LLM For Loop Invariant Generation and Fixing: How Far Are We?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.06552v1
• Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2025 21:47:45 GMT
• Title: LLM For Loop Invariant Generation and Fixing: How Far Are We?
• Abstract summary: The identification of loop invariants is a critical step to support automated program safety assessment.<n>Recent advancements in Large Language Models have demonstrated potential in diverse software engineering (SE) and formal verification tasks.<n>We report an empirical study of both open-source and closed-source LLMs of varying sizes to assess their proficiency in inferring inductive loop invariants for programs and in fixing incorrect invariants.
• Score: 9.510531513586322
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: A loop invariant is a property of a loop that remains true before and after each execution of the loop. The identification of loop invariants is a critical step to support automated program safety assessment. Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated potential in diverse software engineering (SE) and formal verification tasks. However, we are not aware of the performance of LLMs to infer loop invariants. We report an empirical study of both open-source and closed-source LLMs of varying sizes to assess their proficiency in inferring inductive loop invariants for programs and in fixing incorrect invariants. Our findings reveal that while LLMs exhibit some utility in inferring and repairing loop invariants, their performance is substantially enhanced when supplemented with auxiliary information such as domain knowledge and illustrative examples. LLMs achieve a maximum success rate of 78\% in generating, but are limited to 16\% in repairing the invariant.

Related papers

• Talk is Cheap, Logic is Hard: Benchmarking LLMs on Post-Condition Formalization [0.32665457005470505]
  This paper presents a study on the ability of LLMs in generating formal FULL pre- and post-conditions of a program.<n>24 state-of-the-art LLMs were evaluated on a freshly prepared dataset of 40 tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-17T22:46:42Z)
• Task-Awareness Improves LLM Generations and Uncertainty [48.857040212979484]
  Bayes-optimal responses consistently outperform standard decoding methods like beam search.<n>Our decision-theoretic framework is applicable to any problem that admits a latent response structure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T10:16:23Z)
• Reasoning with Confidence: Efficient Verification of LLM Reasoning Steps via Uncertainty Heads [104.9566359759396]
  We propose a lightweight alternative for step-level reasoning verification based on data-driven uncertainty scores.<n>Our findings suggest that the internal states of LLMs encode their uncertainty and can serve as reliable signals for reasoning verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-09T03:38:29Z)
• LLM-Specific Utility: A New Perspective for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [110.610512800947]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) enhances large language models (LLMs) by incorporating external knowledge.<n>Existing studies often treat utility as a generic attribute, ignoring the fact that different LLMs may benefit differently from the same passage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T12:57:45Z)
• InvBench: Can LLMs Accelerate Program Verification with Invariant Synthesis? [13.240989975977302]
  We introduce a principled framework for evaluating LLMs on invariant synthesis.<n>Our approach uses a verifier-based decision procedure with a formal soundness guarantee.<n>We evaluate 7 state-of-the-art LLMs, and existing LLM-based verifiers against the traditional solver UAutomizer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-25T21:47:02Z)
• Do AI models help produce verified bug fixes? [62.985237003585674]
  Large Language Models are used to produce corrections to software bugs.<n>This paper investigates how programmers use Large Language Models to complement their own skills.<n>The results are a first step towards a proper role for AI and LLMs in providing guaranteed-correct fixes to program bugs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-21T17:30:16Z)
• Rethinking Invariance in In-context Learning [31.27174483063626]
  In-Context Learning (ICL) has emerged as a pivotal capability of auto-regressive large language models.<n>It is hindered by a notable sensitivity to the ordering of context examples regardless of their mutual independence.<n>In this work, we identify two crucial elements in the design of an invariant ICL algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-08T06:59:14Z)
• Efficient Real-time Refinement of Language Model Text Generation [65.1937138219008]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performance across a wide range of natural language tasks.<n>A critical challenge remains in that they sometimes generate factually incorrect answers.<n>We propose Streaming-VR, a novel approach designed to enhance the efficiency of verification and refinement of LLM outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-14T03:59:48Z)
• Provenance: A Light-weight Fact-checker for Retrieval Augmented LLM Generation Output [49.893971654861424]
  We present a light-weight approach for detecting nonfactual outputs from retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) We compute a factuality score that can be thresholded to yield a binary decision. Our experiments show high area under the ROC curve (AUC) across a wide range of relevant open source datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-01T20:44:59Z)
• RAC: Efficient LLM Factuality Correction with Retrieval Augmentation [8.207682890286957]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit impressive results across a wide range of natural language processing (NLP) tasks, yet they can often produce factually incorrect outputs. This paper introduces a simple but effective low-latency post-correction method, textbfRetrieval Augmented Correction (RAC), aimed at enhancing the factual performance of LLMs without requiring additional fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T06:11:38Z)
• Finding Inductive Loop Invariants using Large Language Models [14.846222005558666]
  Finding inductive loop invariants is an undecidable problem. Despite a long history of research towards practical solutions, it remains far from a solved problem. This paper investigates the capabilities of the Large Language Models in offering a new solution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T06:58:09Z)
• Ranking LLM-Generated Loop Invariants for Program Verification [14.7590099354867]
  Large Language Models are capable of synthesizing loop invariants for a class of programs in a 0-shot setting. This can lead to a large number of calls to a program verifier to establish an invariant. We have designed a ranker that can distinguish between correct inductive invariants and incorrect attempts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-13T18:13:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.