SelfAI: Building a Self-Training AI System with LLM Agents
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.00403v1
- Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2025 09:18:39 GMT
- Title: SelfAI: Building a Self-Training AI System with LLM Agents
- Authors: Xiao Wu, Ting-Zhu Huang, Liang-Jian Deng, Xiaobing Yu, Yu Zhong, Shangqi Deng, Ufaq Khan, Jianghao Wu, Xiaofeng Liu, Imran Razzak, Xiaojun Chang, Yutong Xie,
- Abstract summary: SelfAI is a general multi-agent platform that combines a User Agent for translating high-level research objectives into standardized experimental configurations.<n>An Experiment Manager orchestrates parallel, fault-tolerant training across heterogeneous hardware while maintaining a structured knowledge base for continuous feedback.<n>Across regression, computer vision, scientific computing, medical imaging, and drug discovery benchmarks, SelfAI consistently achieves strong performance and reduces redundant trials.
- Score: 79.10991818561907
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Recent work on autonomous scientific discovery has leveraged LLM-based agents to integrate problem specification, experiment planning, and execution into end-to-end systems. However, these frameworks are often confined to narrow application domains, offer limited real-time interaction with researchers, and lack principled mechanisms for determining when to halt exploration, resulting in inefficiencies, reproducibility challenges, and under-utilized human expertise. To address these gaps, we propose \textit{SelfAI}, a general multi-agent platform that combines a User Agent for translating high-level research objectives into standardized experimental configurations, a Cognitive Agent powered by LLMs with optimal stopping criteria to iteratively refine hyperparameter searches, and an Experiment Manager responsible for orchestrating parallel, fault-tolerant training workflows across heterogeneous hardware while maintaining a structured knowledge base for continuous feedback. We further introduce two novel evaluation metrics, Score and $\text{AUP}_D$, to quantify discovery efficiency and search diversity. Across regression, NLP, computer vision, scientific computing, medical imaging, and drug discovery benchmarks, SelfAI consistently achieves strong performance and reduces redundant trials compared to classical Bayesian optimization and LLM-based baselines, while enabling seamless interaction with human researchers.
Related papers
- AI Agents for Inventory Control: Human-LLM-OR Complementarity [12.448705668487852]
Large language models (LLMs) have generated interest in AI agents that can reason flexibly and incorporate rich contextual signals.<n>We study how OR algorithms, LLMs, and humans can interact and complement each other in a multi-period inventory control setting.<n>We show that, on average, human-AI teams achieve higher profits than either humans or AI agents operating alone.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-13T05:23:46Z) - An Agentic Framework for Autonomous Materials Computation [70.24472585135929]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools for accelerating scientific discovery.<n>Recent advances integrate LLMs into agentic frameworks, enabling retrieval, reasoning, and tool use for complex scientific experiments.<n>Here, we present a domain-specialized agent designed for reliable automation of first-principles materials computations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-22T15:03:57Z) - A Flexible Multi-Agent LLM-Human Framework for Fast Human Validated Tool Building [0.8373057326694192]
We introduce CollabToolBuilder, a flexible multiagent LLM framework with expert-in-the-loop (HITL) guidance.<n>It iteratively learns to create tools for a target goal, aligning with human intent and process.<n>The architecture generates and validates tools via four specialized agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-01T09:19:18Z) - AgentEvolver: Towards Efficient Self-Evolving Agent System [51.54882384204726]
We present AgentEvolver, a self-evolving agent system that drives autonomous agent learning.<n>AgentEvolver introduces three synergistic mechanisms: self-questioning, self-navigating, and self-attributing.<n>Preliminary experiments indicate that AgentEvolver achieves more efficient exploration, better sample utilization, and faster adaptation compared to traditional RL-based baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-13T15:14:47Z) - AutoLabs: Cognitive Multi-Agent Systems with Self-Correction for Autonomous Chemical Experimentation [0.10999592665107412]
AutoLabs is a self-correcting, multi-agent architecture designed to autonomously translate natural-language instructions into executable protocols.<n>We present a comprehensive evaluation framework featuring five benchmark experiments of increasing complexity.<n>Our results demonstrate that agent reasoning capacity is the most critical factor for success.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-30T01:51:46Z) - SFR-DeepResearch: Towards Effective Reinforcement Learning for Autonomously Reasoning Single Agents [93.26456498576181]
This paper focuses on the development of native Autonomous Single-Agent models for Deep Research.<n>Our best variant SFR-DR-20B achieves up to 28.7% on Humanity's Last Exam benchmark.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-08T02:07:09Z) - Benchmarking LLM-based Agents for Single-cell Omics Analysis [6.915378212190715]
AI agents offer a paradigm shift, enabling adaptive planning, executable code generation, traceable decisions, and real-time knowledge fusion.<n>We introduce a novel benchmarking evaluation system to rigorously assess agent capabilities in single-cell omics analysis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-16T04:26:18Z) - Agentic Reinforced Policy Optimization [66.96989268893932]
Large-scale reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has demonstrated its effectiveness in harnessing the potential of large language models (LLMs) for single-turn reasoning tasks.<n>Current RL algorithms inadequately balance the models' intrinsic long-horizon reasoning capabilities and their proficiency in multi-turn tool interactions.<n>We propose Agentic Reinforced Policy Optimization (ARPO), a novel agentic RL algorithm tailored for training multi-turn LLM-based agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-26T07:53:11Z) - Heterogeneous Group-Based Reinforcement Learning for LLM-based Multi-Agent Systems [25.882461853973897]
We propose Multi-Agent Heterogeneous Group Policy Optimization (MHGPO), which guides policy updates by estimating relative reward advantages.<n>MHGPO eliminates the need for Critic networks, enhancing stability and reducing computational overhead.<n>We also introduce three group rollout sampling strategies that trade off between efficiency and effectiveness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-03T10:17:19Z) - The BrowserGym Ecosystem for Web Agent Research [151.90034093362343]
BrowserGym ecosystem addresses the growing need for efficient evaluation and benchmarking of web agents.<n>We propose an extended BrowserGym-based ecosystem for web agent research, which unifies existing benchmarks from the literature.<n>We conduct the first large-scale, multi-benchmark web agent experiment and compare the performance of 6 state-of-the-art LLMs across 6 popular web agent benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-06T23:43:59Z) - SWE-Search: Enhancing Software Agents with Monte Carlo Tree Search and Iterative Refinement [18.84439000902905]
Current large language model (LLM)-based software agents often follow linear, sequential processes.<n>We propose SWE-Search, a multi-agent framework that integrates Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) with a self-improvement mechanism.<n>This highlights the potential of self-evaluation driven search techniques in complex software engineering environments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-26T22:45:56Z) - FactorLLM: Factorizing Knowledge via Mixture of Experts for Large Language Models [50.331708897857574]
We introduce FactorLLM, a novel approach that decomposes well-trained dense FFNs into sparse sub-networks without requiring any further modifications.
FactorLLM achieves comparable performance to the source model securing up to 85% model performance while obtaining over a 30% increase in inference speed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-15T16:45:16Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.