RubricRL: Simple Generalizable Rewards for Text-to-Image Generation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.20651v1
• Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 18:59:55 GMT
• Title: RubricRL: Simple Generalizable Rewards for Text-to-Image Generation
• Authors: Xuelu Feng, Yunsheng Li, Ziyu Wan, Zixuan Gao, Junsong Yuan, Dongdong Chen, Chunming Qiao,
• Abstract summary: Reinforcement learning (RL) has recently emerged as a promising approach for aligning text-to-image generative models with human preferences.<n>Existing methods often rely on either composite metrics (e.g., CLIP, OCR, and realism scores) with fixed weights or a single scalar reward distilled from human preference models.<n>We proposeRL, a simple and general framework for rubric-based reward design that offers greater interpretability, rubricsability, and user control.
• Score: 48.51955133988087
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) has recently emerged as a promising approach for aligning text-to-image generative models with human preferences. A key challenge, however, lies in designing effective and interpretable rewards. Existing methods often rely on either composite metrics (e.g., CLIP, OCR, and realism scores) with fixed weights or a single scalar reward distilled from human preference models, which can limit interpretability and flexibility. We propose RubricRL, a simple and general framework for rubric-based reward design that offers greater interpretability, composability, and user control. Instead of using a black-box scalar signal, RubricRL dynamically constructs a structured rubric for each prompt--a decomposable checklist of fine-grained visual criteria such as object correctness, attribute accuracy, OCR fidelity, and realism--tailored to the input text. Each criterion is independently evaluated by a multimodal judge (e.g., o4-mini), and a prompt-adaptive weighting mechanism emphasizes the most relevant dimensions. This design not only produces interpretable and modular supervision signals for policy optimization (e.g., GRPO or PPO), but also enables users to directly adjust which aspects to reward or penalize. Experiments with an autoregressive text-to-image model demonstrate that RubricRL improves prompt faithfulness, visual detail, and generalizability, while offering a flexible and extensible foundation for interpretable RL alignment across text-to-image architectures.

Related papers

• StepVAR: Structure-Texture Guided Pruning for Visual Autoregressive Models [98.72926158261937]
  We propose a training-free token pruning framework for Visual AutoRegressive models.<n>We employ a lightweight high-pass filter to capture local texture details, while leveraging Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to preserve global structural information.<n>To maintain valid next-scale prediction under sparse tokens, we introduce a nearest neighbor feature propagation strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-02T11:35:05Z)
• Unified Personalized Reward Model for Vision Generation [27.496220369122494]
  We propose UnifiedReward-Flex, a unified personalized reward model for vision generation.<n>We first distill structured, high-quality reasoning traces from advanced closed-source VLMs to bootstrap SFT.<n>We then perform direct preference optimization (DPO) on carefully curated preference pairs to further strengthen reasoning fidelity and discriminative alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T17:44:21Z)
• REVEALER: Reinforcement-Guided Visual Reasoning for Element-Level Text-Image Alignment Evaluation [10.151027538362259]
  REVEALER is a unified framework for element-level alignment evaluation based on reinforcement-guided visual reasoning.<n>Our method enables Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to explicitly localize semantic elements and derive interpretable alignment judgments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-29T03:24:09Z)
• ARCANE: A Multi-Agent Framework for Interpretable and Configurable Alignment [11.754819989978785]
  ARCANE is a framework that frames alignment as a multi-agent collaboration problem that dynamically represents stakeholder preferences as natural-language rubrics.<n>Inspired by utility theory, we formulate rubric learning as a reconstruction problem and apply a regularized Group-Sequence Policy Optimization (GSPO) procedure.<n>Our results show that rubric-based reward models offer a promising path toward interpretable, test-time adaptive alignment for complex, long-horizon AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-05T22:39:54Z)
• HiCoGen: Hierarchical Compositional Text-to-Image Generation in Diffusion Models via Reinforcement Learning [66.99487505369254]
  HiCoGen is built upon a novel Chain of Synthesis paradigm.<n>It decomposes complex prompts into minimal semantic units.<n>It then synthesizes these units iteratively, where the image generated in each step provides crucial visual context for the next.<n>Experiments show our approach significantly outperforms existing methods in both concept coverage and compositional accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-25T06:24:25Z)
• CIR-CoT: Towards Interpretable Composed Image Retrieval via End-to-End Chain-of-Thought Reasoning [93.05917922306196]
  Composed Image Retrieval (CIR) aims to find a target image from a reference image and a modification text.<n>CIR-CoT is the first end-to-end retrieval-oriented MLLM designed to integrate explicit Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T09:41:45Z)
• Unlocking the Essence of Beauty: Advanced Aesthetic Reasoning with Relative-Absolute Policy Optimization [63.169050703903515]
  We propose Aes-R1, a comprehensive aesthetic reasoning framework with reinforcement learning (RL)<n>Aes-R1 integrates a pipeline, AesCoT, to construct and filter high-quality chain-of-thought aesthetic reasoning data.<n>Experiments demonstrate that Aes-R1 improves the backbone's average PLCC/SRCC by 47.9%/34.8%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T04:55:00Z)
• SCoRE: Streamlined Corpus-based Relation Extraction using Multi-Label Contrastive Learning and Bayesian kNN [0.2812395851874055]
  We introduce SCoRE, a modular and cost-effective sentence-level relation extraction system.<n>SCoRE enables easy PLM switching, requires no finetuning, and adapts smoothly to diverse corpora and KGs.<n>We show that SCoRE matches or surpasses state-of-the-art methods while significantly reducing energy consumption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-09T14:33:07Z)
• Writing-Zero: Bridge the Gap Between Non-verifiable Tasks and Verifiable Rewards [11.149294285483782]
  We propose a unified RLVR-based training paradigm that bridges the gap between non-verifiable tasks and verifiable rewards.<n>We introduce a writing-principle-based pairwise Generative Reward Model (GenRM) and a novel Bootstrapped Relative Policy Optimization (BRPO) algorithm.<n>Our approach empowers LLMs to develop robust writing capabilities without supervised fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T14:34:57Z)
• REBEL: Reinforcement Learning via Regressing Relative Rewards [59.68420022466047]
  We propose REBEL, a minimalist RL algorithm for the era of generative models.<n>In theory, we prove that fundamental RL algorithms like Natural Policy Gradient can be seen as variants of REBEL.<n>We find that REBEL provides a unified approach to language modeling and image generation with stronger or similar performance as PPO and DPO.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-25T17:20:45Z)
• Plug-and-Play Regulators for Image-Text Matching [76.28522712930668]
  Exploiting fine-grained correspondence and visual-semantic alignments has shown great potential in image-text matching. We develop two simple but quite effective regulators which efficiently encode the message output to automatically contextualize and aggregate cross-modal representations. Experiments on MSCOCO and Flickr30K datasets validate that they can bring an impressive and consistent R@1 gain on multiple models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-23T15:42:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.