Facial Expression Recognition with YOLOv11 and YOLOv12: A Comparative Study

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.10940v1
• Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 03:57:21 GMT
• Title: Facial Expression Recognition with YOLOv11 and YOLOv12: A Comparative Study
• Authors: Umma Aymon, Nur Shazwani Kamarudin, Ahmad Fakhri Ab. Nasir,
• Abstract summary: This study investigates the performance of two lightweight models, YOLOv11n and YOLOv12n, within a unified detection and classification framework for FER.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
• Abstract: Facial Expression Recognition remains a challenging task, especially in unconstrained, real-world environments. This study investigates the performance of two lightweight models, YOLOv11n and YOLOv12n, which are the nano variants of the latest official YOLO series, within a unified detection and classification framework for FER. Two benchmark classification datasets, FER2013 and KDEF, are converted into object detection format and model performance is evaluated using mAP 0.5, precision, recall, and confusion matrices. Results show that YOLOv12n achieves the highest overall performance on the clean KDEF dataset with a mAP 0.5 of 95.6, and also outperforms YOLOv11n on the FER2013 dataset in terms of mAP 63.8, reflecting stronger sensitivity to varied expressions. In contrast, YOLOv11n demonstrates higher precision 65.2 on FER2013, indicating fewer false positives and better reliability in noisy, real-world conditions. On FER2013, both models show more confusion between visually similar expressions, while clearer class separation is observed on the cleaner KDEF dataset. These findings underscore the trade-off between sensitivity and precision, illustrating how lightweight YOLO models can effectively balance performance and efficiency. The results demonstrate adaptability across both controlled and real-world conditions, establishing these models as strong candidates for real-time, resource-constrained emotion-aware AI applications.

Related papers

• YOLO-DS: Fine-Grained Feature Decoupling via Dual-Statistic Synergy Operator for Object Detection [55.58092342624062]
  We propose YOLO-DS, a framework built around a novel Dual-Statistic Synergy Operator (DSO)<n>YOLO-DS decouples object features by jointly modeling the channel-wise mean and the peak-to-mean difference.<n>On the MS-COCO benchmark, YOLO-DS consistently outperforms YOLOv8 across five model scales.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-26T05:50:32Z)
• Vision-Based Driver Drowsiness Monitoring: Comparative Analysis of YOLOv5-v11 Models [0.0]
  Driver drowsiness remains a critical factor in road accidents, accounting for thousands of fatalities and injuries each year.<n>This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of real-time, non-intrusive drowsiness detection methods, focusing on computer vision based YOLO algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-22T08:30:02Z)
• RoHOI: Robustness Benchmark for Human-Object Interaction Detection [84.78366452133514]
  Human-Object Interaction (HOI) detection is crucial for robot-human assistance, enabling context-aware support.<n>We introduce the first benchmark for HOI detection, evaluating model resilience under diverse challenges.<n>Our benchmark, RoHOI, includes 20 corruption types based on the HICO-DET and V-COCO datasets and a new robustness-focused metric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-12T01:58:04Z)
• YOLOv13: Real-Time Object Detection with Hypergraph-Enhanced Adaptive Visual Perception [58.06752127687312]
  We propose YOLOv13, an accurate and lightweight object detector.<n>We propose a Hypergraph-based Adaptive Correlation Enhancement (HyperACE) mechanism.<n>We also propose a Full-Pipeline Aggregation-and-Distribution (FullPAD) paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-21T15:15:03Z)
• RF-DETR Object Detection vs YOLOv12 : A Study of Transformer-based and CNN-based Architectures for Single-Class and Multi-Class Greenfruit Detection in Complex Orchard Environments Under Label Ambiguity [0.8488322025656239]
  This study conducts a detailed comparison of RF-DETR object detection base model and YOLOv12 object detection model configurations.<n>A custom dataset was developed featuring both single-class (greenfruit) and multi-class (occluded and non-occluded greenfruits) annotations.<n>RF-DETR model, utilizing a DINOv2 backbone and deformable attention, excelled in global context modeling.<n>YOLOv12 leveraged CNN-based attention for enhanced local feature extraction, optimizing it for computational efficiency and edge deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-17T17:08:11Z)
• Robust Fine-tuning of Zero-shot Models via Variance Reduction [56.360865951192324]
  When fine-tuning zero-shot models, our desideratum is for the fine-tuned model to excel in both in-distribution (ID) and out-of-distribution (OOD) We propose a sample-wise ensembling technique that can simultaneously attain the best ID and OOD accuracy without the trade-offs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-11T13:13:39Z)
• YOLO Evolution: A Comprehensive Benchmark and Architectural Review of YOLOv12, YOLO11, and Their Previous Versions [0.0]
  This study represents the first comprehensive experimental evaluation of YOLOv3 to the latest version, YOLOv12.<n>The challenges considered include varying object sizes, diverse aspect ratios, and small-sized objects of a single class.<n>Our analysis highlights the distinctive strengths and limitations of each YOLO version.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T20:45:00Z)
• Fluid: Scaling Autoregressive Text-to-image Generative Models with Continuous Tokens [53.99177152562075]
  Scaling up autoregressive models in vision has not proven as beneficial as in large language models. We focus on two critical factors: whether models use discrete or continuous tokens, and whether tokens are generated in a random or fixed order using BERT- or GPT-like transformer architectures. Our results show that while all models scale effectively in terms of validation loss, their evaluation performance -- measured by FID, GenEval score, and visual quality -- follows different trends.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T17:59:59Z)
• Fall Detection for Industrial Setups Using YOLOv8 Variants [0.0]
  The YOLOv8m model, consisting of 25.9 million parameters and 79.1 GFLOPs, demonstrated a respectable balance between computational efficiency and detection performance. Although the YOLOv8l and YOLOv8x models presented higher precision and recall, their higher computational demands and model size make them less suitable for resource-constrained environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-08T17:24:54Z)
• YOLOv10: Real-Time End-to-End Object Detection [68.28699631793967]
  YOLOs have emerged as the predominant paradigm in the field of real-time object detection. The reliance on the non-maximum suppression (NMS) for post-processing hampers the end-to-end deployment of YOLOs. We introduce the holistic efficiency-accuracy driven model design strategy for YOLOs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T11:44:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.