Decentralized Multi-Agent System with Trust-Aware Communication
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.02410v1
- Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2025 04:39:12 GMT
- Title: Decentralized Multi-Agent System with Trust-Aware Communication
- Abstract summary: We propose a novel Decentralized Multi-Agent System (DMAS) architecture for the Internet of Agents.<n>Our DMAS features a decentralized agent runtime underpinned by a blockchain-based architecture.<n>Our performance analysis validates the DMAS as a scalable and efficient solution for building trustworthy multi-agent systems.
- Score: 5.408079087907132
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: The emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) is rapidly accelerating the development of autonomous multi-agent systems (MAS), paving the way for the Internet of Agents. However, traditional centralized MAS architectures present significant challenges, including single points of failure, vulnerability to censorship, inherent scalability limitations, and critical trust issues. We propose a novel Decentralized Multi-Agent System (DMAS) architecture designed to overcome these fundamental problems by enabling trust-aware, scalable, and censorship-resistant interactions among autonomous agents. Our DMAS features a decentralized agent runtime underpinned by a blockchain-based architecture. We formalize a trust-aware communication protocol that leverages cryptographic primitives and on-chain operations to provide security properties: verifiable interaction cycles, communication integrity, authenticity, non-repudiation, and conditional confidentiality, which we further substantiate through a comprehensive security analysis. Our performance analysis validates the DMAS as a scalable and efficient solution for building trustworthy multi-agent systems.
Related papers
- Blockchain Empowered Trustworthy Agent Networks: Foundations, Taxonomy, and Future Directions [47.65093774088672]
This survey and tutorial article reviews the literature over the period 1980--2026 on the evolution from classical multi-agent systems to open agent networks.<n>We first review this evolution and show how the trust boundary expands from individual execution to cross-agent, cross-platform, and cross-organizational interaction.<n>We develop a five-dimensional taxonomy covering entity and capability trust, authorization and delegation trust, information and trust, coordination and group-robustness trust, and accountability and settlement trust.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-05T09:32:35Z) - D-MUTRA: DLT-based MUTual Remote Attestation for Multi-Agent Systems [0.5262506959175032]
This paper presents D-MUTRA, a blockchain-based framework that introduces a mutual RA protocol in multi-agent systems.<n>Agents measure their integrity while verifying that of their peers, acting as both prover and verifier.<n>Results show that D-MUTRA enables agents to continuously attest one another, detects malicious software modifications, and scales to large deployments with negligible overhead.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-08-03T09:10:31Z) - Towards trustworthy agentic AI: a comprehensive survey of safety, robustness, privacy, and system security [57.35851886874902]
Agentic AI systems execute complex tasks autonomously, but their multi-step trajectories introduce new failure modes that challenge trustworthiness.<n>This survey provides a focused examination of trustworthy agentic AI through two core dimensions that are critical for high-risk deployments.<n>For each dimension, we clarify key concepts, identify where risks emerge along the agent workflow, and summarize stage-targeted mitigation strategies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-17T10:26:37Z) - DecodingTrust-Agent Platform (DTap): A Controllable and Interactive Red-Teaming Platform for AI Agents [121.77550256034]
DecodingTrust-Agent Platform (DTap) is a controllable and interactive red-teaming platform for AI agents.<n>DTap-Red is the first autonomous red-teaming agent that explores diverse injection vectors and autonomously discovers effective attack strategies.<n>Through DTap, we conduct large-scale evaluations of popular AI agents built on various backbone models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-06T11:59:48Z) - OMNI-LEAK: Orchestrator Multi-Agent Network Induced Data Leakage [59.3826294523924]
We investigate the security vulnerabilities of a popular multi-agent pattern known as the orchestrator setup.<n>We report the susceptibility of frontier models to different categories of attacks, finding that both reasoning and non-reasoning models are vulnerable.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-13T21:32:32Z) - Just Ask: Curious Code Agents Reveal System Prompts in Frontier LLMs [65.6660735371212]
We present textbftextscJustAsk, a framework that autonomously discovers effective extraction strategies through interaction alone.<n>It formulates extraction as an online exploration problem, using Upper Confidence Bound--based strategy selection and a hierarchical skill space spanning atomic probes and high-level orchestration.<n>Our results expose system prompts as a critical yet largely unprotected attack surface in modern agent systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-29T03:53:25Z) - Exposing Weak Links in Multi-Agent Systems under Adversarial Prompting [5.544819942438653]
We present SafeAgents, a framework for fine-grained security assessment of multi-agent systems.<n>We conduct a study across five widely adopted multi-agent architectures.<n>Our findings reveal that common design patterns carry significant vulnerabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-14T04:22:49Z) - Using the NANDA Index Architecture in Practice: An Enterprise Perspective [9.707223291705601]
The proliferation of autonomous AI agents represents a paradigmatic shift from traditional web architectures toward collaborative intelligent systems.<n>This paper presents a comprehensive framework addressing the fundamental infrastructure requirements for secure, trustworthy, and interoperable AI agent ecosystems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-05T05:27:27Z) - BlockA2A: Towards Secure and Verifiable Agent-to-Agent Interoperability [8.539128225018489]
BlockA2A is a unified multi-agent trust framework for agent-to-agent interoperability.<n>It eliminates centralized trust bottlenecks, ensures message authenticity and execution integrity, and guarantees accountability across agent interactions.<n>It neutralizes attacks through real-time mechanisms, including Byzantine agent flagging, reactive execution halting, and instant permission revocation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-02T11:59:21Z) - Attention Knows Whom to Trust: Attention-based Trust Management for LLM Multi-Agent Systems [52.57826440085856]
Large Language Model-based Multi-Agent Systems (LLM-MAS) have demonstrated strong capabilities in solving complex tasks but remain vulnerable when agents receive unreliable messages.<n>This vulnerability stems from a fundamental gap: LLM agents treat all incoming messages equally without evaluating their trustworthiness.<n>We propose Attention Trust Score (A-Trust), a lightweight, attention-based method for evaluating message trustworthiness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-03T07:32:57Z) - LLM Agents Should Employ Security Principles [60.03651084139836]
This paper argues that the well-established design principles in information security should be employed when deploying Large Language Model (LLM) agents at scale.<n>We introduce AgentSandbox, a conceptual framework embedding these security principles to provide safeguards throughout an agent's life-cycle.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-29T21:39:08Z) - Zero-Trust Foundation Models: A New Paradigm for Secure and Collaborative Artificial Intelligence for Internet of Things [61.43014629640404]
Zero-Trust Foundation Models (ZTFMs) embed zero-trust security principles into the lifecycle of foundation models (FMs) for Internet of Things (IoT) systems.<n>ZTFMs can enable secure, privacy-preserving AI across distributed, heterogeneous, and potentially adversarial IoT environments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-26T06:44:31Z) - A Novel Zero-Trust Identity Framework for Agentic AI: Decentralized Authentication and Fine-Grained Access Control [7.228060525494563]
This paper posits the imperative for a novel Agentic AI IAM framework.<n>We propose a comprehensive framework built upon rich, verifiable Agent Identities (IDs)<n>We also explore how Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs) enable privacy-preserving attribute disclosure and verifiable policy compliance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-25T20:21:55Z) - A Weighted Byzantine Fault Tolerance Consensus Driven Trusted Multiple Large Language Models Network [53.37983409425452]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success across a wide range of applications.<n>Recently, collaborative frameworks such as the Multi-LLM Network (MultiLLMN) have been introduced.<n>We propose a novel Trusted MultiLLMN framework driven by a weighted Byzantine Fault Tolerance (WBFT) blockchain consensus mechanism.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-08T10:04:41Z) - Red-Teaming LLM Multi-Agent Systems via Communication Attacks [10.872328358364776]
Large Language Model-based Multi-Agent Systems (LLM-MAS) have revolutionized complex problem-solving capability by enabling sophisticated agent collaboration through message-based communications.<n>We introduce Agent-in-the-Middle (AiTM), a novel attack that exploits the fundamental communication mechanisms in LLM-MAS by intercepting and manipulating inter-agent messages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-20T18:55:39Z) - Internet of Agents: Weaving a Web of Heterogeneous Agents for Collaborative Intelligence [79.5316642687565]
Existing multi-agent frameworks often struggle with integrating diverse capable third-party agents.
We propose the Internet of Agents (IoA), a novel framework that addresses these limitations.
IoA introduces an agent integration protocol, an instant-messaging-like architecture design, and dynamic mechanisms for agent teaming and conversation flow control.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-09T17:33:24Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.