Memory-Augmented Knowledge Fusion with Safety-Aware Decoding for Domain-Adaptive Question Answering

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.02363v1
• Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2025 03:12:14 GMT
• Title: Memory-Augmented Knowledge Fusion with Safety-Aware Decoding for Domain-Adaptive Question Answering
• Authors: Lei Fu, Xiang Chen, Kaige Gao Xinyue Huang, Kejian Tong,
• Abstract summary: We introduce Knowledge-Aware Reasoning and Memory-Augmented Adaptation (KARMA), a novel framework designed to enhance QA performance in care scenarios.<n>KARMA incorporates a dual-encoder architecture to fuse structured and unstructured knowledge sources, a gated memory unit to dynamically regulate external knowledge integration, and a safety-aware controllable decoder.
• Score: 7.794451415614666
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Domain-specific question answering (QA) systems for services face unique challenges in integrating heterogeneous knowledge sources while ensuring both accuracy and safety. Existing large language models often struggle with factual consistency and context alignment in sensitive domains such as healthcare policies and government welfare. In this work, we introduce Knowledge-Aware Reasoning and Memory-Augmented Adaptation (KARMA), a novel framework designed to enhance QA performance in care scenarios. KARMA incorporates a dual-encoder architecture to fuse structured and unstructured knowledge sources, a gated memory unit to dynamically regulate external knowledge integration, and a safety-aware controllable decoder that mitigates unsafe outputs using safety classification and guided generation techniques. Extensive experiments on a proprietary QA dataset demonstrate that KARMA outperforms strong baselines in both answer quality and safety. This study offers a comprehensive solution for building trustworthy and adaptive QA systems in service contexts.

Related papers

• CC-VQA: Conflict- and Correlation-Aware Method for Mitigating Knowledge Conflict in Knowledge-Based Visual Question Answering [53.7094431951084]
  Knowledge-based visual question answering (KB-VQA) demonstrates significant potential for handling knowledge-intensive tasks.<n>Conflicts arise between static parametric knowledge in vision language models and dynamically retrieved information.<n>We propose textbfCC-VQA as a training-free, conflict- and correlation-aware method for KB-VQA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-27T11:56:26Z)
• CARE: Decoding Time Safety Alignment via Rollback and Introspection Intervention [68.95008546581339]
  Existing decoding-time interventions, such as Contrastive Decoding, often force a severe trade-off between safety and response quality.<n>We propose CARE, a novel framework for decoding-time safety alignment that integrates three key components.<n>The framework achieves a superior balance of safety, quality, and efficiency, attaining a low harmful response rate and minimal disruption to the user experience.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-01T04:50:02Z)
• Know3-RAG: A Knowledge-aware RAG Framework with Adaptive Retrieval, Generation, and Filtering [9.814926166669366]
  We propose Know3-RAG, a knowledge-aware RAG framework that leverages structured knowledge from knowledge graphs (KGs) to guide three core stages of the RAG process, including retrieval, generation, and filtering.<n> Experiments on multiple open-domain QA benchmarks demonstrate that Know3-RAG consistently outperforms strong baselines, significantly reducing hallucinations and enhancing answer reliability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-19T03:25:18Z)
• MES-RAG: Bringing Multi-modal, Entity-Storage, and Secure Enhancements to RAG [65.0423152595537]
  We propose MES-RAG, which enhances entity-specific query handling and provides accurate, secure, and consistent responses.<n>MES-RAG introduces proactive security measures that ensure system integrity by applying protections prior to data access.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that MES-RAG significantly improves both accuracy and recall, highlighting its effectiveness in advancing the security and utility of question-answering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-17T08:09:42Z)
• Towards Trustworthy Retrieval Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey [92.36487127683053]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is an advanced technique designed to address the challenges of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Content (AIGC)<n>RAG provides reliable and up-to-date external knowledge, reduces hallucinations, and ensures relevant context across a wide range of tasks.<n>Despite RAG's success and potential, recent studies have shown that the RAG paradigm also introduces new risks, including privacy concerns, adversarial attacks, and accountability issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-08T06:50:47Z)
• Agentic AI-Driven Technical Troubleshooting for Enterprise Systems: A Novel Weighted Retrieval-Augmented Generation Paradigm [0.0]
  This paper presents a novel agentic AI solution built on a Weighted Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) Framework tailored for enterprise technical troubleshooting.<n>By dynamically weighting retrieval sources such as product manuals, internal knowledge bases, FAQ, and troubleshooting guides, the framework prioritizes the most relevant data.<n>Preliminary evaluations on large enterprise datasets demonstrate the framework's efficacy in improving troubleshooting accuracy, reducing resolution times, and adapting to varied technical challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-16T17:32:38Z)
• Automating Semantic Analysis of System Assurance Cases using Goal-directed ASP [1.2189422792863451]
  We present our approach to enhancing Assurance 2.0 with semantic rule-based analysis capabilities. We examine the unique semantic aspects of assurance cases, such as logical consistency, adequacy, indefeasibility, etc.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-21T15:22:43Z)
• Merging Generated and Retrieved Knowledge for Open-Domain QA [72.42262579925911]
  COMBO is a compatibility-Oriented knowledge Merging for Better Open-domain QA framework. We show that COMBO outperforms competitive baselines on three out of four tested open-domain QA benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-22T19:37:06Z)
• Rely-guarantee Reasoning about Concurrent Memory Management: Correctness, Safety and Security [0.0]
  An incorrect specification and implementation of the memory management may lead to system crashes or exploitable attacks. This article presents the first formal specification and mechanized proof of a concurrent memory management for a real-world OS.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-17T03:41:10Z)
• Towards Quantification of Assurance for Learning-enabled Components [3.0938904602244355]
  This paper develops a notion of assurance for LECs based on i) identifying the relevant dependability attributes, and ii) quantifying those attributes and the associated uncertainty. We identify the applicable quantitative measures of assurance, and characterize the associated uncertainty using a non-parametric Bayesian approach. We additionally discuss the relevance and contribution of LEC assurance to system-level assurance, the generalizability of our approach, and the associated challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-21T17:34:05Z)
• Recursively Feasible Probabilistic Safe Online Learning with Control Barrier Functions [60.26921219698514]
  We introduce a model-uncertainty-aware reformulation of CBF-based safety-critical controllers. We then present the pointwise feasibility conditions of the resulting safety controller. We use these conditions to devise an event-triggered online data collection strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-23T05:02:09Z)
• KAT: A Knowledge Augmented Transformer for Vision-and-Language [56.716531169609915]
  We propose a novel model - Knowledge Augmented Transformer (KAT) - which achieves a strong state-of-the-art result on the open-domain multimodal task of OK-VQA. Our approach integrates implicit and explicit knowledge in an end to end encoder-decoder architecture, while still jointly reasoning over both knowledge sources during answer generation. An additional benefit of explicit knowledge integration is seen in improved interpretability of model predictions in our analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-16T04:37:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.