Evaluating Modern Large Language Models on Low-Resource and Morphologically Rich Languages:A Cross-Lingual Benchmark Across Cantonese, Japanese, and Turkish

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.10664v1
• Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2025 22:09:53 GMT
• Title: Evaluating Modern Large Language Models on Low-Resource and Morphologically Rich Languages:A Cross-Lingual Benchmark Across Cantonese, Japanese, and Turkish
• Authors: Chengxuan Xia, Qianye Wu, Hongbin Guan, Sixuan Tian, Yilun Hao, Xiaoyu Wu,
• Abstract summary: GPT-4o, GPT-4, Claude3.5Sonnet, LLaMA3.1, MistralLarge2, LLaMA-2Chat13B, and Mistral7BInstruct are evaluated.<n>Our benchmark spans four diverse tasks: open-domain question answering, document summarization, English-to-X translation, and culturally grounded dialogue.
• Score: 12.286855282078305
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have achieved impressive results in high-resource languages like English, yet their effectiveness in low-resource and morphologically rich languages remains underexplored. In this paper, we present a comprehensive evaluation of seven cutting-edge LLMs -- including GPT-4o, GPT-4, Claude~3.5~Sonnet, LLaMA~3.1, Mistral~Large~2, LLaMA-2~Chat~13B, and Mistral~7B~Instruct -- on a new cross-lingual benchmark covering \textbf{Cantonese, Japanese, and Turkish}. Our benchmark spans four diverse tasks: open-domain question answering, document summarization, English-to-X translation, and culturally grounded dialogue. We combine \textbf{human evaluations} (rating fluency, factual accuracy, and cultural appropriateness) with automated metrics (e.g., BLEU, ROUGE) to assess model performance. Our results reveal that while the largest proprietary models (GPT-4o, GPT-4, Claude~3.5) generally lead across languages and tasks, significant gaps persist in culturally nuanced understanding and morphological generalization. Notably, GPT-4o demonstrates robust multilingual performance even on cross-lingual tasks, and Claude~3.5~Sonnet achieves competitive accuracy on knowledge and reasoning benchmarks. However, all models struggle to some extent with the unique linguistic challenges of each language, such as Turkish agglutinative morphology and Cantonese colloquialisms. Smaller open-source models (LLaMA-2~13B, Mistral~7B) lag substantially in fluency and accuracy, highlighting the resource disparity. We provide detailed quantitative results, qualitative error analysis, and discuss implications for developing more culturally aware and linguistically generalizable LLMs. Our benchmark and evaluation data are released to foster reproducibility and further research.

Related papers

• From Phonemes to Meaning: Evaluating Large Language Models on Tamil [1.0493506909428438]
  ILAKKANAM is the first Tamil-specific linguistic evaluation benchmark manually curated using 820 questions from Sri Lankan school-level Tamil subject examination papers.<n>Our results show that Gemini 2.5 achieves the highest overall performance, while open-source models lag behind.<n>No strong correlation is observed between a model's overall performance and its ability to identify linguistic categories, suggesting that performance may be driven by exposure rather than genuine understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-15T23:41:16Z)
• LinguaMark: Do Multimodal Models Speak Fairly? A Benchmark-Based Evaluation [2.9248916859490173]
  We introduce a benchmark designed to evaluate state-of-the-art LMMs on a multilingual Visual Question Answering (VQA) task.<n>Our dataset comprises 6,875 image-text pairs spanning 11 languages and five social attributes.<n>We evaluate models using three key metrics: Bias, Answer Relevancy, and Faithfulness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-09T20:45:04Z)
• MMLU-ProX: A Multilingual Benchmark for Advanced Large Language Model Evaluation [86.7047714187813]
  MMLU-ProX is a benchmark covering 29 languages, built on an English benchmark.<n>Each language version consists of 11,829 identical questions, enabling direct cross-linguistic comparisons.<n>To meet efficient evaluation needs, we provide a lite version containing 658 questions per language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-13T15:59:20Z)
• How does a Multilingual LM Handle Multiple Languages? [0.0]
  This study critically examines capabilities in multilingual understanding, semantic representation, and cross-lingual knowledge transfer.<n>It assesses semantic similarity by analyzing multilingual word embeddings for consistency using cosine similarity.<n>It examines BLOOM-1.7B and Qwen2 through Named Entity Recognition and sentence similarity tasks to understand their linguistic structures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-06T18:08:14Z)
• CODEOFCONDUCT at Multilingual Counterspeech Generation: A Context-Aware Model for Robust Counterspeech Generation in Low-Resource Languages [1.9263811967110864]
  This paper introduces a context-aware model for robust counterspeech generation, which achieved significant success in the MCG-COLING-2025 shared task.<n>By leveraging a simulated annealing algorithm fine-tuned on multilingual datasets, the model generates factually accurate responses to hate speech.<n>We demonstrate state-of-the-art performance across four languages, with our system ranking first for Basque, second for Italian, and third for both English and Spanish.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-01T03:36:31Z)
• IrokoBench: A New Benchmark for African Languages in the Age of Large Language Models [18.083861654053585]
  This paper introduces IrokoBench -- a human-translated benchmark dataset for 17 typologically-diverse low-resource African languages.<n>We use IrokoBench to evaluate zero-shot, few-shot, and translate-test settings(where test sets are translated into English) across 10 open and six proprietary language models.<n>We observe a significant performance gap between open and proprietary models, with the highest performing open model, Gemma 2 27B only at 63% of the best-performing proprietary model GPT-4o performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T15:23:08Z)
• OMGEval: An Open Multilingual Generative Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Models [59.54423478596468]
  We introduce OMGEval, the first Open-source Multilingual Generative test set that can assess the capability of LLMs in different languages. For each language, OMGEval provides 804 open-ended questions, covering a wide range of important capabilities of LLMs. Specifically, the current version of OMGEval includes 5 languages (i.e., Zh, Ru, Fr, Es, Ar)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T04:42:41Z)
• Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Reranking with Large Language Models for Low-Resource Languages [51.301942056881146]
  We investigate how large language models (LLMs) function as rerankers in cross-lingual information retrieval systems for African languages. Our implementation covers English and four African languages (Hausa, Somali, Swahili, and Yoruba) We examine cross-lingual reranking with queries in English and passages in the African languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-26T18:38:54Z)
• Breaking Language Barriers in Multilingual Mathematical Reasoning: Insights and Observations [59.056367787688146]
  This paper pioneers exploring and training powerful Multilingual Math Reasoning (xMR) LLMs. We construct the first multilingual math reasoning instruction dataset, MGSM8KInstruct, encompassing ten distinct languages. By utilizing translation, we construct the first multilingual math reasoning instruction dataset, MGSM8KInstruct, encompassing ten distinct languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T08:09:20Z)
• HAE-RAE Bench: Evaluation of Korean Knowledge in Language Models [0.0]
  We introduce the HAE-RAE Bench, a dataset curated to challenge models lacking Korean cultural and contextual depth. The dataset encompasses six downstream tasks across four domains: vocabulary, history, general knowledge, and reading comprehension.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-06T04:38:16Z)
• Democratizing LLMs for Low-Resource Languages by Leveraging their English Dominant Abilities with Linguistically-Diverse Prompts [75.33019401706188]
  Large language models (LLMs) are known to effectively perform tasks by simply observing few exemplars. We propose to assemble synthetic exemplars from a diverse set of high-resource languages to prompt the LLMs to translate from any language into English. Our unsupervised prompting method performs on par with supervised few-shot learning in LLMs of different sizes for translations between English and 13 Indic and 21 African low-resource languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-20T08:27:47Z)
• Document-Level Machine Translation with Large Language Models [91.03359121149595]
  Large language models (LLMs) can produce coherent, cohesive, relevant, and fluent answers for various natural language processing (NLP) tasks. This paper provides an in-depth evaluation of LLMs' ability on discourse modeling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-05T03:49:06Z)
• Few-shot Learning with Multilingual Language Models [66.49496434282564]
  We train multilingual autoregressive language models on a balanced corpus covering a diverse set of languages. Our largest model sets new state of the art in few-shot learning in more than 20 representative languages. We present a detailed analysis of where the model succeeds and fails, showing in particular that it enables cross-lingual in-context learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-20T16:52:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.