On the Regulatory Potential of User Interfaces for AI Agent Governance

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.00742v1
• Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2025 05:32:13 GMT
• Title: On the Regulatory Potential of User Interfaces for AI Agent Governance
• Authors: K. J. Kevin Feng, Tae Soo Kim, Rock Yuren Pang, Faria Huq, Tal August, Amy X. Zhang,
• Abstract summary: We propose regulating user interfaces of AI agents as a way of enforcing transparency and behavioral requirements.<n>We analyze 22 existing agentic systems to identify UI elements that play key roles in human-agent interaction and communication.<n>Our work exposes a new surface for regulatory action that supplements previous proposals for practical AI agent governance.
• Score: 27.951021158233587
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: AI agents that take actions in their environment autonomously over extended time horizons require robust governance interventions to curb their potentially consequential risks. Prior proposals for governing AI agents primarily target system-level safeguards (e.g., prompt injection monitors) or agent infrastructure (e.g., agent IDs). In this work, we explore a complementary approach: regulating user interfaces of AI agents as a way of enforcing transparency and behavioral requirements that then demand changes at the system and/or infrastructure levels. Specifically, we analyze 22 existing agentic systems to identify UI elements that play key roles in human-agent interaction and communication. We then synthesize those elements into six high-level interaction design patterns that hold regulatory potential (e.g., requiring agent memory to be editable). We conclude with policy recommendations based on our analysis. Our work exposes a new surface for regulatory action that supplements previous proposals for practical AI agent governance.

Related papers

• Adaptation of Agentic AI [162.63072848575695]
  We unify the rapidly expanding research landscape into a systematic framework that spans both agent adaptations and tool adaptations.<n>We demonstrate that this framework helps clarify the design space of adaptation strategies in agentic AI.<n>We then review the representative approaches in each category, analyze their strengths and limitations, and highlight key open challenges and future opportunities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-18T08:38:51Z)
• A Comprehensive Survey of Self-Evolving AI Agents: A New Paradigm Bridging Foundation Models and Lifelong Agentic Systems [53.37728204835912]
  Most existing AI systems rely on manually crafted configurations that remain static after deployment.<n>Recent research has explored agent evolution techniques that aim to automatically enhance agent systems based on interaction data and environmental feedback.<n>This survey aims to provide researchers and practitioners with a systematic understanding of self-evolving AI agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-10T16:07:32Z)
• Agentic Web: Weaving the Next Web with AI Agents [109.13815627467514]
  The emergence of AI agents powered by large language models (LLMs) marks a pivotal shift toward the Agentic Web.<n>In this paradigm, agents interact directly with one another to plan, coordinate, and execute complex tasks on behalf of users.<n>We present a structured framework for understanding and building the Agentic Web.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-28T17:58:12Z)
• Levels of Autonomy for AI Agents [9.324309359500198]
  We argue that an agent's level of autonomy can be treated as a deliberate design decision, separate from its capability and operational environment.<n>We define five levels of escalating agent autonomy, characterized by the roles a user can take when interacting with an agent.<n>We highlight a potential application of our framework towards AI autonomy certificates to govern agent behavior in single- and multi-agent systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-14T12:14:36Z)
• TRiSM for Agentic AI: A Review of Trust, Risk, and Security Management in LLM-based Agentic Multi-Agent Systems [8.683314804719506]
  This review presents a structured analysis of Trust, Risk, and Security Management (TRiSM) in the context of Agentic Multi-Agent Systems (AMAS)<n>We begin by examining the conceptual foundations of Agentic AI and highlight its architectural distinctions from traditional AI agents.<n>We then adapt and extend the AI TRiSM framework for Agentic AI, structured around key pillars: textit Explainability, ModelOps, Security, Privacy and textittheir lifecycle governance<n>A risk taxonomy is proposed to capture the unique threats and vulnerabilities of Agentic AI, ranging from coordination failures to
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-04T16:26:11Z)
• A Novel Zero-Trust Identity Framework for Agentic AI: Decentralized Authentication and Fine-Grained Access Control [7.228060525494563]
  This paper posits the imperative for a novel Agentic AI IAM framework.<n>We propose a comprehensive framework built upon rich, verifiable Agent Identities (IDs)<n>We also explore how Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs) enable privacy-preserving attribute disclosure and verifiable policy compliance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-25T20:21:55Z)
• Internet of Agents: Fundamentals, Applications, and Challenges [68.9543153075464]
  We introduce the Internet of Agents (IoA) as a foundational framework that enables seamless interconnection, dynamic discovery, and collaborative orchestration among heterogeneous agents at scale.<n>We analyze the key operational enablers of IoA, including capability notification and discovery, adaptive communication protocols, dynamic task matching, consensus and conflict-resolution mechanisms, and incentive models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-12T02:04:37Z)
• SAGA: A Security Architecture for Governing AI Agentic Systems [13.758038956671834]
  Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents increasingly interact, collaborate, and delegate tasks to one another autonomously with minimal human interaction.<n>Industry guidelines for agentic system governance emphasize the need for users to maintain comprehensive control over their agents.<n>We propose SAGA, a scalable Security Architecture for Governing Agentic systems, that offers user oversight over their agents' lifecycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-27T23:10:00Z)
• Agentic Business Process Management: Practitioner Perspectives on Agent Governance in Business Processes [0.7270112855088837]
  With the rise of generative AI, industry interest in software agents is growing.<n>This paper investigates how organizations can effectively govern AI agents.<n>It outlines six key recommendations for the responsible adoption of AI agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-23T20:15:24Z)
• Agent-as-a-Judge: Evaluate Agents with Agents [61.33974108405561]
  We introduce the Agent-as-a-Judge framework, wherein agentic systems are used to evaluate agentic systems. This is an organic extension of the LLM-as-a-Judge framework, incorporating agentic features that enable intermediate feedback for the entire task-solving process. We present DevAI, a new benchmark of 55 realistic automated AI development tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T17:57:02Z)
• Internet of Agents: Weaving a Web of Heterogeneous Agents for Collaborative Intelligence [79.5316642687565]
  Existing multi-agent frameworks often struggle with integrating diverse capable third-party agents. We propose the Internet of Agents (IoA), a novel framework that addresses these limitations. IoA introduces an agent integration protocol, an instant-messaging-like architecture design, and dynamic mechanisms for agent teaming and conversation flow control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-09T17:33:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.