PPTBench: Towards Holistic Evaluation of Large Language Models for PowerPoint Layout and Design Understanding

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.02624v1
• Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2025 10:33:31 GMT
• Title: PPTBench: Towards Holistic Evaluation of Large Language Models for PowerPoint Layout and Design Understanding
• Abstract summary: PowerPoint presentations combine rich textual content with structured visual layouts, making them a natural testbed for evaluating the multimodal reasoning and layout understanding abilities of modern MLLMs.<n>Existing benchmarks focus solely on narrow subtasks while overlooking layout-centric challenges, which are central to real-world slide creation and editing.<n>We introduce PPTBench, a comprehensive multimodal benchmark for evaluating LLMs on PowerPoint-related tasks.
• Score: 14.793139089425836
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: PowerPoint presentations combine rich textual content with structured visual layouts, making them a natural testbed for evaluating the multimodal reasoning and layout understanding abilities of modern MLLMs. However, existing benchmarks focus solely on narrow subtasks while overlooking layout-centric challenges, which are central to real-world slide creation and editing. To bridge this gap, we introduce PPTBench, a comprehensive multimodal benchmark for evaluating LLMs on PowerPoint-related tasks. Leveraging a diverse source of 958 PPTX files, PPTBench evaluates models across four categories with 4,439 samples, including Detection, Understanding, Modification, and Generation. Our experiments reveal a substantial gap between semantic understanding and visual-layout reasoning in current MLLMs: models can interpret slide content but fail to produce coherent spatial arrangements. Ablation and further analysis show that current MLLMs struggle to combine visual cues with JSON-based layout structures and fail to integrate visual information into their API planning ability. And case studies visually expose systematic layout errors such as misalignment and element overlap. These findings provides a new perspective on evaluating VLLMs in PPT scenarios, highlighting challenges and directions for future research on visual-structural reasoning and coherent slide generation. All datasets and code are fully released to support reproducibility and future research.

Related papers

• Multimodal Continual Learning with MLLMs from Multi-scenario Perspectives [61.64550292163646]
  Continual learning in visual understanding aims to deal with catastrophic forgetting in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs)<n>We construct a multimodal visual understanding dataset (MSVQA) encompassing four different scenarios and perspectives.<n>We propose mUltimodal coNtInual learning with MLLMs From multi-scenarIo pERspectives (UNIFIER) to address visual discrepancies while learning different scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-23T15:47:49Z)
• VLM-SlideEval: Evaluating VLMs on Structured Comprehension and Perturbation Sensitivity in PPT [0.0]
  Vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly used to evaluate multimodal content, including presentation slides, but their slide-specific understanding remains underexplored.<n>We introduce VLM-SlideEval, an evaluation framework that probes VLMs along three axes: (1) element-level extraction from slide images aligned to ground truth; (2) to controlled perturbations in geometry, style, and text; and (3) higher-level comprehension, such as recovering a deck's narrative order from shuffled slides.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-24T22:06:56Z)
• Abstractive Visual Understanding of Multi-modal Structured Knowledge: A New Perspective for MLLM Evaluation [48.462734327375536]
  Multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) incorporate heterogeneous modalities into LLMs, enabling a comprehensive understanding of diverse scenarios and objects.<n>Despite the proliferation of evaluation benchmarks and leaderboards for MLLMs, they predominantly overlook the critical capacity of MLLMs to comprehend world knowledge with structured abstractions that appear in visual form.<n>We propose M3STR, an innovative benchmark grounded in the Multi-Modal Map for STRuctured understanding.<n>Our findings reveal persistent deficiencies in processing abstractive visual information with structured knowledge, thereby charting a pivotal trajectory for advancing MLLMs' holistic reasoning capacities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-02T04:00:35Z)
• MC-Bench: A Benchmark for Multi-Context Visual Grounding in the Era of MLLMs [61.56904387052982]
  This paper proposes a new visual grounding task called multi-context visual grounding.<n>It aims to localize instances of interest across multiple images based on open-ended text prompts.<n>We benchmark over 20 state-of-the-art MLLMs and foundation models with potential multi-context visual grounding capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T07:52:57Z)
• Large Language Models Understand Layout [6.732578061359833]
  Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate extraordinary abilities in a wide range of natural language processing (NLP) tasks. We show that, beyond text understanding capability, LLMs are capable of processing text layouts denoted by spatial markers. We show that layout understanding ability is beneficial for building efficient visual question-answering (VQA) systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-08T09:03:12Z)
• Cambrian-1: A Fully Open, Vision-Centric Exploration of Multimodal LLMs [61.143381152739046]
  We introduce Cambrian-1, a family of multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) designed with a vision-centric approach.<n>Our study uses LLMs and visual instruction tuning as an interface to evaluate various visual representations.<n>We provide model weights, code, supporting tools, datasets, and detailed instruction-tuning and evaluation recipes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T17:59:42Z)
• NPHardEval4V: Dynamic Evaluation of Large Vision-Language Models with Effects of Vision [64.83085920775316]
  We introduce NPHardEval4V, a multimodal benchmark suite grounded in four classical NP-hard problems.<n>Each task is presented through a combination of structured visual layouts and textual prompts, designed to assess the ability of LVLMs to perform reasoning under visual-linguistic constraints.<n>Our results show that while these models perform reasonably well on perception-based inputs, they struggle with global optimization, abstraction, and constraint satisfaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-04T07:10:31Z)
• Mementos: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Multimodal Large Language Model Reasoning over Image Sequences [80.54979242912944]
  This paper introduces Mementos, a new benchmark designed to assess MLLMs' sequential image reasoning abilities. We find that MLLMs struggle to accurately describe dynamic information about given image sequences, often leading to hallucinations/misrepresentations of objects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-19T07:10:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.