MVU-Eval: Towards Multi-Video Understanding Evaluation for Multimodal LLMs
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.07250v2
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 01:41:46 GMT
- Title: MVU-Eval: Towards Multi-Video Understanding Evaluation for Multimodal LLMs
- Authors: Tianhao Peng, Haochen Wang, Yuanxing Zhang, Zekun Wang, Zili Wang, Gavin Chang, Jian Yang, Shihao Li, Yanghai Wang, Xintao Wang, Houyi Li, Wei Ji, Pengfei Wan, Steven Huang, Zhaoxiang Zhang, Jiaheng Liu,
- Abstract summary: MVU-Eval is the first comprehensive benchmark for evaluating Multi-Video Understanding for MLLMs.<n>Our MVU-Eval mainly assesses eight core competencies through 1,824 meticulously curated question-answer pairs spanning 4,959 videos.<n>These capabilities are rigorously aligned with real-world applications such as multi-sensor synthesis in autonomous systems and cross-angle sports analytics.
- Score: 61.70050081221131
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: The advent of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) has expanded AI capabilities to visual modalities, yet existing evaluation benchmarks remain limited to single-video understanding, overlooking the critical need for multi-video understanding in real-world scenarios (e.g., sports analytics and autonomous driving). To address this significant gap, we introduce MVU-Eval, the first comprehensive benchmark for evaluating Multi-Video Understanding for MLLMs. Specifically, our MVU-Eval mainly assesses eight core competencies through 1,824 meticulously curated question-answer pairs spanning 4,959 videos from diverse domains, addressing both fundamental perception tasks and high-order reasoning tasks. These capabilities are rigorously aligned with real-world applications such as multi-sensor synthesis in autonomous systems and cross-angle sports analytics. Through extensive evaluation of state-of-the-art open-source and closed-source models, we reveal significant performance discrepancies and limitations in current MLLMs' ability to perform understanding across multiple videos. The benchmark will be made publicly available to foster future research.
Related papers
- MT-Video-Bench: A Holistic Video Understanding Benchmark for Evaluating Multimodal LLMs in Multi-Turn Dialogues [38.63457491325088]
We introduce MT-Video-Bench, a holistic video understanding benchmark for evaluating MLLMs in multi-turn dialogues.<n>Specifically, our MT-Video-Bench mainly assesses six core competencies that focus on perceptivity and interactivity, encompassing 987 meticulously curated multi-turn dialogues.<n>These capabilities are rigorously aligned with real-world applications, such as interactive sports analysis and multi-turn video-based intelligent tutoring.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-20T16:38:40Z) - SciVideoBench: Benchmarking Scientific Video Reasoning in Large Multimodal Models [89.10286051587151]
We introduce SciVideoBench, a rigorous benchmark designed to assess advanced video reasoning in scientific contexts.<n>SciVideoBench consists of 1,000 carefully crafted multiple-choice questions derived from cutting-edge scientific experimental videos.<n>Our evaluation highlights significant performance deficits in state-of-the-art proprietary and open-source LMMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-09T17:59:23Z) - HumanVideo-MME: Benchmarking MLLMs for Human-Centric Video Understanding [120.84817886550765]
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated significant advances in visual understanding tasks involving both images and videos.<n>Existing human-centric benchmarks predominantly emphasize video generation quality and action recognition, while overlooking essential perceptual and cognitive abilities required in human-centered scenarios.<n>We propose a rigorously curated benchmark designed to provide a more holistic evaluation of MLLMs in human-centric video understanding.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-07T11:52:24Z) - MOMENTS: A Comprehensive Multimodal Benchmark for Theory of Mind [41.188841829937466]
MoMentS (Multimodal Mental States) is a benchmark for building socially intelligent multimodal agents.<n>MoMentS includes over 2,300 multiple-choice questions spanning seven distinct ToM categories.<n>We evaluate several MLLMs and find that although vision generally improves performance, models still struggle to integrate it effectively.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-06T15:06:30Z) - Perception-R1: Advancing Multimodal Reasoning Capabilities of MLLMs via Visual Perception Reward [77.34936657745578]
We propose Perception-R1, which introduces a novel visual perception reward that explicitly encourages MLLMs to perceive the visual content accurately.<n>We show that Perception-R1 achieves state-of-the-art performance on most benchmarks using only 1,442 training data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-08T16:48:42Z) - Seeing from Another Perspective: Evaluating Multi-View Understanding in MLLMs [41.072699990427374]
Multi-view understanding is a fundamental challenge in Multi-Modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to be used as embodied agents.<n>We propose All-Angles Bench, a benchmark of over 2,100 human carefully annotated multi-view question-answer pairs across 90 real-world scenes.<n>Our experiments, benchmark on 27 representative MLLMs including Gemini-2.0-Flash, Claude-3.7-Sonnet, and GPT-4o against human evaluators reveals a substantial performance gap.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-21T17:59:53Z) - Video-MMLU: A Massive Multi-Discipline Lecture Understanding Benchmark [27.487587901232057]
We evaluate over 90 open-source and proprietary models, ranging from 0.5B to 40B parameters.<n>Our results highlight the limitations of current models in addressing the cognitive challenges presented by these lectures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-20T17:58:46Z) - MMIE: Massive Multimodal Interleaved Comprehension Benchmark for Large Vision-Language Models [71.36392373876505]
We introduce MMIE, a large-scale benchmark for evaluating interleaved multimodal comprehension and generation in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs)<n>MMIE comprises 20K meticulously curated multimodal queries, spanning 3 categories, 12 fields, and 102 subfields, including mathematics, coding, physics, literature, health, and arts.<n>It supports both interleaved inputs and outputs, offering a mix of multiple-choice and open-ended question formats to evaluate diverse competencies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-14T04:15:00Z) - MVBench: A Comprehensive Multi-modal Video Understanding Benchmark [63.14000659130736]
We introduce a comprehensive Multi-modal Video understanding Benchmark, namely MVBench.
We first introduce a novel static-to-dynamic method to define these temporal-related tasks.
Then, guided by the task definition, we automatically convert public video annotations into multiple-choice QA to evaluate each task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-28T17:59:04Z) - On the Performance of Multimodal Language Models [4.677125897916577]
This study conducts a comparative analysis of different multimodal instruction tuning approaches.
We reveal key insights for guiding architectural choices when incorporating multimodal capabilities into large language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-04T23:33:36Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.