Simulating Life Paths with Digital Twins: AI-Generated Future Selves Influence Decision-Making and Expand Human Choice
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.05397v2
- Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2025 04:59:40 GMT
- Title: Simulating Life Paths with Digital Twins: AI-Generated Future Selves Influence Decision-Making and Expand Human Choice
- Authors: Rachel Poonsiriwong, Chayapatr Archiwaranguprok, Constanze Albrecht, Peggy Yin, Nattavudh Powdthavee, Hal Hershfield, Monchai Lertsutthiwong, Kavin Winson, Pat Pataranutaporn,
- Abstract summary: We introduce AI-enabled digital twins that have lived through'' simulated life scenarios.<n>Rather than predicting optimal outcomes, these simulations extend prospective cognition by making alternative futures vivid.
- Score: 9.15392262037427
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Major life transitions demand high-stakes decisions, yet people often struggle to imagine how their future selves will live with the consequences. To support this limited capacity for mental time travel, we introduce AI-enabled digital twins that have ``lived through'' simulated life scenarios. Rather than predicting optimal outcomes, these simulations extend prospective cognition by making alternative futures vivid enough to support deliberation without assuming which path is best. We evaluate this idea in a randomized controlled study (N=192) using multimodal synthesis - facial age progression, voice cloning, and large language model dialogue - to create personalized avatars representing participants 30 years forward. Young adults 18 to 28 years old described pending binary decisions and were assigned to guided imagination or one of four avatar conditions: single-option, balanced dual-option, or expanded three-option with a system-generated novel alternative. Results showed asymmetric effects: single-sided avatars increased shifts toward the presented option, while balanced presentation produced movement toward both. Introducing a system-generated third option increased adoption of this new alternative compared to control, suggesting that AI-generated future selves can expand choice by surfacing paths that might otherwise go unnoticed. Participants rated evaluative reasoning and eudaimonic meaning-making as more important than emotional or visual vividness. Perceived persuasiveness and baseline agency predicted decision change. These findings advance understanding of AI-mediated episodic prospection and raise questions about autonomy in AI-augmented decisions.
Related papers
- Future You: Designing and Evaluating Multimodal AI-generated Digital Twins for Strengthening Future Self-Continuity [25.629127439391166]
We report a randomized controlled study evaluating three modalities of AI-generated future selves (text, voice, avatar) against a neutral control condition.<n>All personalized modalities strengthened Future Self-Continuity (FSC), emotional well-being, and motivation compared to control, with avatar producing the largest vividness gains.<n> Interaction quality metrics, particularly persuasiveness, realism, and user engagement, emerged as robust predictors of psychological and affective outcomes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-05T19:24:18Z) - AI Automatons: AI Systems Intended to Imitate Humans [54.19152688545896]
There is a growing proliferation of AI systems designed to mimic people's behavior, work, abilities, likenesses, or humanness.<n>The research, design, deployment, and availability of such AI systems have prompted growing concerns about a wide range of possible legal, ethical, and other social impacts.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-04T03:55:38Z) - Future You: A Conversation with an AI-Generated Future Self Reduces Anxiety, Negative Emotions, and Increases Future Self-Continuity [20.404091166696052]
We introduce "Future You," an interactive, brief, single-session, digital chat intervention designed to improve future self-continuity.
Our system allows users to chat with a relatable yet AI-powered virtual version of their future selves that is tuned to their future goals and personal qualities.
After a brief interaction with the "Future You" character, users reported decreased anxiety, and increased future self-continuity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-21T06:00:51Z) - Assessing Large Language Models' ability to predict how humans balance
self-interest and the interest of others [0.0]
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) holds enormous potential to revolutionize decision-making processes.
By leveraging generative AI, humans can benefit from data-driven insights and predictions.
However, for AI to be a reliable assistant for decision-making it is crucial that it is able to capture the balance between self-interest and the interest of others.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-21T13:23:31Z) - Learning signatures of decision making from many individuals playing the
same game [54.33783158658077]
We design a predictive framework that learns representations to encode an individual's 'behavioral style'
We apply our method to a large-scale behavioral dataset from 1,000 humans playing a 3-armed bandit task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-21T21:41:53Z) - Selective Explanations: Leveraging Human Input to Align Explainable AI [40.33998268146951]
We propose a general framework for generating selective explanations by leveraging human input on a small sample.
As a showcase, we use a decision-support task to explore selective explanations based on what the decision-maker would consider relevant to the decision task.
Our experiments demonstrate the promise of selective explanations in reducing over-reliance on AI.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-23T19:00:02Z) - A-ACT: Action Anticipation through Cycle Transformations [89.83027919085289]
We take a step back to analyze how the human capability to anticipate the future can be transferred to machine learning algorithms.
A recent study on human psychology explains that, in anticipating an occurrence, the human brain counts on both systems.
In this work, we study the impact of each system for the task of action anticipation and introduce a paradigm to integrate them in a learning framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-02T21:50:45Z) - The Introspective Agent: Interdependence of Strategy, Physiology, and
Sensing for Embodied Agents [51.94554095091305]
We argue for an introspective agent, which considers its own abilities in the context of its environment.
Just as in nature, we hope to reframe strategy as one tool, among many, to succeed in an environment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-02T20:14:01Z) - Learning to Anticipate Egocentric Actions by Imagination [60.21323541219304]
We study the egocentric action anticipation task, which predicts future action seconds before it is performed for egocentric videos.
Our method significantly outperforms previous methods on both the seen test set and the unseen test set of the EPIC Kitchens Action Anticipation Challenge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-13T08:04:10Z) - Indecision Modeling [50.00689136829134]
It is important that AI systems act in ways which align with human values.
People are often indecisive, and especially so when their decision has moral implications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-15T18:32:37Z) - Future Frame Prediction of a Video Sequence [5.660207256468971]
The ability to predict, anticipate and reason about future events is the essence of intelligence.
The ability to predict, anticipate and reason about future events is the essence of intelligence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-31T15:31:02Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.