Asm2SrcEval: Evaluating Large Language Models for Assembly-to-Source Code Translation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.00134v1
• Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2025 12:40:30 GMT
• Title: Asm2SrcEval: Evaluating Large Language Models for Assembly-to-Source Code Translation
• Authors: Parisa Hamedi, Hamed Jelodar, Samita Bai, Mohammad Meymani, Roozbeh Razavi-Far, Ali A. Ghorbani,
• Abstract summary: Assembly-to-source code translation is a critical task in reverse engineering, cybersecurity, and software maintenance.<n>We present the first comprehensive evaluation of five state-of-the-art large language models on assembly-to-source translation.
• Score: 4.45354703148321
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Assembly-to-source code translation is a critical task in reverse engineering, cybersecurity, and software maintenance, yet systematic benchmarks for evaluating large language models on this problem remain scarce. In this work, we present the first comprehensive evaluation of five state-of-the-art large language models on assembly-to-source translation. We assess model performance using a diverse set of metrics capturing lexical similarity (BLEU, ROUGE, and METEOR), semantic alignment (BERTScore), fluency (Perplexity), and efficiency (time prediction). Our results reveal clear trade-offs: while certain models excel in text similarity metrics, others demonstrate lower perplexity or faster inference times. We further provide qualitative analyses of typical model successes and failure cases, highlighting challenges such as control flow recovery and identifier reconstruction. Taken together, our benchmark offers actionable insights into the strengths and limitations of current large language models for program translation, establishing a foundation for future research in combining accuracy with efficiency for real-world applications.

Related papers

• Recovered in Translation: Efficient Pipeline for Automated Translation of Benchmarks and Datasets [2.0199251985015434]
  We present a fully automated framework designed to enable scalable, high-quality translation of datasets and benchmarks.<n>We apply this approach to translate popular benchmarks and datasets into eight Eastern and Southern European languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-25T18:58:25Z)
• Cost-Aware Model Selection for Text Classification: Multi-Objective Trade-offs Between Fine-Tuned Encoders and LLM Prompting in Production [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in open-ended reasoning and generative language tasks.<n>For structured text classification problems with fixed label spaces, model selection is often driven by predictive performance alone.<n>We show that fine-tuned encoder-based models from the BERT family achieve competitive, and often superior, classification performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-06T03:54:28Z)
• Parallel Universes, Parallel Languages: A Comprehensive Study on LLM-based Multilingual Counterfactual Example Generation [49.2073409243885]
  Large language models (LLMs) excel at generating English counterfactuals and demonstrate multilingual proficiency.<n>We conduct automatic evaluations on both directly generated counterfactuals in the target languages and those derived via English translation across six languages.<n>We identify and categorize four main types of errors that consistently appear in the generated counterfactuals across languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-01T08:53:49Z)
• UA-Code-Bench: A Competitive Programming Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Code Generation in Ukrainian [0.42970700836450487]
  This paper introduces UA-Code-Bench, a new open-source benchmark established for a thorough evaluation of language models' code generation and competitive programming problem-solving abilities in Ukrainian.<n>The benchmark comprises 500 problems from the Eolymp platform, evenly distributed across five complexity levels from very easy to very hard.<n>The obtained results reveal that even top-performing models, such as OpenAI o3 and GPT-5, solve only half of the problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-07T07:24:56Z)
• Boosting the Capabilities of Compact Models in Low-Data Contexts with Large Language Models and Retrieval-Augmented Generation [2.9921619703037274]
  We propose a retrieval augmented generation (RAG) framework backed by a large language model (LLM) to correct the output of a smaller model for the linguistic task of morphological glossing. We leverage linguistic information to make up for the lack of data and trainable parameters, while allowing for inputs from written descriptive grammars interpreted and distilled through an LLM. We show that a compact, RAG-supported model is highly effective in data-scarce settings, achieving a new state-of-the-art for this task and our target languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-01T04:20:14Z)
• The Power of Question Translation Training in Multilingual Reasoning: Broadened Scope and Deepened Insights [108.40766216456413]
  We propose a question alignment framework to bridge the gap between large language models' English and non-English performance. Experiment results show it can boost multilingual performance across diverse reasoning scenarios, model families, and sizes. We analyze representation space, generated response and data scales, and reveal how question translation training strengthens language alignment within LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-02T14:49:50Z)
• Lost in the Source Language: How Large Language Models Evaluate the Quality of Machine Translation [64.5862977630713]
  This study investigates how Large Language Models (LLMs) leverage source and reference data in machine translation evaluation task. We find that reference information significantly enhances the evaluation accuracy, while surprisingly, source information sometimes is counterproductive.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T13:23:21Z)
• L2CEval: Evaluating Language-to-Code Generation Capabilities of Large Language Models [102.00201523306986]
  We present L2CEval, a systematic evaluation of the language-to-code generation capabilities of large language models (LLMs) We analyze the factors that potentially affect their performance, such as model size, pretraining data, instruction tuning, and different prompting methods. In addition to assessing model performance, we measure confidence calibration for the models and conduct human evaluations of the output programs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-29T17:57:00Z)
• RAVEN: In-Context Learning with Retrieval-Augmented Encoder-Decoder Language Models [57.12888828853409]
  RAVEN is a model that combines retrieval-augmented masked language modeling and prefix language modeling. Fusion-in-Context Learning enables the model to leverage more in-context examples without requiring additional training. Our work underscores the potential of retrieval-augmented encoder-decoder language models for in-context learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-15T17:59:18Z)
• ICE-Score: Instructing Large Language Models to Evaluate Code [7.556444391696562]
  We propose textttICE-Score, a new evaluation metric via instructing large language models for code assessments. Our metric addresses the limitations of existing approaches by achieving superior correlations with functional correctness and human preferences. Our results demonstrate that our metric surpasses state-of-the-art metrics for code generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-27T16:38:17Z)
• Multi-lingual Evaluation of Code Generation Models [82.7357812992118]
  We present new benchmarks on evaluation code generation models: MBXP and Multilingual HumanEval, and MathQA-X. These datasets cover over 10 programming languages. We are able to assess the performance of code generation models in a multi-lingual fashion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-26T17:17:06Z)
• ELEVATER: A Benchmark and Toolkit for Evaluating Language-Augmented Visual Models [102.63817106363597]
  We build ELEVATER, the first benchmark to compare and evaluate pre-trained language-augmented visual models. It consists of 20 image classification datasets and 35 object detection datasets, each of which is augmented with external knowledge. We will release our toolkit and evaluation platforms for the research community.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-19T10:23:42Z)
• Incorporating Linguistic Knowledge for Abstractive Multi-document Summarization [20.572283625521784]
  We develop a neural network based abstractive multi-document summarization (MDS) model. We process the dependency information into the linguistic-guided attention mechanism. With the help of linguistic signals, sentence-level relations can be correctly captured.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-23T08:13:35Z)
• Code to Comment Translation: A Comparative Study on Model Effectiveness & Errors [19.653423881863834]
  Machine translation models are employed to "translate" code snippets into relevant natural language descriptions. Most evaluations of such models are conducted using automatic reference-based metrics. We compare three recently proposed source code summarization models based on the smoothed BLEU-4, METEOR, and ROUGE-L machine translation metrics. Our investigation reveals new insights into the relationship between metric-based performance and model prediction errors grounded in an empirically derived error taxonomy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-15T20:13:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.