The AI Attribution Paradox: Transparency as Social Strategy in Open-Source Software Development

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.00867v1
• Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2025 12:30:55 GMT
• Title: The AI Attribution Paradox: Transparency as Social Strategy in Open-Source Software Development
• Authors: Obada Kraishan,
• Abstract summary: We analyze 14,300 GitHub commits across 7,393 repositories from 2023-2025.<n>We investigated attribution strategies and community responses across eight major AI tools.<n>We find developers strategically balance acknowledging AI assistance with managing community scrutiny.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: AI coding assistants have transformed software development, raising questions about transparency and attribution practices. We examine the "AI attribution paradox": how developers strategically balance acknowledging AI assistance with managing community scrutiny. Analyzing 14,300 GitHub commits across 7,393 repositories from 2023-2025, we investigated attribution strategies and community responses across eight major AI tools. Results reveal widespread AI usage (95.2% of commits) but strategic attribution: only 29.5% employ explicit disclosure, with dramatic tool variation (Claude 80.5% versus Copilot 9.0%). Explicit attribution triggers modest scrutiny (23% more questions and 21% more comments) but tool choice matters 20-30 times more for predicting reception. Community sentiment remains neutral regardless of attribution type, suggesting curiosity rather than hostility. Temporal analyses show rapid norm evolution: explicit attribution increased from near-zero in early 2024 to 40% by late 2025, indicating community adaptation. These findings illuminate attribution as strategic communication rather than simple transparency, advancing understanding of algorithmic accountability and norm formation during technological transitions. We discuss implications for developers navigating disclosure decisions, platforms designing attribution mechanisms, and researchers studying emergent practices in AI-augmented collaborative work.

Related papers

• Why Are AI Agent Involved Pull Requests (Fix-Related) Remain Unmerged? An Empirical Study [5.127121704630949]
  We analyze 8,106 fix related PRs authored by five widely used AI coding agents from the AIDEV POP dataset.<n>Our results indicate that test case failures and prior resolution of the same issues by other PRs are the most common causes of non integration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T22:06:58Z)
• How AI Coding Agents Modify Code: A Large-Scale Study of GitHub Pull Requests [0.0]
  We analyze 24,014 merged Agentic PRs (440,295 commits) and 5,081 merged Human PRs (23,242 commits)<n>Agentic PRs differ substantially from Human PRs in commit count (Cliff's $= 0.5429$) and show moderate differences in files touched and deleted lines.<n>These findings provide a large-scale empirical characterization of how AI coding agents contribute to open source development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-24T20:27:04Z)
• Early-Stage Prediction of Review Effort in AI-Generated Pull Requests [0.0]
  We analyze 33,707 agent-authored PRs from the AIDev dataset across 2,807 repositories.<n>We propose a Circuit Breaker triage model that predicts high-review-effort PRs at creation time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-02T17:18:01Z)
• Reduced AI Acceptance After the Generative AI Boom: Evidence From a Two-Wave Survey Study [40.26767449635043]
  We examine shifts in public attitudes toward AI before and after the launch of ChatGPT.<n>The proportion of respondents finding AI "not acceptable at all" increased from 23% to 30%.<n>These shifts have amplified existing social inequalities in terms of widened educational, linguistic, and gender gaps post-boom.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-27T17:47:58Z)
• Impatient Users Confuse AI Agents: High-fidelity Simulations of Human Traits for Testing Agents [58.00130492861884]
  TraitBasis is a lightweight, model-agnostic method for systematically stress testing AI agents.<n>TraitBasis learns directions in activation space corresponding to steerable user traits.<n>We observe on average a 2%-30% performance degradation on $tau$-Trait across frontier models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-06T05:03:57Z)
• LIMI: Less is More for Agency [49.63355240818081]
  LIMI (Less Is More for Intelligent Agency) demonstrates that agency follows radically different development principles.<n>We show that sophisticated agentic intelligence can emerge from minimal but strategically curated demonstrations of autonomous behavior.<n>Our findings establish the Agency Efficiency Principle: machine autonomy emerges not from data abundance but from strategic curation of high-quality agentic demonstrations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-22T10:59:32Z)
• Security Challenges in AI Agent Deployment: Insights from a Large Scale Public Competition [101.86739402748995]
  We run the largest public red-teaming competition to date, targeting 22 frontier AI agents across 44 realistic deployment scenarios.<n>We build the Agent Red Teaming benchmark and evaluate it across 19 state-of-the-art models.<n>Our findings highlight critical and persistent vulnerabilities in today's AI agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-28T05:13:04Z)
• Measuring the Impact of Early-2025 AI on Experienced Open-Source Developer Productivity [0.5789840336223054]
  Despite widespread adoption, the impact of AI tools on software development in the wild remains understudied.<n>We conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to understand how AI tools at the February-June 2025 frontier affect the productivity of experienced open-source developers.<n>16 developers with moderate AI experience complete 246 tasks in mature projects on which they have an average of 5 years of prior experience.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-12T00:16:33Z)
• Surgeons Awareness, Expectations, and Involvement with Artificial Intelligence: a Survey Pre and Post the GPT Era [3.6923164139355578]
  This study examines surgeons' awareness, expectations, and involvement with AI in surgery through comparative surveys conducted in 2021 and 2024.<n>Awareness of AI courses rose from 14.5% in 2021 to 44.6% in 2024, while course attendance increased from 12.9% to 23%.<n>Expectations for AI's role shifted in 2024, with hospital management gaining relevance.<n>Interdisciplinary collaboration and structured training were identified as critical for successful AI adoption.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-09T21:46:08Z)
• When Will AI Transform Society? Swedish Public Predictions on AI Development Timelines [0.0]
  This study investigates public expectations regarding the likelihood and timing of major artificial intelligence (AI) developments among Swedes.<n>We examined expectations across six key scenarios: medical breakthroughs, mass unemployment, democratic deterioration, living standard improvements, artificial general intelligence (AGI) and uncontrollable superintelligent AI.<n>Findings reveal strong consensus on AI-driven medical breakthroughs (82.6%), while expectations for other major developments are significantly lower.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-05T13:57:04Z)
• The 2024 Foundation Model Transparency Index [54.78174872757794]
  Foundation Model Transparency Index (FMTI) was launched in October 2023 to measure the transparency of leading foundation model developers.<n>FMTI 2023 assessed 10 major foundation model developers on 100 transparency indicators.<n>We conduct a follow-up study after 6 months: we score 14 developers against the same 100 indicators.<n>While in FMTI 2023 we searched for publicly available information, in FMTI 2024 developers submit reports on the 100 transparency indicators.<n>We find that developers now score 58 out of 100 on average, a 21 point improvement over FMTI 2023.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T18:03:37Z)
• Rethinking People Analytics With Inverse Transparency by Design [57.67333075002697]
  We propose a new design approach for workforce analytics we refer to as inverse transparency by design. We find that architectural changes are made without inhibiting core functionality. We conclude that inverse transparency by design is a promising approach to realize accepted and responsible people analytics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-16T21:37:35Z)
• Fairness in AI and Its Long-Term Implications on Society [68.8204255655161]
  We take a closer look at AI fairness and analyze how lack of AI fairness can lead to deepening of biases over time. We discuss how biased models can lead to more negative real-world outcomes for certain groups. If the issues persist, they could be reinforced by interactions with other risks and have severe implications on society in the form of social unrest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-16T11:22:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.