A Mathematical Framework for AI Singularity: Conditions, Bounds, and Control of Recursive Improvement

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.10668v1
• Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2025 21:25:38 GMT
• Title: A Mathematical Framework for AI Singularity: Conditions, Bounds, and Control of Recursive Improvement
• Abstract summary: We develop an analytic framework for self-improvement that links capability growth to resource build-out and deployment policies.<n>We derive decision rules that map observable series into yes/no certificates for runaway versus nonsingular behavior.<n>The framework yields falsifiable tests based on how fast improvement accelerates relative to its current level.
• Score: 1.932555230783329
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: AI systems improve by drawing on more compute, data, energy, and better training methods. This paper asks a precise, testable version of the "runaway growth" question: under what measurable conditions could capability escalate without bound in finite time, and under what conditions can that be ruled out? We develop an analytic framework for recursive self-improvement that links capability growth to resource build-out and deployment policies. Physical and information-theoretic limits from power, bandwidth, and memory define a service envelope that caps instantaneous improvement. An endogenous growth model couples capital to compute, data, and energy and defines a critical boundary separating superlinear from subcritical regimes. We derive decision rules that map observable series (facility power, IO bandwidth, training throughput, benchmark losses, and spending) into yes/no certificates for runaway versus nonsingular behavior. The framework yields falsifiable tests based on how fast improvement accelerates relative to its current level, and it provides safety controls that are directly implementable in practice, such as power caps, throughput throttling, and evaluation gates. Analytical case studies cover capped-power, saturating-data, and investment-amplified settings, illustrating when the envelope binds and when it does not. The approach is simulation-free and grounded in measurements engineers already collect. Limitations include dependence on the chosen capability metric and on regularity diagnostics; future work will address stochastic dynamics, multi-agent competition, and abrupt architectural shifts. Overall, the results replace speculation with testable conditions and deployable controls for certifying or precluding an AI singularity.

Related papers

• DIRECT: When and Where Should You Allocate Test-Time Compute in Embodied Planners? [57.585275546688116]
  Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly deployed as high-level planners for embodied agents.<n>We argue that choosing when and where to spend test-time compute is central to bringing frontier performance to the real world.<n>We introduce DIRECT, a routing framework that uses multimodal scene context to allocate compute per prompt.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-10T17:58:49Z)
• VASO: Formally Verifiable Self-Evolving Skills for Physical AI Agents [57.240036084348354]
  We introduce VASO, a framework for verification-guided self-evolution of robot skill contracts.<n>VASO verifies logically inconsistent skill contracts, then verifies plans induced by the skill against global and local temporal specifications.<n>On Clearpath Jackal and PX4 quadcopter tasks, VASO reaches 97.2% formal-specification compliance using fewer than 100 optimization samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-03T20:02:35Z)
• Cognitive Friction: A Decision-Theoretic Framework for Bounded Deliberation in Tool-Using Agents [0.0]
  Unconstrained tool-using agents must decide which information source to query and act on.<n>We propose the Triadic Cognitive Architecture (TCA), a decision-theoretic framework that formalizes these failure modes via cognitive friction.<n>We validate TCA in two controlled environments designed to isolate stopping quality, action selection under congestion, and temporal urgency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-31T17:30:25Z)
• Position Paper: From Edge AI to Adaptive Edge AI [4.915029686150193]
  Edge AI is often framed as model compression and deployment under tight constraints.<n>We argue a stronger operational thesis: Edge AI in realistic deployments is necessarily adaptive.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-31T08:12:29Z)
• Self-Supervised Path Planning in Unstructured Environments via Global-Guided Differentiable Hard Constraint Projection [5.665217514922631]
  We propose a self-supervised framework for deploying deep learning agents for autonomous navigation in unstructured environments.<n>To mitigate data scarcity, we construct a Global-Guided Artificial Potential Field (G-APF), which provides dense supervision signals without manual labeling.<n> benchmarks on a test set of 20,000 scenarios demonstrate an 88.75% success rate, substantiating the enhanced operational safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-27T08:37:21Z)
• Interpretable Hybrid Deep Q-Learning Framework for IoT-Based Food Spoilage Prediction with Synthetic Data Generation and Hardware Validation [0.5417521241272645]
  The need for an intelligent, real-time spoilage prediction system has become critical in modern IoT-driven food supply chains.<n>We propose a hybrid reinforcement learning framework integrating Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) for enhanced spoilage prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-22T12:59:48Z)
• PowerGrow: Feasible Co-Growth of Structures and Dynamics for Power Grid Synthesis [75.14189839277928]
  We present PowerGrow, a co-generative framework that significantly reduces computational overhead while maintaining operational validity.<n> Experiments across benchmark settings show that PowerGrow outperforms prior diffusion models in fidelity and diversity.<n>This demonstrates its ability to generate operationally valid and realistic power grid scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-29T01:47:27Z)
• Backpropagation-Free Test-Time Adaptation via Probabilistic Gaussian Alignment [16.352863226512984]
  Test-time adaptation (TTA) enhances the zero-shot robustness under distribution shifts by leveraging unlabeled test data during inference.<n>Most methods rely on backpropagation or iterative optimization, which limits scalability and hinders real-time deployment.<n>We propose ADAPT, an Advanced Distribution-Aware and back propagation-free Test-time adaptation method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-21T13:42:49Z)
• COIN: Uncertainty-Guarding Selective Question Answering for Foundation Models with Provable Risk Guarantees [51.5976496056012]
  COIN is an uncertainty-guarding selection framework that calibrates statistically valid thresholds to filter a single generated answer per question.<n>COIN estimates the empirical error rate on a calibration set and applies confidence interval methods to establish a high-probability upper bound on the true error rate.<n>We demonstrate COIN's robustness in risk control, strong test-time power in retaining admissible answers, and predictive efficiency under limited calibration data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-25T07:04:49Z)
• Beyond 'Aha!': Toward Systematic Meta-Abilities Alignment in Large Reasoning Models [86.88657425848547]
  Large reasoning models (LRMs) already possess a latent capacity for long chain-of-thought reasoning.<n>We explicitly align models with three meta-abilities: deduction, induction, and abduction, using automatically generated, self-verifiable tasks.<n>Our three stage-pipeline individual alignment, parameter-space merging, and domain-specific reinforcement learning, boosts performance by over 10% relative to instruction-tuned baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-15T17:58:33Z)
• Conformal Calibration: Ensuring the Reliability of Black-Box AI in Wireless Systems [36.407171992845456]
  The paper reviews conformal calibration, a general framework that moves beyond the state of the art by adopting computationally lightweight, advanced statistical tools.<n>By weaving conformal calibration into the AI model lifecycle, network operators can establish confidence in black-box AI models as a dependable enabling technology for wireless systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-12T19:05:00Z)
• Distilling Calibration via Conformalized Credal Inference [30.8135853479509]
  One way to enhance reliability is through uncertainty quantification via Bayesian inference.<n>This paper introduces a low-complexity methodology to address this challenge by distilling calibration information from a more complex model.<n> Experiments on visual and language tasks demonstrate that the proposed approach, termed Conformalized Distillation for Credal Inference (CD-CI), significantly improves calibration performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-10T15:57:23Z)
• Cognitive Edge Computing: A Comprehensive Survey on Optimizing Large Models and AI Agents for Pervasive Deployment [12.921833067052928]
  This article surveys Cognitive Edge Computing as a practical and methodical pathway for deploying reasoning-capable Large Language Models (LLMs) and autonomous AI agents on resource-constrained devices at the network edge.<n>We present a unified, cognition-preserving framework aimed at retaining multi-step reasoning under tight memory/compute budgets.<n>We synthesize advances in efficient Transformer design, multimodal integration, hardware-aware compilation, privacy-preserving learning, and agentic tool use, and map them to edge-specific operating envelopes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-04T06:17:48Z)
• Large Continual Instruction Assistant [59.585544987096974]
  Continual Instruction Tuning (CIT) is adopted to instruct Large Models to follow human intent data by data.<n>Existing update gradient would heavily destroy the performance on previous datasets during CIT process.<n>We propose a general continual instruction tuning framework to address the challenge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T11:24:59Z)
• Action-Quantized Offline Reinforcement Learning for Robotic Skill Learning [68.16998247593209]
  offline reinforcement learning (RL) paradigm provides recipe to convert static behavior datasets into policies that can perform better than the policy that collected the data. In this paper, we propose an adaptive scheme for action quantization. We show that several state-of-the-art offline RL methods such as IQL, CQL, and BRAC improve in performance on benchmarks when combined with our proposed discretization scheme.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-18T06:07:10Z)
• Understanding, Predicting and Better Resolving Q-Value Divergence in Offline-RL [86.0987896274354]
  We first identify a fundamental pattern, self-excitation, as the primary cause of Q-value estimation divergence in offline RL. We then propose a novel Self-Excite Eigenvalue Measure (SEEM) metric to measure the evolving property of Q-network at training. For the first time, our theory can reliably decide whether the training will diverge at an early stage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-06T17:57:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.