Formal Analysis of the Sigmoid Function and Formal Proof of the Universal Approximation Theorem

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.03635v1
• Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2025 10:16:02 GMT
• Title: Formal Analysis of the Sigmoid Function and Formal Proof of the Universal Approximation Theorem
• Abstract summary: We present a formalization of the sigmoid function, proving its monotonicity, smoothness, and higher-order derivatives.<n>We provide a constructive proof of the Universal Approximation Theorem, demonstrating that neural networks with sigmoidal activation functions can approximate any continuous function on a compact interval.<n>Our work enhances trust in neural networks and contributes to the broader goal of verified and trustworthy machine learning.
• Score: 0.2599882743586163
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This paper presents a formalized analysis of the sigmoid function and a fully mechanized proof of the Universal Approximation Theorem (UAT) in Isabelle/HOL, a higher-order logic theorem prover. The sigmoid function plays a fundamental role in neural networks; yet, its formal properties, such as differentiability, higher-order derivatives, and limit behavior, have not previously been comprehensively mechanized in a proof assistant. We present a rigorous formalization of the sigmoid function, proving its monotonicity, smoothness, and higher-order derivatives. We provide a constructive proof of the UAT, demonstrating that neural networks with sigmoidal activation functions can approximate any continuous function on a compact interval. Our work identifies and addresses gaps in Isabelle/HOL's formal proof libraries and introduces simpler methods for reasoning about the limits of real functions. By exploiting theorem proving for AI verification, our work enhances trust in neural networks and contributes to the broader goal of verified and trustworthy machine learning.

Related papers

• Compile to Compress: Boosting Formal Theorem Provers by Compiler Outputs [48.390500145598544]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant potential in formal theorem proving.<n>We exploit an informative structure in formal verification: the observation that compilers map a vast space of diverse proof attempts.<n>We introduce a learning-to-refine framework that leverages this compression to perform efficient learning and proof exploration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-13T01:33:20Z)
• A Geometrically-Grounded Drive for MDL-Based Optimization in Deep Learning [3.2452107817263003]
  This paper introduces a novel optimization framework that fundamentally integrates the Minimum Description Length (MDL) principle into the training dynamics of deep neural networks.<n>We provide a practical, computationally efficient algorithm with $O(N log N)$ per-iteration complexity (Theoremrefthm:complexity), alongside guarantees for numerical stability (Theoremrefthm:stability) and exponential convergence under convexity assumptions (Theoremrefthm:convergence_rate)<n>This work provides a principled path toward more autonomous, generalizable, and interpretable AI
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-12T08:31:00Z)
• ProofNet++: A Neuro-Symbolic System for Formal Proof Verification with Self-Correction [0.0]
  We propose ProofNet++, a neuro-symbolic framework that enhances automated theorem proving.<n>We show that ProofNet++ significantly improves proof accuracy, correctness, and formal verifiability over prior models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T05:44:34Z)
• DeepTheorem: Advancing LLM Reasoning for Theorem Proving Through Natural Language and Reinforcement Learning [67.93945726549289]
  DeepTheorem is a comprehensive informal theorem-proving framework exploiting natural language to enhance mathematical reasoning.<n>DeepTheorem includes a large-scale benchmark dataset consisting of 121K high-quality IMO-level informal theorems and proofs.<n>We devise a novel reinforcement learning strategy (RL-Zero) explicitly tailored to informal theorem proving, leveraging the verified theorem variants to incentivize robust mathematical inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T17:59:39Z)
• Function Forms of Simple ReLU Networks with Random Hidden Weights [1.2289361708127877]
  We investigate the function space dynamics of a two-layer ReLU neural network in the infinite-width limit.<n>We highlight the Fisher information matrix's role in steering learning.<n>This work offers a robust foundation for understanding wide neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T13:53:02Z)
• Universal Approximation Theorem for Deep Q-Learning via FBSDE System [2.1756081703276]
  This paper establishes a Universal Approximation Theorem for a class of Deep Q-Networks (DQNs)<n>We show that layers of a deep residual network, conceived as neural operators acting on function spaces, can approximate the action of the Bellman operator.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-09T13:11:55Z)
• ProofAug: Efficient Neural Theorem Proving via Fine-grained Proof Structure Analysis [50.020850767257095]
  We propose ProofAug, a procedure that equips LLMs with automation methods at various granularities.<n>Our method is validated on the miniF2F benchmark using the open-source deep-math-7b-base model and the Isabelle proof assistant.<n>We also implement a Lean 4 version of ProofAug that can improve the pass@1 performance of Kimina-Prover-seek-Distill-1.5B from 44.3% to 50.4%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-30T12:37:06Z)
• Lean-STaR: Learning to Interleave Thinking and Proving [53.923617816215774]
  We present Lean-STaR, a framework for training language models to produce informal thoughts prior to each step of a proof.<n>Lean-STaR achieves state-of-the-art results on the miniF2F-test benchmark within the Lean theorem proving environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-14T01:43:07Z)
• Promises and Pitfalls of the Linearized Laplace in Bayesian Optimization [73.80101701431103]
  The linearized-Laplace approximation (LLA) has been shown to be effective and efficient in constructing Bayesian neural networks. We study the usefulness of the LLA in Bayesian optimization and highlight its strong performance and flexibility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-17T14:23:43Z)
• Function Approximation with Randomly Initialized Neural Networks for Approximate Model Reference Adaptive Control [0.0]
  Recent results have demonstrated that for specialized activation functions, such as ReLUs, high accuracy can be achieved via linear combinations of randomly activations. This paper defines mollified integral representations, which provide a means to form integral representations of target functions using activations for which no direct integral representation is currently known.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-28T18:55:48Z)
• Formalizing Piecewise Affine Activation Functions of Neural Networks in Coq [0.0]
  We present the first formalization of pwa activation functions for an interactive theorem prover tailored to verifying neural networks within Coq. As a proof-of-concept, we construct the popular pwa activation function ReLU. Our formalization paves the way for integrating Coq in frameworks of neural network verification as a fallback prover when automated proving fails.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-30T13:53:52Z)
• Provable General Function Class Representation Learning in Multitask Bandits and MDPs [58.624124220900306]
  multitask representation learning is a popular approach in reinforcement learning to boost the sample efficiency. In this work, we extend the analysis to general function class representations. We theoretically validate the benefit of multitask representation learning within general function class for bandits and linear MDP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-31T11:36:42Z)
• UNIPoint: Universally Approximating Point Processes Intensities [125.08205865536577]
  We provide a proof that a class of learnable functions can universally approximate any valid intensity function. We implement UNIPoint, a novel neural point process model, using recurrent neural networks to parameterise sums of basis function upon each event.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-28T09:31:56Z)
• Formal Synthesis of Lyapunov Neural Networks [61.79595926825511]
  We propose an automatic and formally sound method for synthesising Lyapunov functions. We employ a counterexample-guided approach where a numerical learner and a symbolic verifier interact to construct provably correct Lyapunov neural networks. Our method synthesises Lyapunov functions faster and over wider spatial domains than the alternatives, yet providing stronger or equal guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-19T17:21:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.