Lifting the Cage of Consent: A Techno-Legal Perspective on Evolvable Trust Relationships
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.03674v1
- Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2025 11:05:18 GMT
- Title: Lifting the Cage of Consent: A Techno-Legal Perspective on Evolvable Trust Relationships
- Authors: Beatriz Esteves, Ruben Verborgh,
- Abstract summary: We argue that our data does not flow well enough, cultivating a reliance on questionable and often unlawful shortcuts.<n>We propose the implementation of evolvable trust systems as a scalable alternative to the omnipresent yet deeply broken delusion of ill-informed consent.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Those concerned about privacy worry that personal data changes hands too easily. We argue that the actual challenge is the exact opposite: our data does not flow well enough, cultivating a reliance on questionable and often unlawful shortcuts in a desperate bid to survive within today's data-driven economy. Exclusively punitive interpretations of protective legislation such as the GDPR throw out the baby with the bathwater through barriers that equally hinder "doing the right thing" and "doing the wrong thing", in an abject mistranslation of how ethical choices correspond to financial cost. As long as privacy-friendly data treatment proves more expensive or complicated than readily available alternatives, economic imperatives will continue to outrank their legal counterparts. We examined existing legislation with the aim of facilitating mutually beneficial interactions, rather than more narrowly focusing on the prevention of undesired behaviors. In this article, we propose the implementation of evolvable trust systems as a scalable alternative to the omnipresent yet deeply broken delusion of ill-informed consent. We describe personalized, technology-assisted legal processes for initiating and maintaining long-term trust relationships, which enable parties to reliably and sustainably exchange data, goods, and services. Our proposal encourages a redirection of additional efforts towards the techno-legal alignment of economical incentives with societal ones, reminding us that - while trust remains an inherently human concept - technology can support people in evolving and scaling their relationships to meet the increasingly complex demands of current and future data landscapes.
Related papers
- Frontier AI Auditing: Toward Rigorous Third-Party Assessment of Safety and Security Practices at Leading AI Companies [57.521647436515785]
We define frontier AI auditing as rigorous third-party verification of frontier AI developers' safety and security claims.<n>We introduce AI Assurance Levels (AAL-1 to AAL-4), ranging from time-bounded system audits to continuous, deception-resilient verification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-16T18:44:09Z) - Data Traceability for Privacy Alignment [1.1970748626806043]
We offer a new privacy approach for the growing ecosystem of services dependent on personal data sharing between individuals and third parties.<n>We introduce the concept of covert-accountability, which addresses the risk from adversaries that may act dishonestly but nevertheless face potential identification and legal consequences.<n>We present the OTrace protocol, designed to provide traceable, accountable, consumer-control in third-party data sharing ecosystems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-12T20:42:23Z) - Reputation Management in the ChatGPT Era [4.485614995478454]
Generative AI systems often generate outputs about real people, even when not explicitly prompted to do so.<n>This paper considers what legal tools currently exist to protect such individuals, with a particular focus on defamation and data protection law.<n>We conclude by noting the limitations of these individualistic remedies and hint at the need for a more systemic, environmental approach to protecting the infosphere against generative AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-09T10:17:44Z) - Rethinking People Analytics With Inverse Transparency by Design [57.67333075002697]
We propose a new design approach for workforce analytics we refer to as inverse transparency by design.
We find that architectural changes are made without inhibiting core functionality.
We conclude that inverse transparency by design is a promising approach to realize accepted and responsible people analytics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-16T21:37:35Z) - Auditing and Generating Synthetic Data with Controllable Trust Trade-offs [54.262044436203965]
We introduce a holistic auditing framework that comprehensively evaluates synthetic datasets and AI models.
It focuses on preventing bias and discrimination, ensures fidelity to the source data, assesses utility, robustness, and privacy preservation.
We demonstrate the framework's effectiveness by auditing various generative models across diverse use cases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-21T09:03:18Z) - Trustworthy Transparency by Design [57.67333075002697]
We propose a transparency framework for software design, incorporating research on user trust and experience.
Our framework enables developing software that incorporates transparency in its design.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-19T12:34:01Z) - Preference-Based Privacy Trading [19.23266277956912]
We propose a design of regulated efficient/bounded inefficient economic mechanisms for oligopoly data trading markets using a novel preference function bidding approach on a simplified sellers-broker market.
Our methodology preserves the heterogeneous privacy preservation constraints (at a grouped consumer, i.e., app, level) upto certain compromise levels, and at the same time satisfies information demand (via the broker) of agencies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-10T07:03:10Z) - Online publication of court records: circumventing the
privacy-transparency trade-off [0.0]
We argue that current practices are insufficient for coping with massive access to legal data.
We propose a straw man multimodal architecture paving the way to a full-fledged privacy-preserving legal data publishing system.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-03T13:58:01Z) - A vision for global privacy bridges: Technical and legal measures for
international data markets [77.34726150561087]
Despite data protection laws and an acknowledged right to privacy, trading personal information has become a business equated with "trading oil"
An open conflict is arising between business demands for data and a desire for privacy.
We propose and test a vision of a personal information market with privacy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-13T13:55:50Z) - Beyond privacy regulations: an ethical approach to data usage in
transportation [64.86110095869176]
We describe how Federated Machine Learning can be applied to the transportation sector.
We see Federated Learning as a method that enables us to process privacy-sensitive data, while respecting customer's privacy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-01T15:10:12Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.