MM-CRITIC: A Holistic Evaluation of Large Multimodal Models as Multimodal Critique

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.09067v1
• Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 01:30:18 GMT
• Title: MM-CRITIC: A Holistic Evaluation of Large Multimodal Models as Multimodal Critique
• Authors: Gailun Zeng, Ziyang Luo, Hongzhan Lin, Yuchen Tian, Kaixin Li, Ziyang Gong, Jianxiong Guo, Jing Ma,
• Abstract summary: We introduce MM-CRITIC, a holistic benchmark for evaluating the critique ability of LMMs across multiple dimensions.<n> MM-CRITIC collects responses from various LMMs with different model sizes and is composed of 4471 samples.<n>To enhance the evaluation reliability, we integrate expert-informed ground answers into scoring rubrics that guide GPT-4o in annotating responses.
• Score: 23.270725216274688
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The ability of critique is vital for models to self-improve and serve as reliable AI assistants. While extensively studied in language-only settings, multimodal critique of Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) remains underexplored despite their growing capabilities in tasks like captioning and visual reasoning. In this work, we introduce MM-CRITIC, a holistic benchmark for evaluating the critique ability of LMMs across multiple dimensions: basic, correction, and comparison. Covering 8 main task types and over 500 tasks, MM-CRITIC collects responses from various LMMs with different model sizes and is composed of 4471 samples. To enhance the evaluation reliability, we integrate expert-informed ground answers into scoring rubrics that guide GPT-4o in annotating responses and generating reference critiques, which serve as anchors for trustworthy judgments. Extensive experiments validate the effectiveness of MM-CRITIC and provide a comprehensive assessment of leading LMMs' critique capabilities under multiple dimensions. Further analysis reveals some key insights, including the correlation between response quality and critique, and varying critique difficulty across evaluation dimensions. Our code is available at https://github.com/MichealZeng0420/MM-Critic.

Related papers

• MME-CoT: Benchmarking Chain-of-Thought in Large Multimodal Models for Reasoning Quality, Robustness, and Efficiency [63.23935582919081]
  Chain-of-Thought (CoT) has significantly enhanced the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We introduce MME-CoT, a specialized benchmark evaluating the CoT reasoning performance of LMMs.<n>We conduct an in-depth analysis of state-of-the-art LMMs, uncovering several key insights.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-13T18:59:46Z)
• CAMEL-Bench: A Comprehensive Arabic LMM Benchmark [10.20074702234283]
  We develop a comprehensive LMM evaluation benchmark for the Arabic language to represent a large population of over 400 million speakers. The proposed benchmark comprises eight diverse domains and 38 sub-domains including, multi-image understanding, complex visual perception, handwritten document understanding, video understanding, medical imaging, plant diseases, and remote sensing-based land use understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T17:59:38Z)
• MMIE: Massive Multimodal Interleaved Comprehension Benchmark for Large Vision-Language Models [71.36392373876505]
  We introduce MMIE, a large-scale benchmark for evaluating interleaved multimodal comprehension and generation in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs)<n>MMIE comprises 20K meticulously curated multimodal queries, spanning 3 categories, 12 fields, and 102 subfields, including mathematics, coding, physics, literature, health, and arts.<n>It supports both interleaved inputs and outputs, offering a mix of multiple-choice and open-ended question formats to evaluate diverse competencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T04:15:00Z)
• Unsolvable Problem Detection: Robust Understanding Evaluation for Large Multimodal Models [84.78457918843165]
  Unsolvable Problem Detection (UPD) is a novel task to evaluate the robust understanding capability of Large Multimodal Models (LMMs)<n>UPD assesses the LMM's ability to withhold answers when encountering unsolvable problems of multiple-choice question answering.<n>This paper introduces the MM-UPD Bench, a benchmark for assessing performance across various ability dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-29T17:59:53Z)
• CriticEval: Evaluating Large Language Model as Critic [110.29766259843453]
  CriticEval is a novel benchmark designed to comprehensively and reliably evaluate critique ability of Large Language Models. To ensure the comprehensiveness, CriticEval evaluates critique ability from four dimensions across nine diverse task scenarios. To ensure the reliability, a large number of critiques are annotated to serve as references.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T12:38:59Z)
• MM-BigBench: Evaluating Multimodal Models on Multimodal Content Comprehension Tasks [56.60050181186531]
  We introduce MM-BigBench, which incorporates a diverse range of metrics to offer an extensive evaluation of the performance of various models and instructions. Our paper evaluates a total of 20 language models (14 MLLMs) on 14 multimodal datasets spanning 6 tasks, with 10 instructions for each task, and derives novel insights.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-13T11:57:04Z)
• Critique Ability of Large Language Models [38.34144195927209]
  This study explores the ability of large language models (LLMs) to deliver accurate critiques across various tasks. We develop a benchmark called CriticBench, which comprises 3K high-quality natural language queries and corresponding model responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-07T14:12:15Z)
• MM-Vet: Evaluating Large Multimodal Models for Integrated Capabilities [153.37868034779385]
  We propose MM-Vet, an evaluation benchmark that examines large multimodal models (LMMs) on complicated multimodal tasks.<n>Recent LMMs have shown various intriguing abilities, such as solving math problems written on the blackboard, reasoning about events and celebrities in news images, and explaining visual jokes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-04T17:59:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.