GuardFed: A Trustworthy Federated Learning Framework Against Dual-Facet Attacks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.09294v1
• Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 01:45:10 GMT
• Title: GuardFed: A Trustworthy Federated Learning Framework Against Dual-Facet Attacks
• Authors: Yanli Li, Yanan Zhou, Zhongliang Guo, Nan Yang, Yuning Zhang, Huaming Chen, Dong Yuan, Weiping Ding, Witold Pedrycz,
• Abstract summary: Federated learning (FL) enables privacy-preserving collaborative model training but remains vulnerable to adversarial behaviors.<n>We introduce the Dual-Facet Attack (DFA), a novel threat model that concurrently undermines predictive accuracy and group fairness.<n>We propose GuardFed, a self-adaptive defense framework that maintains a fairness-aware reference model using a small amount of clean server data.
• Score: 56.983319121358555
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Federated learning (FL) enables privacy-preserving collaborative model training but remains vulnerable to adversarial behaviors that compromise model utility or fairness across sensitive groups. While extensive studies have examined attacks targeting either objective, strategies that simultaneously degrade both utility and fairness remain largely unexplored. To bridge this gap, we introduce the Dual-Facet Attack (DFA), a novel threat model that concurrently undermines predictive accuracy and group fairness. Two variants, Synchronous DFA (S-DFA) and Split DFA (Sp-DFA), are further proposed to capture distinct real-world collusion scenarios. Experimental results show that existing robust FL defenses, including hybrid aggregation schemes, fail to resist DFAs effectively. To counter these threats, we propose GuardFed, a self-adaptive defense framework that maintains a fairness-aware reference model using a small amount of clean server data augmented with synthetic samples. In each training round, GuardFed computes a dual-perspective trust score for every client by jointly evaluating its utility deviation and fairness degradation, thereby enabling selective aggregation of trustworthy updates. Extensive experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate that GuardFed consistently preserves both accuracy and fairness under diverse non-IID and adversarial conditions, achieving state-of-the-art performance compared with existing robust FL methods.

Related papers

• Debiased Dual-Invariant Defense for Adversarially Robust Person Re-Identification [52.63017280231648]
  Person re-identification (ReID) is a fundamental task in many real-world applications such as pedestrian trajectory tracking.<n>Person ReID models are highly susceptible to adversarial attacks, where imperceptible perturbations to pedestrian images can cause entirely incorrect predictions.<n>We propose a dual-invariant defense framework composed of two main phases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-13T03:56:40Z)
• FERD: Fairness-Enhanced Data-Free Robustness Distillation [33.11199368530121]
  We present the first Fairness-Enhanced data-free Robustness Distillation (FERD) framework to adjust the proportion and distribution of adversarial examples.<n>FERD achieves state-of-the-art worst-class robustness under all adversarial attack.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-25T06:22:11Z)
• ProDiGy: Proximity- and Dissimilarity-Based Byzantine-Robust Federated Learning [8.763134188675718]
  Federated Learning (FL) emerged as a widely studied paradigm for distributed learning.<n>We propose a new Byzantine-robust FL algorithm called ProDiGy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-11T15:25:59Z)
• FLAegis: A Two-Layer Defense Framework for Federated Learning Against Poisoning Attacks [2.6599014990168843]
  Federated Learning (FL) has become a powerful technique for training Machine Learning (ML) models in a decentralized manner.<n>Third parties, known as Byzantine clients, can poison the training process by submitting false model updates.<n>This study introduces FLAegis, a two-stage defensive framework designed to identify Byzantine clients and improve the robustness of FL systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-26T07:09:15Z)
• MISLEADER: Defending against Model Extraction with Ensembles of Distilled Models [56.09354775405601]
  Model extraction attacks aim to replicate the functionality of a black-box model through query access.<n>Most existing defenses presume that attacker queries have out-of-distribution (OOD) samples, enabling them to detect and disrupt suspicious inputs.<n>We propose MISLEADER, a novel defense strategy that does not rely on OOD assumptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T01:37:09Z)
• Logit Calibration and Feature Contrast for Robust Federated Learning on Non-IID Data [45.11652096723593]
  Federated learning (FL) is a privacy-preserving distributed framework for collaborative model training on devices in edge networks. This paper proposes FatCC, which incorporates local logit underlineCalibration and global feature underlineContrast into the vanilla federated adversarial training process from both logit and feature perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-10T06:35:25Z)
• Learn from the Past: A Proxy Guided Adversarial Defense Framework with Self Distillation Regularization [53.04697800214848]
  Adversarial Training (AT) is pivotal in fortifying the robustness of deep learning models. AT methods, relying on direct iterative updates for target model's defense, frequently encounter obstacles such as unstable training and catastrophic overfitting. We present a general proxy guided defense framework, LAST' (bf Learn from the Pbf ast)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T13:13:41Z)
• Avoid Adversarial Adaption in Federated Learning by Multi-Metric Investigations [55.2480439325792]
  Federated Learning (FL) facilitates decentralized machine learning model training, preserving data privacy, lowering communication costs, and boosting model performance through diversified data sources. FL faces vulnerabilities such as poisoning attacks, undermining model integrity with both untargeted performance degradation and targeted backdoor attacks. We define a new notion of strong adaptive adversaries, capable of adapting to multiple objectives simultaneously. MESAS is the first defense robust against strong adaptive adversaries, effective in real-world data scenarios, with an average overhead of just 24.37 seconds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T11:44:42Z)
• Combating Exacerbated Heterogeneity for Robust Models in Federated Learning [91.88122934924435]
  Combination of adversarial training and federated learning can lead to the undesired robustness deterioration. We propose a novel framework called Slack Federated Adversarial Training (SFAT) We verify the rationality and effectiveness of SFAT on various benchmarked and real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-01T06:16:15Z)
• Delving into the Adversarial Robustness of Federated Learning [41.409961662754405]
  In Federated Learning (FL), models are as fragile as centrally trained models against adversarial examples. We propose a novel algorithm called Decision Boundary based Federated Adversarial Training (DBFAT) to improve both accuracy and robustness of FL systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-19T04:54:25Z)
• FLIP: A Provable Defense Framework for Backdoor Mitigation in Federated Learning [66.56240101249803]
  We study how hardening benign clients can affect the global model (and the malicious clients) We propose a trigger reverse engineering based defense and show that our method can achieve improvement with guarantee robustness. Our results on eight competing SOTA defense methods show the empirical superiority of our method on both single-shot and continuous FL backdoor attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-23T22:24:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.