AgentPRM: Process Reward Models for LLM Agents via Step-Wise Promise and Progress
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.08325v1
- Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 01:53:13 GMT
- Title: AgentPRM: Process Reward Models for LLM Agents via Step-Wise Promise and Progress
- Authors: Zhiheng Xi, Chenyang Liao, Guanyu Li, Yajie Yang, Wenxiang Chen, Zhihao Zhang, Binghai Wang, Senjie Jin, Yuhao Zhou, Jian Guan, Wei Wu, Tao Ji, Tao Gui, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang,
- Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) still encounter challenges in multi-turn decision-making tasks.<n>We build process reward models (PRMs) to evaluate each decision and guide the agent's decision-making process.<n>AgentPRM captures both the interdependence between sequential decisions and their contribution to the final goal.
- Score: 71.02263260394261
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Despite rapid development, large language models (LLMs) still encounter challenges in multi-turn decision-making tasks (i.e., agent tasks) like web shopping and browser navigation, which require making a sequence of intelligent decisions based on environmental feedback. Previous work for LLM agents typically relies on elaborate prompt engineering or fine-tuning with expert trajectories to improve performance. In this work, we take a different perspective: we explore constructing process reward models (PRMs) to evaluate each decision and guide the agent's decision-making process. Unlike LLM reasoning, where each step is scored based on correctness, actions in agent tasks do not have a clear-cut correctness. Instead, they should be evaluated based on their proximity to the goal and the progress they have made. Building on this insight, we propose a re-defined PRM for agent tasks, named AgentPRM, to capture both the interdependence between sequential decisions and their contribution to the final goal. This enables better progress tracking and exploration-exploitation balance. To scalably obtain labeled data for training AgentPRM, we employ a Temporal Difference-based (TD-based) estimation method combined with Generalized Advantage Estimation (GAE), which proves more sample-efficient than prior methods. Extensive experiments across different agentic tasks show that AgentPRM is over $8\times$ more compute-efficient than baselines, and it demonstrates robust improvement when scaling up test-time compute. Moreover, we perform detailed analyses to show how our method works and offer more insights, e.g., applying AgentPRM to the reinforcement learning of LLM agents.
Related papers
- Beyond Fast and Slow: Cognitive-Inspired Elastic Reasoning for Large Language Models [39.03483371038282]
CogER is a framework inspired by human hierarchical reasoning.<n>For queries requiring external tools, we introduce Cognitive Tool-Assisted Reasoning.<n>CogER outperforms state-of-the-art Test-Time scaling methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-17T05:11:58Z) - AOAD-MAT: Transformer-based multi-agent deep reinforcement learning model considering agents' order of action decisions [8.06273583361266]
Multi-agent reinforcement learning focuses on training the behaviors of multiple learning agents that coexist in a shared environment.<n>We propose an Agent Order of Action Decisions-MAT model that considers the order in which agents make decisions.<n>The proposed model explicitly incorporates the sequence of action decisions into the learning process, allowing the model to learn and predict the optimal order of agent actions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-15T09:29:36Z) - RRO: LLM Agent Optimization Through Rising Reward Trajectories [52.579992804584464]
Large language models (LLMs) have exhibited extraordinary performance in a variety of tasks.<n>In practice, agents sensitive to the outcome of certain key steps which makes them likely to fail the task.<n>We propose Reward Rising Optimization (RRO) to mitigate this issue.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-27T05:27:54Z) - ReMA: Learning to Meta-think for LLMs with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [53.817538122688944]
We introduce Reinforced Meta-thinking Agents (ReMA) to elicit meta-thinking behaviors from Reasoning of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>ReMA decouples the reasoning process into two hierarchical agents: a high-level meta-thinking agent responsible for generating strategic oversight and plans, and a low-level reasoning agent for detailed executions.<n> Empirical results from single-turn experiments demonstrate that ReMA outperforms single-agent RL baselines on complex reasoning tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-12T16:05:31Z) - MALT: Improving Reasoning with Multi-Agent LLM Training [67.76186488361685]
MALT (Multi-Agent LLM Training) is a novel post-training strategy that divides the reasoning process into generation, verification, and refinement steps.<n>On MATH, GSM8K, and CSQA, MALT surpasses the same baseline LLM with a relative improvement of 15.66%, 7.42%, and 9.40% respectively.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-02T19:30:36Z) - From Novice to Expert: LLM Agent Policy Optimization via Step-wise Reinforcement Learning [62.54484062185869]
We introduce StepAgent, which utilizes step-wise reward to optimize the agent's reinforcement learning process.<n>We propose implicit-reward and inverse reinforcement learning techniques to facilitate agent reflection and policy adjustment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-06T10:35:11Z) - Watch Every Step! LLM Agent Learning via Iterative Step-Level Process Refinement [50.481380478458945]
Iterative step-level Process Refinement (IPR) framework provides detailed step-by-step guidance to enhance agent training.
Our experiments on three complex agent tasks demonstrate that our framework outperforms a variety of strong baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-17T03:29:13Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.