Toward Sustainable Generative AI: A Scoping Review of Carbon Footprint and Environmental Impacts Across Training and Inference Stages

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.17179v1
• Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 11:59:34 GMT
• Title: Toward Sustainable Generative AI: A Scoping Review of Carbon Footprint and Environmental Impacts Across Training and Inference Stages
• Authors: Min-Kyu Kim, Tae-An Yoo, Ji-Bum Chung,
• Abstract summary: Generative AI is spreading rapidly, creating significant social and economic value.<n>The cumulative environmental footprint generated during large-scale service operations has received comparatively less attention.<n>This study conducts a scoping review of methodologies and research trends in AI carbon footprint assessment.
• Score: 2.2758077237273846
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Generative AI is spreading rapidly, creating significant social and economic value while also raising concerns about its high energy use and environmental sustainability. While prior studies have predominantly focused on the energy-intensive nature of the training phase, the cumulative environmental footprint generated during large-scale service operations, particularly in the inference phase, has received comparatively less attention. To bridge this gap this study conducts a scoping review of methodologies and research trends in AI carbon footprint assessment. We analyze the classification and standardization status of existing AI carbon measurement tools and methodologies, and comparatively examine the environmental impacts arising from both training and inference stages. In addition, we identify how multidimensional factors such as model size, prompt complexity, serving environments, and system boundary definitions shape the resulting carbon footprint. Our review reveals critical limitations in current AI carbon accounting practices, including methodological inconsistencies, technology-specific biases, and insufficient attention to end-to-end system perspectives. Building on these insights, we propose future research and governance directions: (1) establishing standardized and transparent universal measurement protocols, (2) designing dynamic evaluation frameworks that incorporate user behavior, (3) developing life-cycle monitoring systems that encompass embodied emissions, and (4) advancing multidimensional sustainability assessment framework that balance model performance with environmental efficiency. This paper provides a foundation for interdisciplinary dialogue aimed at building a sustainable AI ecosystem and offers a baseline guideline for researchers seeking to understand the environmental implications of AI across technical, social, and operational dimensions.

Related papers

• AI-CARE: Carbon-Aware Reporting Evaluation Metric for AI Models [2.7946918847372277]
  We propose AI-CARE, an evaluation tool for reporting energy consumption, and carbon emissions of machine learning models.<n>We demonstrate, through theoretical analysis and empirical validation, that carbon-aware benchmarking changes the relative ranking of models.<n>Our proposal aims to shift the research community toward transparent, multi-objective evaluation and align ML progress with global sustainability goals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-17T21:52:48Z)
• The Hidden AI Race: Tracking Environmental Costs of Innovation [2.5782420501870296]
  We study the amount of carbon dioxide released by models across different domains over varying time periods.<n>Our findings reveal that model size and versioning frequency are strongly correlated with higher emissions.<n>University-driven projects exhibit the highest emissions, followed by non-profits and companies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-27T22:14:43Z)
• Insights Informed Generative AI for Design: Incorporating Real-world Data for Text-to-Image Output [51.88841610098437]
  We propose a novel pipeline that integrates DALL-E 3 with a materials dataset to enrich AI-generated designs with sustainability metrics and material usage insights.<n>We evaluate the system through three user tests: (1) no mention of sustainability to the user prior to the prompting process with generative AI, (2) sustainability goals communicated to the user before prompting, and (3) sustainability goals communicated along with quantitative CO2e data included in the generative AI outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-17T22:33:11Z)
• Calculating Software's Energy Use and Carbon Emissions: A Survey of the State of Art, Challenges, and the Way Ahead [8.377809633825196]
  The proliferation of software and AI comes with a hidden risk: its growing energy and carbon footprint.<n>We present a state-of-the-art review of methods and tools that enable the measurement of software and AI-related energy and/or carbon emissions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-11T13:02:00Z)
• Greening AI-enabled Systems with Software Engineering: A Research Agenda for Environmentally Sustainable AI Practices [70.24403396375277]
  The "Greening AI with Software Engineering" CECAM-Lorentz workshop was held February 3-7, 2025 in Lausanne, Switzerland.<n>This report presents a research agenda emerging from the workshop.<n>It outlines open research directions and practical recommendations to guide the development of environmentally sustainable AI-enabled systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-02T15:19:49Z)
• Bridging the Gap: Integrating Ethics and Environmental Sustainability in AI Research and Practice [57.94036023167952]
  We argue that the efforts aiming to study AI's ethical ramifications should be made in tandem with those evaluating its impacts on the environment.<n>We propose best practices to better integrate AI ethics and sustainability in AI research and practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-01T13:53:11Z)
• Environmental large language model Evaluation (ELLE) dataset: A Benchmark for Evaluating Generative AI applications in Eco-environment Domain [6.246205449407889]
  Generative AI holds significant potential for ecological and environmental applications.<n>The Environmental Large Language model Evaluation (ELLE) dataset is the first benchmark designed to assess large language models.<n>ELLE dataset includes 1,130 question answer pairs across 16 environmental topics, categorized by domain, difficulty, and type.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-10T12:48:29Z)
• FREE: The Foundational Semantic Recognition for Modeling Environmental Ecosystems [56.0640340392818]
  We introduce a framework, FREE, that enables the use of varying features and available information to train a universal model.<n>The core idea is to map available environmental data into a text space and then convert the traditional predictive modeling task in environmental science to a semantic recognition problem.<n>Our evaluation on two societally important real-world applications, stream water temperature prediction and crop yield prediction, demonstrates the superiority of FREE over multiple baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-17T00:53:09Z)
• Predictable Artificial Intelligence [77.1127726638209]
  This paper introduces the ideas and challenges of Predictable AI.<n>It explores the ways in which we can anticipate key validity indicators of present and future AI ecosystems.<n>We argue that achieving predictability is crucial for fostering trust, liability, control, alignment and safety of AI ecosystems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-09T21:36:21Z)
• Towards Sustainable Development: A Novel Integrated Machine Learning Model for Holistic Environmental Health Monitoring [0.0]
  Urbanization enables economic growth but also harms the environment through degradation. Machine learning has emerged as a promising tool for tracking environmental deterioration by identifying key predictive features. This research aims to assist governments in identifying intervention points, improving planning and conservation efforts, and ultimately contributing to sustainable development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-20T16:35:21Z)
• A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Algorithms for Anomaly Detection in Industrial Environments: Performance and Environmental Impact [62.997667081978825]
  This study seeks to address the demands of high-performance machine learning models with environmental sustainability. Traditional machine learning algorithms, such as Decision Trees and Random Forests, demonstrate robust efficiency and performance. However, superior outcomes were obtained with optimised configurations, albeit with a commensurate increase in resource consumption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-01T15:18:00Z)
• Sustainable AI: Environmental Implications, Challenges and Opportunities [13.089123643565724]
  We characterize the carbon footprint of AI computing by examining the model development cycle across industry-scale machine learning use cases. We present an end-to-end analysis for what and how hardware-software design and at-scale optimization can help reduce the overall carbon footprint of AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-30T23:36:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.