A Bootstrap Perspective on Stochastic Gradient Descent

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.07676v1
• Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2025 16:10:56 GMT
• Title: A Bootstrap Perspective on Stochastic Gradient Descent
• Authors: Hongjian Lan, Yucong Liu, Florian Schäfer,
• Abstract summary: Machine learning models trained with emphstochastic gradient descent (SGD) can generalize better than those trained with deterministic gradient descent (GD)
• Score: 3.6449336503217786
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Machine learning models trained with \emph{stochastic} gradient descent (SGD) can generalize better than those trained with deterministic gradient descent (GD). In this work, we study SGD's impact on generalization through the lens of the statistical bootstrap: SGD uses gradient variability under batch sampling as a proxy for solution variability under the randomness of the data collection process. We use empirical results and theoretical analysis to substantiate this claim. In idealized experiments on empirical risk minimization, we show that SGD is drawn to parameter choices that are robust under resampling and thus avoids spurious solutions even if they lie in wider and deeper minima of the training loss. We prove rigorously that by implicitly regularizing the trace of the gradient covariance matrix, SGD controls the algorithmic variability. This regularization leads to solutions that are less sensitive to sampling noise, thereby improving generalization. Numerical experiments on neural network training show that explicitly incorporating the estimate of the algorithmic variability as a regularizer improves test performance. This fact supports our claim that bootstrap estimation underpins SGD's generalization advantages.

Related papers

• A Simplified Analysis of SGD for Linear Regression with Weight Averaging [64.2393952273612]
  Recent work bycitetzou 2021benign provides sharp rates for SGD optimization in linear regression using constant learning rate.<n>We provide a simplified analysis recovering the same bias and variance bounds provided incitepzou 2021benign based on simple linear algebra tools.<n>We believe our work makes the analysis of gradient descent on linear regression very accessible and will be helpful in further analyzing mini-batching and learning rate scheduling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-18T15:10:38Z)
• Estimating Generalization Performance Along the Trajectory of Proximal SGD in Robust Regression [4.150180443030652]
  We introduce estimators that precisely track the generalization error of the iterates along the trajectory of the iterative algorithm. The results are illustrated through several examples, including Huber regression, pseudo-Huber regression, and their penalized variants with non-smooth regularizer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T16:13:42Z)
• Effect of Random Learning Rate: Theoretical Analysis of SGD Dynamics in Non-Convex Optimization via Stationary Distribution [5.5165579223151795]
  We consider a variant of the gradient descent (SGD) with a random learning rate.<n>We show that a distribution of a parameter updated by Poisson SGD converges to a stationary distribution under weak assumptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-23T06:52:33Z)
• Non-asymptotic Analysis of Biased Adaptive Stochastic Approximation [3.328448170090945]
  Gradient Descent (SGD) with adaptive steps is widely used to train deep neural networks and generative models.<n>This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the effect of bias on gradient functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-05T10:17:36Z)
• Boosting Differentiable Causal Discovery via Adaptive Sample Reweighting [62.23057729112182]
  Differentiable score-based causal discovery methods learn a directed acyclic graph from observational data. We propose a model-agnostic framework to boost causal discovery performance by dynamically learning the adaptive weights for the Reweighted Score function, ReScore.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-06T14:49:59Z)
• Implicit Regularization or Implicit Conditioning? Exact Risk Trajectories of SGD in High Dimensions [26.782342518986503]
  gradient descent (SGD) is a pillar of modern machine learning, serving as the go-to optimization algorithm for a diverse array of problems. We show how to adapt the HSGD formalism to include streaming SGD, which allows us to produce an exact prediction for the excess risk of multi-pass SGD relative to that of streaming SGD.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-15T02:32:26Z)
• Gaussian Process Inference Using Mini-batch Stochastic Gradient Descent: Convergence Guarantees and Empirical Benefits [21.353189917487512]
  gradient descent (SGD) and its variants have established themselves as the go-to algorithms for machine learning problems. We take a step forward by proving minibatch SGD converges to a critical point of the full log-likelihood loss function. Our theoretical guarantees hold provided that the kernel functions exhibit exponential or eigendecay.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-19T22:28:47Z)
• On the Double Descent of Random Features Models Trained with SGD [78.0918823643911]
  We study properties of random features (RF) regression in high dimensions optimized by gradient descent (SGD) We derive precise non-asymptotic error bounds of RF regression under both constant and adaptive step-size SGD setting. We observe the double descent phenomenon both theoretically and empirically.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-13T17:47:39Z)
• Stochastic Training is Not Necessary for Generalization [57.04880404584737]
  It is widely believed that the implicit regularization of gradient descent (SGD) is fundamental to the impressive generalization behavior we observe in neural networks. In this work, we demonstrate that non-stochastic full-batch training can achieve strong performance on CIFAR-10 that is on-par with SGD.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-29T00:50:00Z)
• Direction Matters: On the Implicit Bias of Stochastic Gradient Descent with Moderate Learning Rate [105.62979485062756]
  This paper attempts to characterize the particular regularization effect of SGD in the moderate learning rate regime. We show that SGD converges along the large eigenvalue directions of the data matrix, while GD goes after the small eigenvalue directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-04T21:07:52Z)
• Unbiased Risk Estimators Can Mislead: A Case Study of Learning with Complementary Labels [92.98756432746482]
  We study a weakly supervised problem called learning with complementary labels. We show that the quality of gradient estimation matters more in risk minimization. We propose a novel surrogate complementary loss(SCL) framework that trades zero bias with reduced variance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-05T04:19:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.