Securing the Model Context Protocol (MCP): Risks, Controls, and Governance

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2511.20920v1
• Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2025 23:24:26 GMT
• Title: Securing the Model Context Protocol (MCP): Risks, Controls, and Governance
• Authors: Herman Errico, Jiquan Ngiam, Shanita Sojan,
• Abstract summary: We focus on three types of adversaries that take advantage of MCP s flexibility.<n>Based on early incidents and proof-of-concept attacks, we describe how MCP can increase the attack surface.<n>We propose a set of practical controls, including per-user authentication with scoped authorization.
• Score: 1.4072883206858737
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The Model Context Protocol (MCP) replaces static, developer-controlled API integrations with more dynamic, user-driven agent systems, which also introduces new security risks. As MCP adoption grows across community servers and major platforms, organizations encounter threats that existing AI governance frameworks (such as NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42001) do not yet cover in detail. We focus on three types of adversaries that take advantage of MCP s flexibility: content-injection attackers that embed malicious instructions into otherwise legitimate data; supply-chain attackers who distribute compromised servers; and agents who become unintentional adversaries by over-stepping their role. Based on early incidents and proof-of-concept attacks, we describe how MCP can increase the attack surface through data-driven exfiltration, tool poisoning, and cross-system privilege escalation. In response, we propose a set of practical controls, including per-user authentication with scoped authorization, provenance tracking across agent workflows, containerized sandboxing with input/output checks, inline policy enforcement with DLP and anomaly detection, and centralized governance using private registries or gateway layers. The aim is to help organizations ensure that unvetted code does not run outside a sandbox, tools are not used beyond their intended scope, data exfiltration attempts are detectable, and actions can be audited end-to-end. We close by outlining open research questions around verifiable registries, formal methods for these dynamic systems, and privacy-preserving agent operations.

Related papers

• OMNI-LEAK: Orchestrator Multi-Agent Network Induced Data Leakage [59.3826294523924]
  We investigate the security vulnerabilities of a popular multi-agent pattern known as the orchestrator setup.<n>We report the susceptibility of frontier models to different categories of attacks, finding that both reasoning and non-reasoning models are vulnerable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-13T21:32:32Z)
• SMCP: Secure Model Context Protocol [12.950842281962101]
  We introduce the Secure Model Context Protocol (SMCP), which builds on the Model Context Protocol (MCP)<n>MCP has emerged as a standard to unify tool access, allowing agents to discover, invoke, and coordinate with tools more flexibly.<n>SMCP adds unified identity management, robust mutual authentication, ongoing security context propagation, fine-grained policy enforcement, and comprehensive audit logging.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-01T09:59:57Z)
• Towards Verifiably Safe Tool Use for LLM Agents [53.55621104327779]
  Large language model (LLM)-based AI agents extend capabilities by enabling access to tools such as data sources, APIs, search engines, code sandboxes, and even other agents.<n>LLMs may invoke unintended tool interactions and introduce risks, such as leaking sensitive data or overwriting critical records.<n>Current approaches to mitigate these risks, such as model-based safeguards, enhance agents' reliability but cannot guarantee system safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-12T21:31:38Z)
• Agentic AI for Autonomous Defense in Software Supply Chain Security: Beyond Provenance to Vulnerability Mitigation [0.0]
  The current paper includes an example of agentic artificial intelligence (AI) based on autonomous software supply chain security.<n>It combines large language model (LLM)-based reasoning, reinforcement learning (RL), and multi-agent coordination.<n>Results show that agentic AI can facilitate the transition to self defending, proactive software supply chains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-29T14:06:09Z)
• MCPGuard : Automatically Detecting Vulnerabilities in MCP Servers [16.620755774987774]
  The Model Context Protocol (MCP) has emerged as a standardized interface enabling seamless integration between Large Language Models (LLMs) and external data sources and tools.<n>This paper systematically analyzes the security landscape of MCP-based systems, identifying three principal threat categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-27T05:12:51Z)
• Adaptive Attacks on Trusted Monitors Subvert AI Control Protocols [80.68060125494645]
  We study adaptive attacks by an untrusted model that knows the protocol and the monitor model.<n>We instantiate a simple adaptive attack vector by which the attacker embeds publicly known or zero-shot prompt injections in the model outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T15:12:44Z)
• Malice in Agentland: Down the Rabbit Hole of Backdoors in the AI Supply Chain [82.98626829232899]
  Fine-tuning AI agents on data from their own interactions introduces a critical security vulnerability within the AI supply chain.<n>We show that adversaries can easily poison the data collection pipeline to embed hard-to-detect backdoors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-03T12:47:21Z)
• When MCP Servers Attack: Taxonomy, Feasibility, and Mitigation [23.550422942185904]
  Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers enable AI applications to connect to external systems in a plug-and-play manner.<n>Despite this pressing risk, the security implications of MCP servers remain underexplored.<n>We present the first systematic study that treats MCP servers as active threat actors and decomposes them into core components.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T04:29:58Z)
• Enterprise AI Must Enforce Participant-Aware Access Control [9.68210477539956]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in enterprise settings where they interact with multiple users and are trained or fine-tuned on sensitive internal data.<n>We show that adversaries can exploit current fine-tuning and RAG architectures to leak sensitive information by leveraging the lack of access control enforcement.<n>We introduce a framework centered on the principle that any content used in training, retrieval, or generation by an LLM is explicitly authorized for emphall users involved in the interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-18T04:30:49Z)
• Mind Your Server: A Systematic Study of Parasitic Toolchain Attacks on the MCP Ecosystem [13.95558554298296]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated with external systems through the Model Context Protocol (MCP)<n>In this paper, we reveal a new class of attacks, Parasitic Toolchain Attacks, instantiated as MCP Unintended Privacy Disclosure (MCP-UPD)<n>The malicious logic infiltrates the toolchain and unfolds in three phases: Parasitic Ingestion, Privacy Collection, and Privacy Disclosure, culminating in stealthy exfiltration of private data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-08T11:35:32Z)
• Servant, Stalker, Predator: How An Honest, Helpful, And Harmless (3H) Agent Unlocks Adversarial Skills [3.0620527758972496]
  This paper identifies and analyzes a novel vulnerability class in Model Context Protocol based agent systems.<n>The attack chain describes and demonstrates how benign, individually authorized tasks can be orchestrated to produce harmful emergent behaviors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-27T01:11:59Z)
• BlindGuard: Safeguarding LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems under Unknown Attacks [58.959622170433725]
  BlindGuard is an unsupervised defense method that learns without requiring any attack-specific labels or prior knowledge of malicious behaviors.<n>We show that BlindGuard effectively detects diverse attack types (i.e., prompt injection, memory poisoning, and tool attack) across multi-agent systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-11T16:04:47Z)
• DRIFT: Dynamic Rule-Based Defense with Injection Isolation for Securing LLM Agents [52.92354372596197]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly central to agentic systems due to their strong reasoning and planning capabilities.<n>This interaction also introduces the risk of prompt injection attacks, where malicious inputs from external sources can mislead the agent's behavior.<n>We propose a Dynamic Rule-based Isolation Framework for Trustworthy agentic systems, which enforces both control and data-level constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-13T05:01:09Z)
• CANTXSec: A Deterministic Intrusion Detection and Prevention System for CAN Bus Monitoring ECU Activations [53.036288487863786]
  We propose CANTXSec, the first deterministic Intrusion Detection and Prevention system based on physical ECU activations.<n>It detects and prevents classical attacks in the CAN bus, while detecting advanced attacks that have been less investigated in the literature.<n>We prove the effectiveness of our solution on a physical testbed, where we achieve 100% detection accuracy in both classes of attacks while preventing 100% of FIAs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-14T13:37:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.