Uncertainty Calibration of Multi-Label Bird Sound Classifiers

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.08261v1
• Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 01:49:35 GMT
• Title: Uncertainty Calibration of Multi-Label Bird Sound Classifiers
• Abstract summary: In bioacoustics, calibration is challenged by overlapping vocalisations, long-tailed species distributions, and distribution shifts between training and deployment data.<n>We benchmark the calibration of four state-of-the-art multi-label bird sound classifiers on the BirdSet benchmark, evaluating both global, per-dataset and per-class calibration.
• Score: 2.3510007132962203
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Passive acoustic monitoring enables large-scale biodiversity assessment, but reliable classification of bioacoustic sounds requires not only high accuracy but also well-calibrated uncertainty estimates to ground decision-making. In bioacoustics, calibration is challenged by overlapping vocalisations, long-tailed species distributions, and distribution shifts between training and deployment data. The calibration of multi-label deep learning classifiers within the domain of bioacoustics has not yet been assessed. We systematically benchmark the calibration of four state-of-the-art multi-label bird sound classifiers on the BirdSet benchmark, evaluating both global, per-dataset and per-class calibration using threshold-free calibration metrics (ECE, MCS) alongside discrimination metrics (cmAP). Model calibration varies significantly across datasets and classes. While Perch v2 and ConvNeXt$_{BS}$ show better global calibration, results vary between datasets. Both models indicate consistent underconfidence, while AudioProtoPNet and BirdMAE are mostly overconfident. Surprisingly, calibration seems to be better for less frequent classes. Using simple post hoc calibration methods we demonstrate a straightforward way to improve calibration. A small labelled calibration set is sufficient to significantly improve calibration with Platt scaling, while global calibration parameters suffer from dataset variability. Our findings highlight the importance of evaluating and improving uncertainty calibration in bioacoustic classifiers.

Related papers

• Reliability-Aware Ensemble Classification Under Class Imbalance: A Calibration Study on Liquid-Based Cervical Cytology [3.093890460224435]
  This paper presents a class-imbalance-aware and calibration-aware ensemble classification study on the Mendeley LBC dataset.<n>Three lightweight architectures are trained directly on Mendeley LBC using weighted random sampling to counteract class imbalance.<n>Results suggest that, for this dataset, calibration is the dominant lever for reliability, not ensemble size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-10T16:41:18Z)
• Classifier Calibration at Scale: An Empirical Study of Model-Agnostic Post-Hoc Methods [0.0]
  We study model-agnostic post-hoc calibration methods to improve probabilistic predictions in supervised binary classification.<n>We benchmark 21 widely used classifiers, including linear models, SVMs, tree ensembles (CatBoost, XGBoost, LightGBM)<n>We find that commonly used calibration procedures, most notably Platt scaling and isotonic regression, can systematically degrade proper scoring performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-19T18:23:36Z)
• CalibrateMix: Guided-Mixup Calibration of Image Semi-Supervised Models [49.588973929678765]
  CalibrateMix is a mixup-based approach that aims to improve the calibration of SSL models.<n>Our method achieves lower expected calibration error (ECE) and superior accuracy compared to existing SSL approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-17T04:43:53Z)
• Scalable Utility-Aware Multiclass Calibration [53.28176049547449]
  Utility calibration is a general framework that measures the calibration error relative to a specific utility function.<n>We demonstrate how this framework can unify and re-interpret several existing calibration metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-29T12:32:14Z)
• Beyond One-Hot Labels: Semantic Mixing for Model Calibration [22.39558434131574]
  We present textbfCalibration-aware Semantic Mixing (CSM), a novel framework that generates training samples with mixed class characteristics.<n>We show that CSM achieves superior calibration compared to the state-of-the-art calibration approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-18T08:26:18Z)
• Adaptive Calibrator Ensemble for Model Calibration under Distribution Shift [23.794897699193875]
  adaptive calibrator ensemble (ACE) calibrates OOD datasets whose difficulty is usually higher than the calibration set. ACE generally improves the performance of a few state-of-the-art calibration schemes on a series of OOD benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-09T15:22:02Z)
• On Calibrating Semantic Segmentation Models: Analyses and An Algorithm [51.85289816613351]
  We study the problem of semantic segmentation calibration. Model capacity, crop size, multi-scale testing, and prediction correctness have impact on calibration. We propose a simple, unifying, and effective approach, namely selective scaling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-22T22:05:16Z)
• Investigation of Different Calibration Methods for Deep Speaker Embedding based Verification Systems [66.61691401921296]
  This paper presents an investigation over several methods of score calibration for deep speaker embedding extractors. An additional focus of this research is to estimate the impact of score normalization on the calibration performance of the system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-28T21:22:22Z)
• Hidden Heterogeneity: When to Choose Similarity-Based Calibration [12.788224825185633]
  Black-box calibration methods are unable to detect subpopulations where calibration could improve prediction accuracy. The paper proposes a quantitative measure for hidden heterogeneity (HH) Experiments show that the improvements in calibration achieved by similarity-based calibration methods correlate with the amount of HH present and, given sufficient calibration data, generally exceed calibration achieved by global methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-03T20:43:25Z)
• Localized Calibration: Metrics and Recalibration [133.07044916594361]
  We propose a fine-grained calibration metric that spans the gap between fully global and fully individualized calibration. We then introduce a localized recalibration method, LoRe, that improves the LCE better than existing recalibration methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-22T07:22:12Z)
• Unsupervised Calibration under Covariate Shift [92.02278658443166]
  We introduce the problem of calibration under domain shift and propose an importance sampling based approach to address it. We evaluate and discuss the efficacy of our method on both real-world datasets and synthetic datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-29T21:50:07Z)
• Multi-Class Uncertainty Calibration via Mutual Information Maximization-based Binning [8.780958735684958]
  Post-hoc multi-class calibration is a common approach for providing confidence estimates of deep neural network predictions. Recent work has shown that widely used scaling methods underestimate their calibration error. We propose a shared class-wise (sCW) calibration strategy, sharing one calibrator among similar classes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-23T15:31:59Z)
• Better Classifier Calibration for Small Data Sets [0.0]
  We show how generating more data for calibration is able to improve calibration algorithm performance. The proposed approach adds computational cost but considering that the main use case is with small data sets this extra computational cost stays insignificant.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-24T12:27:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.