GroupRank: A Groupwise Reranking Paradigm Driven by Reinforcement Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.11653v1
• Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 15:25:31 GMT
• Title: GroupRank: A Groupwise Reranking Paradigm Driven by Reinforcement Learning
• Authors: Duolin Sun, Meixiu Long, Dan Yang, Yihan Jiao, Zhehao Tan, Jie Feng, Junjie Wang, Yue Shen, Peng Wei, Jian Wang, Jinjie Gu,
• Abstract summary: Groupwise is a novel reranking paradigm for large language models.<n>We propose an innovative pipeline for high quality retrieval and ranking data.<n>The resulting data can be leveraged not only for training the reranker but also for training the retriever.
• Score: 26.616849067985967
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models have shown strong potential as rerankers to enhance the overall performance of RAG systems. However, existing reranking paradigms are constrained by a core theoretical and practical dilemma: Pointwise methods, while simple and highly flexible, evaluate documents independently, making them prone to the Ranking Myopia Trap, overlooking the relative importance between documents. In contrast, Listwise methods can perceive the global ranking context, but suffer from inherent List Rigidity, leading to severe scalability and flexibility issues when handling large candidate sets. To address these challenges, we propose Groupwise, a novel reranking paradigm. In this approach, the query and a group of candidate documents are jointly fed into the model, which performs within-group comparisons to assign individual relevance scores to each document. This design retains the flexibility of Pointwise methods while enabling the comparative capability of Listwise methods. We further adopt GRPO for model training, equipped with a heterogeneous reward function that integrates ranking metrics with a distributional reward aimed at aligning score distributions across groups. To overcome the bottleneck caused by the scarcity of high quality labeled data, we further propose an innovative pipeline for synthesizing high quality retrieval and ranking data. The resulting data can be leveraged not only for training the reranker but also for training the retriever. Extensive experiments validate the effectiveness of our approach. On two reasoning intensive retrieval benchmarks, BRIGHT and R2MED.

Related papers

• From Absolute to Relative: Rethinking Reward Shaping in Group-Based Reinforcement Learning [7.6602542594279335]
  We propose Reinforcement Learning with Relative Rewards to shift reward shaping from absolute scoring to relative ranking.<n>We show that RLRR yields consistent performance improvements over standard group-based baselines across reasoning benchmarks and open-ended generation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-30T15:07:06Z)
• ArenaRL: Scaling RL for Open-Ended Agents via Tournament-based Relative Ranking [84.07076200941474]
  ArenaRL is a reinforcement learning paradigm that shifts from pointwise scalar scoring to intra-group relative ranking.<n>We construct an intra-group adversarial arena and devise a tournament-based ranking scheme to obtain stable advantage signals.<n>Experiments show that ArenaRL substantially outperforms standard RL baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-10T08:43:07Z)
• Repurposing Synthetic Data for Fine-grained Search Agent Supervision [81.95597592711688]
  LLM-based search agents are increasingly trained on entity-centric synthetic data.<n> prevailing training methods discard this rich entity information, relying instead on sparse, outcome-based rewards.<n>We introduce Entity-aware Group Relative Policy Optimization (E-GRPO), a novel framework that formulates a dense entity-aware reward function.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-28T17:50:40Z)
• ERank: Fusing Supervised Fine-Tuning and Reinforcement Learning for Effective and Efficient Text Reranking [33.25740773392183]
  ERank is a highly effective and efficient pointwise reranker built from a reasoning LLM that excels across diverse relevance scenarios.<n>We propose a novel two-stage training pipeline that begins with Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT)<n>In this stage, we move beyond binary labels and train the model generatively to output fine grained integer scores, which significantly enhances relevance discrimination.<n>We evaluate the ERank reranker on the BRIGHT, FollowIR, TREC DL, and BEIR benchmarks, demonstrating superior effectiveness and robustness compared to existing approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-30T14:56:53Z)
• DACL-RAG: Data Augmentation Strategy with Curriculum Learning for Retrieval-Augmented Generation [54.26665681604041]
  We introduce DACL-RAG, a multi-stage RAG training framework that combines a multi-level Data Augmentation strategy and a multi-stage Curriculum Learning paradigm.<n>Our framework demonstrates consistent effectiveness across four open-domain QA datasets, achieving performance gains of 2% to 4% over multiple advanced methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-15T16:53:04Z)
• Lightweight and Direct Document Relevance Optimization for Generative Information Retrieval [49.669503570350166]
  Generative information retrieval (GenIR) is a promising neural retrieval paradigm that formulates document retrieval as a document identifier (docid) generation task.<n>Existing GenIR models suffer from token-level misalignment, where models trained to predict the next token often fail to capture document-level relevance effectively.<n>We propose direct document relevance optimization (DDRO), which aligns token-level docid generation with document-level relevance estimation through direct optimization via pairwise ranking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T15:27:37Z)
• Enhancing Retrieval Performance: An Ensemble Approach For Hard Negative Mining [0.0]
  This study focuses on explaining the crucial role of hard negatives in the training process of cross-encoder models. We have developed a robust hard negative mining technique for efficient training of cross-encoder re-rank models on an enterprise dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T05:23:39Z)
• LIRE: listwise reward enhancement for preference alignment [27.50204023448716]
  We propose a gradient-based reward optimization approach that incorporates the offline rewards of multiple responses into a streamlined listwise framework. LIRE is straightforward to implement, requiring minimal parameter tuning, and seamlessly aligns with the pairwise paradigm. Our experiments demonstrate that LIRE consistently outperforms existing methods across several benchmarks on dialogue and summarization tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-22T10:21:50Z)
• Modeling the Q-Diversity in a Min-max Play Game for Robust Optimization [61.39201891894024]
  Group distributionally robust optimization (group DRO) can minimize the worst-case loss over pre-defined groups. We reformulate the group DRO framework by proposing Q-Diversity. Characterized by an interactive training mode, Q-Diversity relaxes the group identification from annotation into direct parameterization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-20T07:02:27Z)
• Ranking & Reweighting Improves Group Distributional Robustness [14.021069321266516]
  We propose a ranking-based training method called Discounted Rank Upweighting (DRU) to learn models that exhibit strong OOD performance on the test data. Results on several synthetic and real-world datasets highlight the superior ability of our group-ranking-based (akin to soft-minimax) approach in selecting and learning models that are robust to group distributional shifts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-09T20:37:16Z)
• Take One Gram of Neural Features, Get Enhanced Group Robustness [23.541213868620837]
  Predictive performance of machine learning models trained with empirical risk minimization can degrade considerably under distribution shifts. We propose to partition the training dataset into groups based on Gram matrices of features extracted by an identification'' model. Our approach not only improves group robustness over ERM but also outperforms all recent baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-26T12:34:55Z)
• Towards Model-Agnostic Post-Hoc Adjustment for Balancing Ranking Fairness and Algorithm Utility [54.179859639868646]
  Bipartite ranking aims to learn a scoring function that ranks positive individuals higher than negative ones from labeled data. There have been rising concerns on whether the learned scoring function can cause systematic disparity across different protected groups. We propose a model post-processing framework for balancing them in the bipartite ranking scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-15T10:08:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.