MAVIS: A Benchmark for Multimodal Source Attribution in Long-form Visual Question Answering

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.12142v1
• Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2025 10:14:59 GMT
• Title: MAVIS: A Benchmark for Multimodal Source Attribution in Long-form Visual Question Answering
• Authors: Seokwon Song, Minsu Park, Gunhee Kim,
• Abstract summary: We introduce MAVIS, the first benchmark designed to evaluate multimodal source attribution systems.<n>Our dataset comprises 157K visual QA instances, where each answer is annotated with fact-level citations referring to multimodal documents.<n>We develop fine-grained automatic metrics along three dimensions of informativeness, groundedness, and fluency, and demonstrate their strong correlation with human judgments.
• Score: 44.41273615523289
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Source attribution aims to enhance the reliability of AI-generated answers by including references for each statement, helping users validate the provided answers. However, existing work has primarily focused on text-only scenario and largely overlooked the role of multimodality. We introduce MAVIS, the first benchmark designed to evaluate multimodal source attribution systems that understand user intent behind visual questions, retrieve multimodal evidence, and generate long-form answers with citations. Our dataset comprises 157K visual QA instances, where each answer is annotated with fact-level citations referring to multimodal documents. We develop fine-grained automatic metrics along three dimensions of informativeness, groundedness, and fluency, and demonstrate their strong correlation with human judgments. Our key findings are threefold: (1) LVLMs with multimodal RAG generate more informative and fluent answers than unimodal RAG, but they exhibit weaker groundedness for image documents than for text documents, a gap amplified in multimodal settings. (2) Given the same multimodal documents, there is a trade-off between informativeness and groundedness across different prompting methods. (3) Our proposed method highlights mitigating contextual bias in interpreting image documents as a crucial direction for future research. The dataset and experimental code are available at https://github.com/seokwon99/MAVIS

Related papers

• UNIDOC-BENCH: A Unified Benchmark for Document-Centric Multimodal RAG [82.84014669683863]
  Multimodal retrieval-augmented generation (MM-RAG) is a key approach for applying large language models to real-world knowledge bases.<n>UniDoc-Bench is the first large-scale, realistic benchmark for MM-RAG built from 70k real-world PDF pages.<n>Our experiments show that multimodal text-image fusion RAG systems consistently outperform both unimodal and jointly multimodal embedding-based retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-04T04:30:13Z)
• Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Multimodal Generation for Document Question Answering [60.062194349648195]
  Document Visual Question Answering (DocVQA) faces dual challenges in processing lengthy multimodal documents.<n>Current document retrieval-augmented generation (DocRAG) methods remain limited by their text-centric approaches.<n>We introduce MMDocRAG, a comprehensive benchmark featuring 4,055 expert-annotated QA pairs with multi-page, cross-modal evidence chains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T09:52:57Z)
• Benchmarking Retrieval-Augmented Generation in Multi-Modal Contexts [56.7225771305861]
  This paper introduces Multi-Modal Retrieval-Augmented Generation (M$2$RAG), a benchmark designed to evaluate the effectiveness of Multi-modal Large Language Models.<n>The benchmark comprises four tasks: image captioning, multi-modal question answering, multi-modal fact verification, and image reranking.<n>To enhance the context utilization capabilities of MLLMs, we also introduce Multi-Modal Retrieval-Augmented Instruction Tuning (MM-RAIT)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-24T16:25:25Z)
• VisDoM: Multi-Document QA with Visually Rich Elements Using Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation [100.06122876025063]
  This paper introduces VisDoMBench, the first comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate QA systems in multi-document settings.<n>We propose VisDoMRAG, a novel multimodal Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) approach that simultaneously utilizes visual and textual RAG.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-14T06:24:55Z)
• MIRe: Enhancing Multimodal Queries Representation via Fusion-Free Modality Interaction for Multimodal Retrieval [26.585985828583304]
  We introduce MIRe, a retrieval framework that achieves modality interaction without fusing textual features during the alignment.<n>Our method allows the textual query to attend to visual embeddings while not feeding text-driven signals back into the visual representations.<n>Our experiments demonstrate that our pre-training strategy significantly enhances the understanding of multimodal queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-13T04:32:58Z)
• M3DocRAG: Multi-modal Retrieval is What You Need for Multi-page Multi-document Understanding [63.33447665725129]
  We introduce M3DocRAG, a novel multi-modal RAG framework that flexibly accommodates various document contexts. M3DocRAG can efficiently handle single or many documents while preserving visual information. We also present M3DocVQA, a new benchmark for evaluating open-domain DocVQA over 3,000+ PDF documents with 40,000+ pages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-07T18:29:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.