Expert Consensus-based Video-Based Assessment Tool for Workflow Analysis in Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery: Development and Validation of ColoWorkflow

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.10766v1
• Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 19:33:36 GMT
• Title: Expert Consensus-based Video-Based Assessment Tool for Workflow Analysis in Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery: Development and Validation of ColoWorkflow
• Authors: Pooja P Jain, Pietro Mascagni, Giuseppe Massimiani, Nabani Banik, Marta Goglia, Lorenzo Arboit, Britty Baby, Andrea Balla, Ludovica Baldari, Gianfranco Silecchia, Claudio Fiorillo, CompSurg Colorectal Experts Group, Sergio Alfieri, Salvador Morales-Conde, Deborah S Keller, Luigi Boni, Nicolas Padoy,
• Abstract summary: Video-based assessment (VBA) offers an opportunity to generate data-driven insights to reduce variability, optimize training, and improve surgical performance.<n>Existing tools for workflow analysis remain difficult to standardize and implement.<n>This study aims to develop and validate a VBA tool for workflow analysis across minimally invasive colorectal procedures.
• Score: 4.2710633896098456
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Minimally invasive colorectal surgery is characterized by procedural variability, a difficult learning curve, and complications that impact quality and outcomes. Video-based assessment (VBA) offers an opportunity to generate data-driven insights to reduce variability, optimize training, and improve surgical performance. However, existing tools for workflow analysis remain difficult to standardize and implement. This study aims to develop and validate a VBA tool for workflow analysis across minimally invasive colorectal procedures. A Delphi process was conducted to achieve consensus on generalizable workflow descriptors. The resulting framework informed the development of a new VBA tool, ColoWorkflow. Independent raters then applied ColoWorkflow to a multicentre video dataset of laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgery (CRS). Applicability and inter-rater reliability were evaluated. Consensus was achieved for 10 procedure-agnostic phases and 34 procedure-specific steps describing CRS workflows. ColoWorkflow was developed and applied to 54 colorectal operative videos (left and right hemicolectomies, sigmoid and rectosigmoid resections, and total proctocolectomies) from five centres. The tool demonstrated broad applicability, with all but one label utilized. Inter-rater reliability was moderate, with mean Cohen's K of 0.71 for phases and 0.66 for steps. Most discrepancies arose at phase transitions and step boundary definitions. ColoWorkflow is the first consensus-based, validated VBA tool for comprehensive workflow analysis in minimally invasive CRS. It establishes a reproducible framework for video-based performance assessment, enabling benchmarking across institutions and supporting the development of artificial intelligence-driven workflow recognition. Its adoption may standardize training, accelerate competency acquisition, and advance data-informed surgical quality improvement.

Related papers

• ProtoFlow: Interpretable and Robust Surgical Workflow Modeling with Learned Dynamic Scene Graph Prototypes [42.15644075070622]
  ProtoFlow is a novel framework that learns dynamic graph prototypes to model complex surgical events.<n>We evaluate our approach on the fine-grained CAT-SG dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-16T04:59:58Z)
• Enhancing Lung Cancer Treatment Outcome Prediction through Semantic Feature Engineering Using Large Language Models [5.778370321351782]
  We introduce a framework that uses Large Language Models (LLMs) as Goal-oriented Knowledge Curators (GKC)<n>GKC converts laboratory, genomic, and medication data into high-fidelity, task-aligned features.<n>We benchmarked GKC against expert-engineered features, direct text embeddings, and an end-to-end transformer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-01T23:56:45Z)
• MedDCR: Learning to Design Agentic Workflows for Medical Coding [55.51674334874892]
  Medical coding converts free-text clinical notes into standardized diagnostic and procedural codes.<n>We present MedDCR, a closed-loop framework that treats design as a learning problem.<n>On benchmark datasets, MedDCR outperforms state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-17T13:30:51Z)
• An Interpretable Transformer-Based Foundation Model for Cross-Procedural Skill Assessment Using Raw fNIRS Signals [0.0]
  We introduce an interpretable transformer-based foundation model trained on minimally processed fNIRS signals for cross-procedural skill assessment.<n>The model achieves greater than 88% classification accuracy on all tasks, with Matthews Correlation Coefficient exceeding 0.91 on ETI.<n>It generalizes to a novel emergency airway procedure--cricothyrotomy--using fewer than 30 labeled samples and a lightweight (less than 2k parameter) adapter module.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-21T18:30:58Z)
• Surgical Foundation Model Leveraging Compression and Entropy Maximization for Image-Guided Surgical Assistance [50.486523249499115]
  Real-time video understanding is critical to guide procedures in minimally invasive surgery (MIS)<n>We propose Compress-to-Explore (C2E), a novel self-supervised framework to learn compact, informative representations from surgical videos.<n>C2E uses entropy-maximizing decoders to compress images while preserving clinically relevant details, improving encoder performance without labeled data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-16T14:02:24Z)
• Turning Conversations into Workflows: A Framework to Extract and Evaluate Dialog Workflows for Service AI Agents [65.36060818857109]
  We present a novel framework for extracting and evaluating dialog from historical interactions.<n>Our extraction process consists of two key stages: (1) a retrieval step to select relevant conversations based on key procedural elements, and (2) a structured workflow generation process using a question-answer-based chain-of-thought (QA-CoT) prompting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-24T16:55:15Z)
• AFlow: Automating Agentic Workflow Generation [36.61172223528231]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable potential in solving complex tasks across diverse domains.<n>We introduce AFlow, an automated framework that efficiently explores this space using Monte Carlo Tree Search.<n> Empirical evaluations across six benchmark datasets demonstrate AFlow's efficacy, yielding a 5.7% average improvement over state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T17:40:40Z)
• Benchmarking Agentic Workflow Generation [80.74757493266057]
  We introduce WorfBench, a unified workflow generation benchmark with multi-faceted scenarios and intricate graph workflow structures.<n>We also present WorfEval, a systemic evaluation protocol utilizing subsequence and subgraph matching algorithms.<n>We observe that the generated can enhance downstream tasks, enabling them to achieve superior performance with less time during inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T12:41:19Z)
• Surgical Phase Recognition in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy [57.929132269036245]
  We propose a Transformer-based method that utilizes calibrated confidence scores for a 2-stage inference pipeline. Our method outperforms the baseline model on the Cholec80 dataset, and can be applied to a variety of action segmentation methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-14T22:55:31Z)
• LRTD: Long-Range Temporal Dependency based Active Learning for Surgical Workflow Recognition [67.86810761677403]
  We propose a novel active learning method for cost-effective surgical video analysis. Specifically, we propose a non-local recurrent convolutional network (NL-RCNet), which introduces non-local block to capture the long-range temporal dependency. We validate our approach on a large surgical video dataset (Cholec80) by performing surgical workflow recognition task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-21T09:21:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.