Comparative Analysis of Large Language Model Inference Serving Systems: A Performance Study of vLLM and HuggingFace TGI

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.17593v1
• Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 16:25:21 GMT
• Title: Comparative Analysis of Large Language Model Inference Serving Systems: A Performance Study of vLLM and HuggingFace TGI
• Authors: Saicharan Kolluru,
• Abstract summary: This paper presents a comprehensive empirical evaluation of two prominent open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) serving frameworks: vLLM and HuggingFace Text Generation Inference (TGI)<n>We benchmark these systems across multiple dimensions including throughput performance, end-to-end latency, GPU memory utilization, and scalability characteristics using LLaMA-2 models ranging from 7B to 70B parameters.<n>Our experiments reveal that vLLM achieves up to 24x higher throughput than TGI under high-concurrency workloads through its novel PagedAttention mechanism, while TGI demonstrates lower tail latencies for interactive single-user scenarios.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) in production environments requires efficient inference serving systems that balance throughput, latency, and resource utilization. This paper presents a comprehensive empirical evaluation of two prominent open-source LLM serving frameworks: vLLM and HuggingFace Text Generation Inference (TGI). We benchmark these systems across multiple dimensions including throughput performance, end-to-end latency, GPU memory utilization, and scalability characteristics using LLaMA-2 models ranging from 7B to 70B parameters. Our experiments reveal that vLLM achieves up to 24x higher throughput than TGI under high-concurrency workloads through its novel PagedAttention mechanism, while TGI demonstrates lower tail latencies for interactive single-user scenarios. We provide detailed performance profiles for different deployment scenarios and offer practical recommendations for system selection based on workload characteristics. Our findings indicate that the choice between these frameworks should be guided by specific use-case requirements: vLLM excels in high-throughput batch processing scenarios, while TGI is better suited for latency-sensitive interactive applications with moderate concurrency.

Related papers

• Rethinking Agentic Workflows: Evaluating Inference-Based Test-Time Scaling Strategies in Text2SQL Tasks [21.891522433628893]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly powering Text-to- (Text2) systems, enabling non-expert users to query industrial databases using natural language.<n>While test-time scaling strategies have shown promise in LLM-based solutions, their effectiveness in real-world applications, especially with the latest reasoning models, remains uncertain.<n>This work sheds light on the practical trade-offs between accuracy, efficiency, and complexity when deploying Text2 systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T01:29:54Z)
• Leveraging Generative Models for Real-Time Query-Driven Text Summarization in Large-Scale Web Search [54.987957691350665]
  Query-Driven Text Summarization (QDTS) aims to generate concise and informative summaries from textual documents based on a given query.<n>Traditional extractive summarization models, based primarily on ranking candidate summary segments, have been the dominant approach in industrial applications.<n>We propose a novel framework to pioneer the application of generative models to address real-time QDTS in industrial web search.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-28T08:51:51Z)
• Scalable Engine and the Performance of Different LLM Models in a SLURM based HPC architecture [3.746889836344766]
  This work elaborates on a High performance computing architecture based on Simple Linux Utility for Resource Management (SLURM)<n> Dynamic resource scheduling and seamless integration of containerized have been leveraged to manage CPU, GPU, and memory efficiently in multi-node clusters.<n>The obtained results pave ways for significantly more efficient, responsive, and fault-tolerant LLM inference on large-scale HPC infrastructures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-25T09:11:27Z)
• Pangu Embedded: An Efficient Dual-system LLM Reasoner with Metacognition [95.54406667705999]
  Pangu Embedded is an efficient Large Language Model (LLM) reasoner developed on Ascend Neural Processing Units (NPUs)<n>It addresses the significant computational costs and inference latency challenges prevalent in existing reasoning-optimized LLMs.<n>It delivers rapid responses and state-of-the-art reasoning quality within a single, unified model architecture.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-28T14:03:02Z)
• Iris: Breaking GUI Complexity with Adaptive Focus and Self-Refining [67.87810796668981]
  Information-Sensitive Cropping (ISC) and Self-Refining Dual Learning (SRDL)<n>Iris achieves state-of-the-art performance across multiple benchmarks with only 850K GUI annotations.<n>These improvements translate to significant gains in both web and OS agent downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-13T18:40:10Z)
• GUIDE: A Global Unified Inference Engine for Deploying Large Language Models in Heterogeneous Environments [1.0558515062670693]
  Large language models (LLMs) in real-world scenarios remains a critical challenge.<n>These challenges often lead to inefficiencies in memory utilization, latency, and throughput.<n>We develop a framework to address these issues, achieving prediction errors between 9.9% and 42.3% for key metrics such as batch latency, TTFT, and decode throughput.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T05:46:43Z)
• Reference Trustable Decoding: A Training-Free Augmentation Paradigm for Large Language Models [79.41139393080736]
  Large language models (LLMs) have rapidly advanced and demonstrated impressive capabilities. In-Context Learning (ICL) and. Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) are currently two mainstream methods for augmenting. LLMs to downstream tasks. We propose Reference Trustable Decoding (RTD), a paradigm that allows models to quickly adapt to new tasks without fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-30T10:48:20Z)
• The Impact of Hyperparameters on Large Language Model Inference Performance: An Evaluation of vLLM and HuggingFace Pipelines [6.381783966294295]
  Open-source large language models (LLMs) enable developers to create AI-based solutions while maintaining control over aspects such as privacy and compliance. We analyze the performance, particularly the throughput (tokens generated per unit of time) of 20 LLMs using two inference libraries: vLLM and HuggingFace's pipelines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-02T06:56:59Z)
• Performance Tuning for GPU-Embedded Systems: Machine-Learning-based and Analytical Model-driven Tuning Methodologies [0.0]
  The study introduces an analytical model-driven tuning methodology and a Machine Learning (ML)-based tuning methodology. We evaluate the performance of the two tuning methodologies for different parallel prefix implementations of the BPLG library in an NVIDIA Jetson system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T22:09:03Z)
• Energy-efficient Task Adaptation for NLP Edge Inference Leveraging Heterogeneous Memory Architectures [68.91874045918112]
  adapter-ALBERT is an efficient model optimization for maximal data reuse across different tasks. We demonstrate the advantage of mapping the model to a heterogeneous on-chip memory architecture by performing simulations on a validated NLP edge accelerator.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-25T14:40:59Z)
• SOLIS -- The MLOps journey from data acquisition to actionable insights [62.997667081978825]
  In this paper we present a unified deployment pipeline and freedom-to-operate approach that supports all requirements while using basic cross-platform tensor framework and script language engines. This approach however does not supply the needed procedures and pipelines for the actual deployment of machine learning capabilities in real production grade systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-22T14:45:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.