GSAP-ERE: Fine-Grained Scholarly Entity and Relation Extraction Focused on Machine Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.09411v1
• Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 01:52:50 GMT
• Title: GSAP-ERE: Fine-Grained Scholarly Entity and Relation Extraction Focused on Machine Learning
• Authors: Wolfgang Otto, Lu Gan, Sharmila Upadhyaya, Saurav Karmakar, Stefan Dietze,
• Abstract summary: GSAP-ERE is a manually curated fine-grained dataset with 10 entity types and 18 semantically categorized relation types.<n>We show that our dataset enables fine-tuned models to automatically extract information relevant for downstream tasks.<n>We observe that the performance of state-of-the-art prompting methods is largely outperformed by our best fine-tuned model.
• Score: 6.628044635306078
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Research in Machine Learning (ML) and AI evolves rapidly. Information Extraction (IE) from scientific publications enables to identify information about research concepts and resources on a large scale and therefore is a pathway to improve understanding and reproducibility of ML-related research. To extract and connect fine-grained information in ML-related research, e.g. method training and data usage, we introduce GSAP-ERE. It is a manually curated fine-grained dataset with 10 entity types and 18 semantically categorized relation types, containing mentions of 63K entities and 35K relations from the full text of 100 ML publications. We show that our dataset enables fine-tuned models to automatically extract information relevant for downstream tasks ranging from knowledge graph (KG) construction, to monitoring the computational reproducibility of AI research at scale. Additionally, we use our dataset as a test suite to explore prompting strategies for IE using Large Language Models (LLM). We observe that the performance of state-of-the-art LLM prompting methods is largely outperformed by our best fine-tuned baseline model (NER: 80.6%, RE: 54.0% for the fine-tuned model vs. NER: 44.4%, RE: 10.1% for the LLM). This disparity of performance between supervised models and unsupervised usage of LLMs suggests datasets like GSAP-ERE are needed to advance research in the domain of scholarly information extraction.

Related papers

• Analytical Survey of Learning with Low-Resource Data: From Analysis to Investigation [192.53529928861818]
  Learning with high-resource data has demonstrated substantial success in artificial intelligence (AI)<n>However, the costs associated with data annotation and model training remain significant.<n>This survey employs active sampling theory to analyze the generalization error and label complexity associated with learning from low-resource data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T03:15:42Z)
• Large Language Model-Based Agents for Automated Research Reproducibility: An Exploratory Study in Alzheimer's Disease [1.9938547353667109]
  We used the "Quick Access" dataset of the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center.<n>We identified highly cited published research manuscripts using NACC data.<n>We created a simulated research team of LLM-based autonomous agents tasked with writing and executing code.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T01:31:55Z)
• MOLE: Metadata Extraction and Validation in Scientific Papers Using LLMs [48.73595915402094]
  MOLE is a framework that automatically extracts metadata attributes from scientific papers covering datasets of languages other than Arabic.<n>Our methodology processes entire documents across multiple input formats and incorporates robust validation mechanisms for consistent output.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T10:31:26Z)
• A Benchmark for End-to-End Zero-Shot Biomedical Relation Extraction with LLMs: Experiments with OpenAI Models [8.888403936226185]
  We study patterns in the performance of OpenAI LLMs across a diverse sampling of biomedical relation extraction tasks.<n>Our work is the first to study and compare the performance of the GPT-4, o1 and GPT-OSS for the end-to-end zero-shot biomedical RE task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-05T07:08:54Z)
• Large Language Models and Synthetic Data for Monitoring Dataset Mentions in Research Papers [0.0]
  This paper presents a machine learning framework that automates dataset mention detection across research domains.<n>We employ zero-shot extraction from research papers, an LLM-as-a-Judge for quality assessment, and a reasoning agent for refinement to generate a weakly supervised synthetic dataset.<n>At inference, a ModernBERT-based classifier efficiently filters dataset mentions, reducing computational overhead while maintaining high recall.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-14T16:16:02Z)
• Enhancing Knowledge Retrieval with In-Context Learning and Semantic Search through Generative AI [3.9773527114058855]
  We propose a novel methodology that combines the generative capabilities of Large Language Models with the fast and accurate retrieval capabilities of vector databases. The developed model, Generative Text Retrieval (GTR), is adaptable to both unstructured and structured data with minor refinement. The refined model, Generative Tabular Text Retrieval (GTR-T), demonstrated its efficiency in large database querying.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T23:08:06Z)
• SciRIFF: A Resource to Enhance Language Model Instruction-Following over Scientific Literature [97.31347312130119]
  SciRIFF (Scientific Resource for Instruction-Following and Finetuning) is a dataset of 137K instruction-following instances for training and evaluation, covering 54 tasks.<n>These tasks span five core scientific literature understanding capabilities: information extraction, summarization, question answering, claim verification, and classification.<n> SciRIFF is unique in being entirely expert-written, high-quality instruction-following dataset for extracting and synthesizing information from research literature across diverse scientific fields.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-10T21:22:08Z)
• Using Large Language Models to Enrich the Documentation of Datasets for Machine Learning [1.8270184406083445]
  We explore using large language models (LLM) and prompting strategies to automatically extract dimensions from documents. Our approach could aid data publishers and practitioners in creating machine-readable documentation. We have released an open-source tool implementing our approach and a replication package, including the experiments' code and results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T10:09:28Z)
• Unsupervised Information Refinement Training of Large Language Models for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [128.01050030936028]
  We propose an information refinement training method named InFO-RAG. InFO-RAG is low-cost and general across various tasks. It improves the performance of LLaMA2 by an average of 9.39% relative points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T08:24:38Z)
• MatPlotAgent: Method and Evaluation for LLM-Based Agentic Scientific Data Visualization [86.61052121715689]
  MatPlotAgent is a model-agnostic framework designed to automate scientific data visualization tasks. MatPlotBench is a high-quality benchmark consisting of 100 human-verified test cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-18T04:28:28Z)
• ExaRanker-Open: Synthetic Explanation for IR using Open-Source LLMs [60.81649785463651]
  We introduce ExaRanker-Open, where we adapt and explore the use of open-source language models to generate explanations. Our findings reveal that incorporating explanations consistently enhances neural rankers, with benefits escalating as the LLM size increases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-09T11:23:14Z)
• LLMs for Knowledge Graph Construction and Reasoning: Recent Capabilities and Future Opportunities [66.36633042421387]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) for Knowledge Graph (KG) construction and reasoning evaluated.<n>We propose AutoKG, a multi-agent-based approach employing LLMs and external sources for KG construction and reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T15:56:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.