OmniGround: A Comprehensive Spatio-Temporal Grounding Benchmark for Real-World Complex Scenarios

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.16937v1
• Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 04:23:04 GMT
• Title: OmniGround: A Comprehensive Spatio-Temporal Grounding Benchmark for Real-World Complex Scenarios
• Authors: Hong Gao, Jingyu Wu, Xiangkai Xu, Kangni Xie, Yunchen Zhang, Bin Zhong, Xurui Gao, Min-Ling Zhang,
• Abstract summary: We introduce OmniGround, a comprehensive benchmark with 3,475 videos spanning 81 categories and complex real-world queries.<n>We also introduce DeepSTG, a systematic evaluation framework quantifying dataset quality across four complementary dimensions.<n>Experiments demonstrate PG-TAF achieves 25.6% and 35.6% improvements in m_tIoU and m_vIoU with consistent gains across four benchmarks.
• Score: 39.58602686069029
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Spatio-Temporal Video Grounding (STVG) aims to localize target objects in videos based on natural language descriptions. Despite recent advances in Multimodal Large Language Models, a significant gap remains between current models and real-world demands involving diverse objects and complex queries. We attribute this to limited benchmark scope, causing models to exhibit category bias, oversimplified reasoning, and poor linguistic robustness. To address these limitations, we introduce OmniGround, a comprehensive benchmark with 3,475 videos spanning 81 categories and complex real-world queries. We propose the Forward-Backward-Refinement annotation pipeline that combines multi-directional tracking with intelligent error correction for high-quality labels. We further introduce DeepSTG, a systematic evaluation framework quantifying dataset quality across four complementary dimensions beyond superficial statistics. Evaluations reveal performance average drop of 10.4% on complex real-world scenes, particularly with small/occluded objects and intricate spatial relations. Motivated by these, we propose PG-TAF, a training-free two-stage framework decomposing STVG into high-level temporal grounding and fine-grained spatio-temporal propagation. Experiments demonstrate PG-TAF achieves 25.6% and 35.6% improvements in m\_tIoU and m\_vIoU on OmniGround with consistent gains across four benchmarks.

Related papers

• STVG-R1: Incentivizing Instance-Level Reasoning and Grounding in Videos via Reinforcement Learning [65.36458157092207]
  In vision-language models (VLMs), misalignment between textual descriptions and visual coordinates often induces hallucinations.<n>We propose a novel visual prompting paradigm that avoids the difficult problem of aligning coordinates across modalities.<n>We introduce STVG-R1, the first reinforcement learning framework for STVG, which employs a task-driven reward to jointly optimize temporal accuracy, spatial consistency, and structural format regularization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-12T08:53:32Z)
• RISE-Video: Can Video Generators Decode Implicit World Rules? [71.92434352963427]
  We present RISE-Video, a pioneering reasoning-oriented benchmark for Text-Image-to-Video (TI2V) synthesis.<n>RISE-Video comprises 467 meticulously human-annotated samples spanning eight rigorous categories.<n>We propose an automated pipeline leveraging Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) to emulate human-centric assessment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-05T18:36:10Z)
• From Indoor to Open World: Revealing the Spatial Reasoning Gap in MLLMs [65.04549036809557]
  We introduce a benchmark built from pedestrian-perspective videos captured with synchronized stereo cameras, LiDAR, and IMU/GPS sensors.<n>This dataset provides metrically precise 3D information, enabling the automatic generation of spatial reasoning questions.<n> Evaluations reveal that the performance gains observed in structured indoor benchmarks vanish in open-world settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-22T18:58:12Z)
• GroundingME: Exposing the Visual Grounding Gap in MLLMs through Multi-Dimensional Evaluation [40.999498663740454]
  multimodal large language models (MLLMs) achieve impressive scores on existing benchmarks.<n>GroundingME systematically challenges models across four critical dimensions.<n> evaluating 25 state-of-the-art MLLMs reveals a profound capability gap.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-19T12:06:25Z)
• Prompt-Guided Spatial Understanding with RGB-D Transformers for Fine-Grained Object Relation Reasoning [7.670666668651702]
  We introduce a dedicated spatial reasoning framework for the Physical AI Spatial Intelligence Warehouse dataset introduced in the Track 3 2025 AI City Challenge.<n>Our approach enhances spatial comprehension by embedding mask dimensions in the form of bounding box coordinates directly into the input prompts.<n>Our comprehensive pipeline achieves a final score of 73.0606, placing 4th overall on the public leaderboard.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T22:51:20Z)
• Remote Sensing-Oriented World Model [14.021235530589246]
  World models have shown potential in artificial intelligence by predicting and reasoning about world states beyond direct observations.<n>Existing approaches are predominantly evaluated in synthetic environments or constrained scene settings.<n>This paper bridges these gaps by introducing the first framework for world modeling in remote sensing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-22T14:02:39Z)
• GEOBench-VLM: Benchmarking Vision-Language Models for Geospatial Tasks [84.86699025256705]
  We present GEOBench-VLM, a benchmark specifically designed to evaluate Vision-Language Models (VLMs) on geospatial tasks.<n>Our benchmark features over 10,000 manually verified instructions and spanning diverse visual conditions, object types, and scales.<n>We evaluate several state-of-the-art VLMs to assess performance on geospatial-specific challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-28T18:59:56Z)
• SURDS: Benchmarking Spatial Understanding and Reasoning in Driving Scenarios with Vision Language Models [15.50826328938879]
  We introduce SURDS, a benchmark designed to evaluate the spatial reasoning capabilities of vision language models (VLMs)<n>Built on the nuScenes dataset, SURDS comprises 41,080 vision-question-answer training instances and 9,250 evaluation samples.<n>We propose a reinforcement learning-based alignment scheme leveraging spatially grounded reward signals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-20T08:14:01Z)
• MMScan: A Multi-Modal 3D Scene Dataset with Hierarchical Grounded Language Annotations [55.022519020409405]
  This paper builds the first largest ever multi-modal 3D scene dataset and benchmark with hierarchical grounded language annotations, MMScan.<n>The resulting multi-modal 3D dataset encompasses 1.4M meta-annotated captions on 109k objects and 7.7k regions as well as over 3.04M diverse samples for 3D visual grounding and question-answering benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T17:59:30Z)
• Coupling Global Context and Local Contents for Weakly-Supervised Semantic Segmentation [54.419401869108846]
  We propose a single-stage WeaklySupervised Semantic (WSSS) model with only the image-level class label supervisions. A flexible context aggregation module is proposed to capture the global object context in different granular spaces. A semantically consistent feature fusion module is proposed in a bottom-up parameter-learnable fashion to aggregate the fine-grained local contents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-18T15:29:23Z)
• Benchmarking Unsupervised Object Representations for Video Sequences [111.81492107649889]
  We compare the perceptual abilities of four object-centric approaches: ViMON, OP3, TBA and SCALOR. Our results suggest that the architectures with unconstrained latent representations learn more powerful representations in terms of object detection, segmentation and tracking. Our benchmark may provide fruitful guidance towards learning more robust object-centric video representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-12T09:37:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.