Z)
• Distribution-Independent Regression for Generalized Linear Models with Oblivious Corruptions [49.69852011882769]
  We show the first algorithms for the problem of regression for generalized linear models (GLMs) in the presence of additive oblivious noise. We present an algorithm that tackles newthis problem in its most general distribution-independent setting. This is the first newalgorithmic result for GLM regression newwith oblivious noise which can handle more than half the samples being arbitrarily corrupted.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-20T21:41:59Z)
• A Nearly-Optimal Bound for Fast Regression with $\ell_\infty$ Guarantee [16.409210914237086]
  Given a matrix $Ain mathbbRntimes d$ and a tensor $bin mathbbRn$, we consider the regression problem with $ell_infty$ guarantees. We show that in order to obtain such $ell_infty$ guarantee for $ell$ regression, one has to use sketching matrices that are dense. We also develop a novel analytical framework for $ell_infty$ guarantee regression that utilizes the Oblivious Coordinate-wise Embedding (OCE) property
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-01T05:22:40Z)
• A spectral least-squares-type method for heavy-tailed corrupted regression with unknown covariance \& heterogeneous noise [2.019622939313173]
  We revisit heavy-tailed corrupted least-squares linear regression assuming to have a corrupted $n$-sized label-feature sample of at most $epsilon n$ arbitrary outliers. We propose a near-optimal computationally tractable estimator, based on the power method, assuming no knowledge on $(Sigma,Xi) nor the operator norm of $Xi$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-06T23:37:31Z)
• Active Sampling for Linear Regression Beyond the $\ell_2$ Norm [70.49273459706546]
  We study active sampling algorithms for linear regression, which aim to query only a small number of entries of a target vector. We show that this dependence on $d$ is optimal, up to logarithmic factors. We also provide the first total sensitivity upper bound $O(dmax1,p/2log2 n)$ for loss functions with at most degree $p$ growth.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-09T00:20:01Z)
• Sparse sketches with small inversion bias [79.77110958547695]
  Inversion bias arises when averaging estimates of quantities that depend on the inverse covariance. We develop a framework for analyzing inversion bias, based on our proposed concept of an $(epsilon,delta)$-unbiased estimator for random matrices. We show that when the sketching matrix $S$ is dense and has i.i.d. sub-gaussian entries, the estimator $(epsilon,delta)$-unbiased for $(Atop A)-1$ with a sketch of size $m=O(d+sqrt d/
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-21T01:33:15Z)
• Efficient Statistics for Sparse Graphical Models from Truncated Samples [19.205541380535397]
  We focus on two fundamental and classical problems: (i) inference of sparse Gaussian graphical models and (ii) support recovery of sparse linear models. For sparse linear regression, suppose samples $(bf x,y)$ are generated where $y = bf xtopOmega* + mathcalN(0,1)$ and $(bf x, y)$ is seen only if $y$ belongs to a truncation set $S subseteq mathbbRd$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-17T09:21:00Z)
• The Average-Case Time Complexity of Certifying the Restricted Isometry Property [66.65353643599899]
  In compressed sensing, the restricted isometry property (RIP) on $M times N$ sensing matrices guarantees efficient reconstruction of sparse vectors. We investigate the exact average-case time complexity of certifying the RIP property for $Mtimes N$ matrices with i.i.d. $mathcalN(0,1/M)$ entries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-22T16:55:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.