Reformulate, Retrieve, Localize: Agents for Repository-Level Bug Localization

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.07022v1
• Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2025 22:25:11 GMT
• Title: Reformulate, Retrieve, Localize: Agents for Repository-Level Bug Localization
• Abstract summary: Bug localization remains a critical yet time-consuming challenge in large-scale software repositories.<n>Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have improved bug localization through query reformulation.<n>In this study, we investigate how an LLM-powered agent can improve file-level bug localization via lightweight query reformulation and summarization.
• Score: 2.4063592468412276
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Bug localization remains a critical yet time-consuming challenge in large-scale software repositories. Traditional information retrieval-based bug localization (IRBL) methods rely on unchanged bug descriptions, which often contain noisy information, leading to poor retrieval accuracy. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have improved bug localization through query reformulation, yet the effect on agent performance remains unexplored. In this study, we investigate how an LLM-powered agent can improve file-level bug localization via lightweight query reformulation and summarization. We first employ an open-source, non-fine-tuned LLM to extract key information from bug reports, such as identifiers and code snippets, and reformulate queries pre-retrieval. Our agent then orchestrates BM25 retrieval using these preprocessed queries, automating localization workflow at scale. Using the best-performing query reformulation technique, our agent achieves 35% better ranking in first-file retrieval than our BM25 baseline and up to +22% file retrieval performance over SWE-agent.

Related papers

• SAGE: Benchmarking and Improving Retrieval for Deep Research Agents [60.53966065867568]
  We introduce SAGE, a benchmark for scientific literature retrieval comprising 1,200 queries across four scientific domains, with a 200,000 paper retrieval corpus.<n>We evaluate six deep research agents and find that all systems struggle with reasoning-intensive retrieval.<n> BM25 significantly outperforms LLM-based retrievers by approximately 30%, as existing agents generate keyword-oriented sub-queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-05T18:25:24Z)
• Rethinking On-policy Optimization for Query Augmentation [49.87723664806526]
  We present the first systematic comparison of prompting-based and RL-based query augmentation across diverse benchmarks.<n>We introduce a novel hybrid method, On-policy Pseudo-document Query Expansion (OPQE), which learns to generate a pseudo-document that maximizes retrieval performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-20T04:16:28Z)
• Reasoning-enhanced Query Understanding through Decomposition and Interpretation [87.56450566014625]
  ReDI is a Reasoning-enhanced approach for query understanding through Decomposition and Interpretation.<n>We compiled a large-scale dataset of real-world complex queries from a major search engine.<n> Experiments on BRIGHT and BEIR demonstrate that ReDI consistently surpasses strong baselines in both sparse and dense retrieval paradigms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-08T10:58:42Z)
• SweRank: Software Issue Localization with Code Ranking [109.3289316191729]
  SweRank is an efficient retrieve-and-rerank framework for software issue localization.<n>We construct SweLoc, a large-scale dataset curated from public GitHub repositories.<n>We show that SweRank achieves state-of-the-art performance, outperforming both prior ranking models and costly agent-based systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-07T19:44:09Z)
• Guiding Retrieval using LLM-based Listwise Rankers [15.3583908068962]
  We propose an adaptation of an existing adaptive retrieval method that supports the listwise setting.<n>Specifically, our proposed algorithm merges results both from the initial ranking and feedback documents.<n>We demonstrate that our method can improve nDCG@10 by up to 13.23% and recall by 28.02%--all while keeping the total number of LLM inferences constant and overheads due to the adaptive process minimal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-15T22:23:53Z)
• Invar-RAG: Invariant LLM-aligned Retrieval for Better Generation [43.630437906898635]
  We propose a novel two-stage fine-tuning architecture called Invar-RAG. In the retrieval stage, an LLM-based retriever is constructed by integrating LoRA-based representation learning. In the generation stage, a refined fine-tuning method is employed to improve LLM accuracy in generating answers based on retrieved information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-11T14:25:37Z)
• Optimizing Query Generation for Enhanced Document Retrieval in RAG [53.10369742545479]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) excel in various language tasks but they often generate incorrect information. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) aims to mitigate this by using document retrieval for accurate responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T05:50:32Z)
• Redefining Information Retrieval of Structured Database via Large Language Models [10.117751707641416]
  This paper introduces a novel retrieval augmentation framework called ChatLR. It primarily employs the powerful semantic understanding ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) as retrievers to achieve precise and concise information retrieval. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of ChatLR in addressing user queries, achieving an overall information retrieval accuracy exceeding 98.8%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-09T02:37:53Z)
• When Large Language Models Confront Repository-Level Automatic Program Repair: How Well They Done? [13.693311241492827]
  We introduce RepoBugs, a new benchmark comprising 124 typical repository-level bugs from open-source repositories. Preliminary experiments using GPT3.5 based on the function where the error is located, reveal that the repair rate on RepoBugs is only 22.58%. We propose a simple and universal repository-level context extraction method (RLCE) designed to provide more precise context for repository-level code repair tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-01T11:07:41Z)
• Query Rewriting for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models [139.242907155883]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) play powerful, black-box readers in the retrieve-then-read pipeline. This work introduces a new framework, Rewrite-Retrieve-Read instead of the previous retrieve-then-read for the retrieval-augmented LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T17:27:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.