Know your Trajectory -- Trustworthy Reinforcement Learning deployment through Importance-Based Trajectory Analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.06917v1
• Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2025 16:52:08 GMT
• Title: Know your Trajectory -- Trustworthy Reinforcement Learning deployment through Importance-Based Trajectory Analysis
• Abstract summary: We introduce a novel framework that ranks entire trajectories by defining and aggregating a new state-importance metric.<n>We demonstrate that our method successfully identifies optimal trajectories from a heterogeneous collection of agent experiences.<n>Our experiments in standard OpenAI Gym environments validate that our proposed importance metric is more effective at identifying optimal behaviors.
• Score: 6.7842735984907465
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: As Reinforcement Learning (RL) agents are increasingly deployed in real-world applications, ensuring their behavior is transparent and trustworthy is paramount. A key component of trust is explainability, yet much of the work in Explainable RL (XRL) focuses on local, single-step decisions. This paper addresses the critical need for explaining an agent's long-term behavior through trajectory-level analysis. We introduce a novel framework that ranks entire trajectories by defining and aggregating a new state-importance metric. This metric combines the classic Q-value difference with a "radical term" that captures the agent's affinity to reach its goal, providing a more nuanced measure of state criticality. We demonstrate that our method successfully identifies optimal trajectories from a heterogeneous collection of agent experiences. Furthermore, by generating counterfactual rollouts from critical states within these trajectories, we show that the agent's chosen path is robustly superior to alternatives, thereby providing a powerful "Why this, and not that?" explanation. Our experiments in standard OpenAI Gym environments validate that our proposed importance metric is more effective at identifying optimal behaviors compared to classic approaches, offering a significant step towards trustworthy autonomous systems.

Related papers

• STAPO: Selective Trajectory-Aware Policy Optimization for LLM Agent Training [25.087853601817688]
  Reinforcement Learning (RL) is the dominant paradigm for training Large Language Model (LLM) agents on long-horizon tasks.<n>We propose normalized entropy, which measures confidence deviations relative to an agent's average behavior under a given state.<n>We introduce Selective Trajectory-Aware Policy Optimization (STAPO), a hierarchical group-based RL framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-06T11:50:06Z)
• Self-evolving LLM agents with in-distribution Optimization [60.05867547965365]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently emerged as powerful controllers for interactive agents in complex environments.<n>We propose Q-Evolve, a self-evolving framework for LLM agents that unifies automatic process-reward labeling and policy learning.<n>We evaluate our method on AlfWorld, WebShop, and ScienceWorld, showing Q-Evolve outperforms strong baselines in sample efficiency, robustness, and overall task performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-05T15:09:52Z)
• Consistency as a Testable Property: Statistical Methods to Evaluate AI Agent Reliability [6.195988633460139]
  This paper establishes a rigorous measurement science for AI agent reliability.<n>By leveraging $U$-statistics for output-level reliability and kernel-based metrics for trajectory-level stability, we offer a principled approach to evaluating agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-11T13:06:24Z)
• Utilizing and Calibrating Hindsight Process Rewards via Reinforcement with Mutual Information Self-Evaluation [50.696688705287755]
  We propose Mutual Information Self-Evaluation to overcome the sparse reward challenge in reinforcement learning.<n>MISE enables an agent to learn autonomously from dense internal rewards supplementing sparse extrinsic signals.<n>We prove that utilizing hindsight self-evaluation rewards is equivalent to minimizing an objective that combines mutual information with a KL divergence term between the policy and a proxy reward policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-13T15:18:51Z)
• SEARL: Joint Optimization of Policy and Tool Graph Memory for Self-Evolving Agents [35.45207852488779]
  We introduce a Tool-Memory based self-evolving agentic framework SEARL.<n>Unlike approaches that directly utilize interaction experiences, our method constructs a structured experience memory that integrates planning with execution.<n>We evaluate our framework on knowledge reasoning and mathematics tasks, demonstrating its effectiveness in achieving more practical and efficient learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-09T04:38:47Z)
• ChatShopBuddy: Towards Reliable Conversational Shopping Agents via Reinforcement Learning [88.87305027895657]
  This work investigates Reinforcement Learning-based optimization for shopping agents in real-world scenarios.<n>Agents must simultaneously satisfy multiple interdependent objectives spanning objective metrics (product correctness), subjective qualities (persuasiveness), outcome rewards (final response quality), and process rewards (tool efficiency)<n>Experiments demonstrate that our RL-trained agent, ChatShopBuddy, consistently outperforms larger models relying on generic reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-06T09:18:51Z)
• From Passive Metric to Active Signal: The Evolving Role of Uncertainty Quantification in Large Language Models [77.04403907729738]
  This survey charts the evolution of uncertainty from a passive diagnostic metric to an active control signal guiding real-time model behavior.<n>We demonstrate how uncertainty is leveraged as an active control signal across three frontiers.<n>This survey argues that mastering the new trend of uncertainty is essential for building the next generation of scalable, reliable, and trustworthy AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T06:21:31Z)
• The Why Behind the Action: Unveiling Internal Drivers via Agentic Attribution [63.61358761489141]
  Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents are widely used in real-world applications such as customer service, web navigation, and software engineering.<n>We propose a novel framework for textbfgeneral agentic attribution, designed to identify the internal factors driving agent actions regardless of the task outcome.<n>We validate our framework across a diverse suite of agentic scenarios, including standard tool use and subtle reliability risks like memory-induced bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-21T15:22:21Z)
• Agent-Dice: Disentangling Knowledge Updates via Geometric Consensus for Agent Continual Learning [41.461840578204956]
  Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents learn new tasks without catastrophic forgetting.<n>Agent-Dice is a parameter fusion framework based on directional consensus evaluation.<n>Experiments on GUI agents and tool-use agent domains demonstrate that Agent-Dice exhibits outstanding continual learning performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-07T06:43:50Z)
• Rewarding the Journey, Not Just the Destination: A Composite Path and Answer Self-Scoring Reward Mechanism for Test-Time Reinforcement Learning [29.778703252962092]
  Reinforcement Learning (RL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for advancing Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We develop a novel test-time reward mechanism that operates without external supervision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-20T07:53:51Z)
• Beyond the Final Answer: Evaluating the Reasoning Trajectories of Tool-Augmented Agents [22.781523439717223]
  A proper evaluation of an agent's performance must go beyond the final answer to also assess the problem-solving trajectory.<n>We introduce TRACE, a framework for the multi-dimensional evaluation of tool-augmented LLM agent performance.<n>Our results confirm that TRACE accurately evaluates these complex behaviors in a scalable and cost-effective manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-03T09:19:15Z)
• STARec: An Efficient Agent Framework for Recommender Systems via Autonomous Deliberate Reasoning [54.28691219536054]
  We introduce STARec, a slow-thinking augmented agent framework that endows recommender systems with autonomous deliberative reasoning capabilities.<n>We develop anchored reinforcement training - a two-stage paradigm combining structured knowledge distillation from advanced reasoning models with preference-aligned reward shaping.<n>Experiments on MovieLens 1M and Amazon CDs benchmarks demonstrate that STARec achieves substantial performance gains compared with state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-26T08:47:58Z)
• Consistent Paths Lead to Truth: Self-Rewarding Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning [87.7836502955847]
  We propose a novel self-rewarding reinforcement learning framework to enhance Large Language Model (LLM) reasoning.<n>Our key insight is that correct responses often exhibit consistent trajectory patterns in terms of model likelihood.<n>We introduce CoVo, an intrinsic reward mechanism that integrates Consistency and Volatility via a robust vector-space aggregation strategy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-10T12:40:39Z)
• From Novice to Expert: LLM Agent Policy Optimization via Step-wise Reinforcement Learning [62.54484062185869]
  We introduce StepAgent, which utilizes step-wise reward to optimize the agent's reinforcement learning process.<n>We propose implicit-reward and inverse reinforcement learning techniques to facilitate agent reflection and policy adjustment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-06T10:35:11Z)
• Explaining Reinforcement Learning Policies through Counterfactual Trajectories [147.7246109100945]
  A human developer must validate that an RL agent will perform well at test-time. Our method conveys how the agent performs under distribution shifts by showing the agent's behavior across a wider trajectory distribution. In a user study, we demonstrate that our method enables users to score better than baseline methods on one of two agent validation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-29T00:52:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.